https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mmeeks@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c2 Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> 2008-11-05 21:11:46 MST --- you might notices the synchronize method is C ;-) and thus part of hwclock. If this is a hwclock issue - please do help by assigning it to the relevant maintainer of util-linux [ I have no idea who that is ]. Wrt. getting the correct time; clearly that is a good idea. My question is - how correct do we want to be ? to the microsecond ? or to the second ? how accurate do you expect the mount time to be ? Presumably the fact that the mount time can be in the past when NTP corrects a badly wrong system clock must be handled too - so; really, I don't understand your concerns. So - again, do we need to wait 1.5 seconds as a result of boot.clock ? or can we be somewhat less precise (perhaps just for the Desktop case), in order to save 3% of our boot time ? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.