Comment # 10 on bug 986851 from Martin Pluskal

(In reply to Christian Wittmer from comment #9)
> (In reply to Martin Pluskal from comment #8)
> > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982132#c11
> seems you are staying in the same line of those 'unlogical' decision makers.
> 
> > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742756#c6
> seems you keep everything stored somewhere to bring it up again after 3
> years.
> 
> > That is apparently more complex then what was done here, or what any other
> > distribution is doing - but if you find time to implement this somehow I am
> > sure it will be greatly appreciated
> where is the complexity to run this batch twice ?
> 1. run) informing reporter that this BUG will get closed when not changed to
> a valid version until the due date of the second run
> 2. run) closing the BUG as you did with the batch.
> 
> > Nobody said that there is "probably no interest to fix"
> neither paying attention to a BUG, nor adding a valuable comment is just
> saying this ... there isn't anyone 'extra' needed to say this loud
> 
> > Nobody said that either - both are straw man argumentation fallacies [1]
> this is the logical consequence of not paying attention to a BUG ...
> 
> When you have so much time to search through bugs about my comments, then
> you should better add meaningful excuses why orhpaned BUG's don't get
> attention as they should get ...
Thank you query much for your interest in my time and how I spend it. If you
feel that bugs that got closed without any attention need to be excused I guess
there is something wrong with your expectations of openSUSE - nobody is
promising you anything, there is no obligation or entitlement, though you
apparently feel entitled ...