![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
18 Apr
2018
18 Apr
'18
13:28
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986851 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986851#c10 --- Comment #10 from Martin Pluskal--- (In reply to Christian Wittmer from comment #9) > (In reply to Martin Pluskal from comment #8) > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982132#c11 > seems you are staying in the same line of those 'unlogical' decision makers. > > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742756#c6 > seems you keep everything stored somewhere to bring it up again after 3 > years. > > > That is apparently more complex then what was done here, or what any other > > distribution is doing - but if you find time to implement this somehow I am > > sure it will be greatly appreciated > where is the complexity to run this batch twice ? > 1. run) informing reporter that this BUG will get closed when not changed to > a valid version until the due date of the second run > 2. run) closing the BUG as you did with the batch. > > > Nobody said that there is "probably no interest to fix" > neither paying attention to a BUG, nor adding a valuable comment is just > saying this ... there isn't anyone 'extra' needed to say this loud > > > Nobody said that either - both are straw man argumentation fallacies [1] > this is the logical consequence of not paying attention to a BUG ... > > When you have so much time to search through bugs about my comments, then > you should better add meaningful excuses why orhpaned BUG's don't get > attention as they should get ... Thank you query much for your interest in my time and how I spend it. If you feel that bugs that got closed without any attention need to be excused I guess there is something wrong with your expectations of openSUSE - nobody is promising you anything, there is no obligation or entitlement, though you apparently feel entitled ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.