https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816388
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816388#c25
--- Comment #25 from Robert Milasan 2013-06-18 01:04:03 UTC ---
Are we 100% sure that setting the disk to 192 is a good idea for most disks?
There are disk (like in my case) that don't even have the APM_level, so setting
for this type of disks is just ignore I suppose, but for those that support
this, is it OK?
Anyway, if someone would like please test rule:
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="apm_level_end"
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="apm_level_end"
KERNEL=="sr*", GOTO="apm_level_end"
KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]|hd*[!0-9]", RUN+="/sbin/hdparm -B 192 /dev/$name"
LABEL="apm_level_end"
Here I'm not sure if ACTION should be both 'add' and 'change'. Add usually is
when the disk is added or at boot time and change is anytime that something
changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.