http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936463
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936463#c25
Stefan Brüns
As it works for me with some targets isn't it only a disconnect between the binutils and cross-gcc target triplets? There must be some configure magic to tell GCC not only about the build tools to use but about the tools to use in the installed system. --with-as/--with-ld might work here I guess? I really don't like the extra symlinks.
Or we want to forgo with the idea to have multiple cross toolchains for the "same" target (like armv6hl and armv7hl as they just differ in their set of default target options). Or we stop producing just a single cross-binutils package for them.
I also strongly prefer to have just one compiler for arm. Rationale: 1. cross-armv6hl-gcc and cross-armv7hl-gcc are essentially identical * same set of possible targets * both have "--with-float=hard" 2. everyone else uses an arm-<foo>-gnueabi triplet Only minor downside is a little bit of convenience, as one builds by default for the instruction set of the RPi1, the other one for everything else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.