http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043231 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043231#c21 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bpoirier@suse.com --- Comment #21 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> --- (In reply to Matwey Kornilov from comment #20)
0001-ARM-EXYNOS-Remove-calls-to-of_genpd_get_from_provide.patch is 0002-mvebu-Use-dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus-to-mark-OPP-ta.patch is 0003-cpufreq-tegra124-No-need-of-setting-platform-data.patch is
They are fine.
0004-extcon-adc-jack-Remove-the-usage-of-extcon_set_state.patch 0005-extcon-arizona-Remove-the-usage-of-extcon_update_sta.patch
OK, these aren't used for x86, so it's no big problem about kABI change for now.
0006-input-misc-max77693-Use-pwm_get_args-where-appropria.patch
Ditto.
0007-ACPI-bus-add-stub-acpi_evaluate_dsm-to-linux-acpi.h.patch 0008-ACPI-bus-add-stub-acpi_dev_found-to-linux-acpi.h.patch
These are required to fix:
/home/matwey/lab/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c: In function 'hns_dsaf_get_cfg': /home/matwey/lab/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c:64: 7: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_dev_found' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (acpi_dev_found(hns_dsaf_acpi_match[0].id))
So, actually it is SUSE kernel patch net-hns-dsaf-adds-support-of-acpi.patch which breaks hisilicon compilation for armv7l. I think there could be three options 1) accepting ACPI-* patches 2) fixing net-hns-dsaf-adds-support-of-acpi.patch, net-hns-net-hns-enet-adds-support-of-acpi.patch, net-hns-Add-ACPI-support-to-check-SFP-present.patch and net-hns-implement-the-miscellaneous-operation-by-asl.patch in order no to use acpi_dev_found() and acpi_evaluate_dsm() functions at armv7l 3) disable NET_VENDOR_HISILICON_HNS in config and not to build this code. What would you prefer?
I put Benjamin to Cc. But I guess these two are fine from the kABI POV, too, as they just add dummy static inline functions. So far, so good. I'll try to apply these ones. Let's check the rest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.