https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689494
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689494#c4
--- Comment #4 from Ned Ulbricht
Why is it a documentation bug if the default configuration is broken because of missing parts of the program?
The question I have regards developer intent. Is cronie-anacron now to be considered as part of the supported openSUSE "default configuration" ? Or is cronie-anacron just being shipped in the main repo because it's part of the now-default cronie? But broken off into a separate package because it's an optional extra for users who want it. If it's not to be considered part of the supported system default configuration, but an optional non-default configuration, then I think it's reasonable to expect users to read the documentation and configure it themselves. Up to and including grabbing a copy of run-parts from outside the main repo. Iow, an optional extra may be shipped with an example configuration file. The documentation that I don't see here is a signal from the packagers about their intent, and the expected use for the cronie-anacron package. Instead the rpm description just reads: "Anacron becames part of cronie...." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.