https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656104 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656104#c22 --- Comment #22 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@novell.com> 2011-02-10 15:18:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18)
Btw: How about a small library with an actual systemd socket activation code instead of including the code several times?
We have bug 656259 open because of this. I don't think it makes sense to reimplement it and provide own library... same as I don't think this gets fixed for 11.4 :-( What would make sense is to try to add the functionality to forward [inherit] the sockets to a child into upstream code. Further, also to add an option to sd_listen_fds to not set FD_CLOEXEC flags (or add a variant of the function avoiding this), so we can use these functions in startproc and in fork code of the daemons...
Maybe also having cgroup support for start/killproc would also an option. What do you think?
This sounds like a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.