http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191777 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191777#c2 --- Comment #2 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska@suse.com> --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #1)
This is a false positive,
the SLPP clearly states that multiple libraries matching the same over suffix are allowed in one single package
in case of libpango-1_0-0:
rpm -ql libpango-1_0-0 /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0.4800.10 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.4800.10 /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.4800.10 /usr/lib64/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib64/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.4800.10 /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0 /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0/NEWS /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0/README.md /usr/share/licenses/libpango-1_0-0 /usr/share/licenses/libpango-1_0-0/COPYING
i.e the leading lib is libpango, and all the others match the -1_0-0 suffix
Hmm, the current rpmlint check does to detect the "leading lib". Where is this behavior documented? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.