Comment # 9 on bug 1191323 from Martin Li������ka

(In reply to Marcus R������ckert from comment #8)
> some of those errors are actually a good sign why a working rpmlint check
> was good:

Sure, I'm going to create issues for all the affected packages.

> 
> qpid-proton.log:[  246s] libqpid-proton10.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error
> SONAME: libqpid-proton.so.11, expected package suffix: 11
> 
> and btw the old code just gave the full correct name so people could just
> copy it. can we get that behavior back?

I like the idea, but not planning to work on that now. One would need to
properly parse the existing package suffix..