http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542169
User kkaempf@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542169#c1
--- Comment #1 from Klaus Kämpf 2009-09-25 09:18:17 MDT ---
Neither controller/action nor module/controller/action are actually sufficient
if we want to be flexible.
Example: An 'interface' resource below 'network'. This would normally translate
into a Network::interface_controller (-> network/interface url).
Problem: How do we support another contributor with his own implementation of
network interfaces ?
This whole 'base resources on dot.separated.interface.pathes' is to support
i.e.
org.opensuse.network.interface and com.redhat.network.interface side-by-side.
The only 'standard Rails' solution I can come up with is nested modules, i.e.
Org::Opensuse::Network::interface_controller (translating to
app/controllers/org/opensuse/network/interface_controller.rb).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
