http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191323 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191323#c9 --- Comment #9 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska@suse.com> --- (In reply to Marcus R��ckert from comment #8)
some of those errors are actually a good sign why a working rpmlint check was good:
Sure, I'm going to create issues for all the affected packages.
qpid-proton.log:[ 246s] libqpid-proton10.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error SONAME: libqpid-proton.so.11, expected package suffix: 11
and btw the old code just gave the full correct name so people could just copy it. can we get that behavior back?
I like the idea, but not planning to work on that now. One would need to properly parse the existing package suffix.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.