Comment # 2 on bug 1191777 from Martin Li������ka

(In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #1)
> This is a false positive, 
> 
> the SLPP clearly states that multiple libraries matching the same over
> suffix are allowed in one single package
> 
> in case of libpango-1_0-0:
> 
> > rpm -ql libpango-1_0-0 
> /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0.4800.10
> /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.4800.10
> /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.4800.10
> /usr/lib64/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.4800.10
> /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0
> /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0/NEWS
> /usr/share/doc/packages/libpango-1_0-0/README.md
> /usr/share/licenses/libpango-1_0-0
> /usr/share/licenses/libpango-1_0-0/COPYING
> 
> 
> i.e the leading lib is libpango, and all the others match the -1_0-0 suffix

Hmm, the current rpmlint check does to detect the "leading lib".
Where is this behavior documented?