http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089791
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089791#c4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Brown
(In reply to Richard Brown from comment #2)
Why should there be an X display number when gdm doesn't use X?
I dont know if those display numbers :0 , :1 are specifically associated with X or not. But even without using X, when I run "echo $DISPLAY" from a terminal within desktop it does print ":0" . Even exporting a display to :0 works as it was working before. So it seems even XWayland follows those display number conventions. Then why not log it ?
Xwayland is a backwards compatibilty layer for Wayland I'd expect $DISPLAY to be exported when it's running But I wouldn't expect it to show in last. /var/log/wtmp is not showing which $DISPLAY was available after login, it is recording the console that was used for login. It would be correct to not log an X display if the user didn't login using an X display. I think : would be a correct designation for a wayland session within last -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.