What | Removed | Added |
---|---|---|
CC | jlee@suse.com, rjschwei@suse.com, rw@suse.com | |
Flags | needinfo?(rjschwei@suse.com) |
From my PoV this issue can be solved in two ways: #1 change `shim` to require the proper grub-platform for the architecture it is built for and not the generic `grub2-efi` (which was IMHO obsoleted by the noarch-move in FATE#326960). This may take a considerable amount of time, depending on whether repackaging of `shim` will require a new M$ signature or not. #2 amend the image definition, that pulls in `shim`, to also request the grub2-platform package (`grub2-x86_64-efi` in this case), to avoid the BS ambiguity. Robert, would #2 be a viable option?