https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230701 fehr@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkoenig@novell.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |rrouch@csusb.edu ------- Comment #8 from fehr@novell.com 2007-01-09 06:09 MST ------- Pretty thourough analysis, thanks for all the details.
From what I can see on a first glance is that YaST2 gets confused when the dmraid name ends on a digit (that it works with "0" at the end is pure luck ;-). Could you please retry naming the volumes without ending the names in digits?
The problem with raid10 is not YaST2 related, the maps set up via dmraid command already have the too small size. YaST2 cannot do much here. Matthias could you check if dmraid even has working support for raid10? Another problem with dmraid is the following: "dmraid -s -c -c -c" displays the following isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0:488391936:128:mirror:ok:0:4:0 /dev/sda:isw:isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0:mirror:ok:488391939:0 /dev/sdb:isw:isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0:mirror:ok:488391939:0 /dev/sdc:isw:isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0:mirror:ok:488391939:0 /dev/sdd:isw:isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0:mirror:ok:488391939:0 but the command "dmraid -s -c -c -c isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0" displays: No RAID sets and with names: "isw_cabcgdjhe_Volume0" this seems inconsistent to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.