- openSUSE Bugs

[Bug 1234993] Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993#c6 --- Comment #6 from gilles renault <utilisateur.test(a)free.fr> --- Not better with an external HD. I can install windows 10 and Bazzite without problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1233738] New: SELINUX prevents XRDP from working when in enforcing mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233738 Bug ID: 1233738 Summary: SELINUX prevents XRDP from working when in enforcing mode Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: jmscdba(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi Cathy, In my test TW system that is using selinux I found that xrdp is not working. When you attempt to RDP after entering your credentials a dialog is displayed which says the login is successful but then it says VNC error - problem connecting some problem Error conneting to user session If I run "setenforce 0" after booting then xrdp works fine. If I watch the journal when selinux is enforcing I find: xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_unix(xrdp-sesman:session): session opened for user denise(uid=1001) by (uid=0) xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_open_session xrdp-sesman[6149]: pam_kwallet5: final socket path: /run/user/1001/kwallet5.socket xrdp-sesman[6150]: pam_kwallet5: could not execute kwalletd from /usr/bin/kwalletd6 xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_systemd(xrdp-sesman:session): New sd-bus connection (system-bus-pam-systemd-6092) opened. xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_unix(xrdp-sesman:session): session closed for user denise xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_close_session xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred systemd[1]: session-c7.scope: Deactivated successfully. ausearch shows these denied messages ausearch -ts boot | grep -i denied type=AVC msg=audit(1732232293.658:185): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2613 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/bin/kwalletd6" dev="sda2" ino=1779042 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 type=AVC msg=audit(1732232293.658:188): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2616 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/bin/bash" dev="sda2" ino=1719714 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 type=AVC msg=audit(1732232303.435:189): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2621 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/sbin/xrdp-chansrv" dev="sda2" ino=1455897 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 I'm still getting up to speed with selinux but it seems to me that xrdp tries to launch /usr/bin/xrdp-chansrv it is denied because there is no selinux policy to allow it, however, I thought when TARGETED mode was used then selinux would have allowed it ? Or does the package need to be updated to include a policy to allow xrdp so that it works in enforcing mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1234405] devel:microos/libeconf: Bug libeconf 0.7.5 causes systemd/sddm/pam/libc crash and prevents login
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234405 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234405#c15 --- Comment #15 from pallas wept <pallaswept(a)proton.me> --- (In reply to Stefan Schubert from comment #14) > Is this the right setting ? > https://github.com/openSUSE/libeconf/pull/229 Perhaps it is different between /usr/etc/environment.d and /etc/environment.d ? If that does not work in CI, I will test it here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234405] New: devel:microos/libeconf: Bug libeconf 0.7.5 causes systemd/sddm/pam/libc crash and prevents login
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234405 Bug ID: 1234405 Summary: devel:microos/libeconf: Bug libeconf 0.7.5 causes systemd/sddm/pam/libc crash and prevents login Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software Assignee: rbrown(a)suse.com Reporter: pallaswept(a)proton.me QA Contact: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 879108 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879108&action=edit output of `journalctl -b -2 |rg dumped -A 40` After today's dup, I rebooted to a desktop with a mouse cursor and otherwise unresponsive. Switching to a TTY showed an error "Unable to start user manager for user 1000". I was unable to login with any account including root. Using the recovery console, I was able to retrieve logs, find this culprit, rollback, and am currently working after locking out the libeconf updates with `sudo zypper al libeconf0 libeconf0-32bit libeconf-devel` Not sure if this is just me, hopefully it is. I did have some custom pam config, which I naturally removed to test, and there was no change, but I did notice that `rpm -qf /etc/pam.d/*` returns several "file foo is not owned by any package", and none of those files are mine. I'm not sure if this is intentional or if it is related. Relevant section of the journal is attached. Please let me know if I can help in any way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c27 --- Comment #27 from Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> --- OK, pushed into master now (with a cleanup of dependent options). Let's see how it goes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232906] New: ppc64(le) isn't building the latest bpftrace due unresolvable lldb-devel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232906 Bug ID: 1232906 Summary: ppc64(le) isn't building the latest bpftrace due unresolvable lldb-devel Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Slowroll Hardware: PowerPC-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: petr.vorel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Originally found in https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224403#c8 https://build.opensuse.org/projects/devel:tools/packages/bpftrace/repositor… "unresolvable: nothing provides lldb-devel" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c26 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- Hi > e8cb5712703d Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947)" > (bsc#1232727) > 89074471a397 Revert "Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE > (boo#1212947)" (bsc#1232727)" This inner cycle looks like a mistake and probably happened before the Plymouth bug reports came in. At least that's what I take from the commit messages. The fix for bsc#1232727 has been released in [1] ~3 weeks ago. That appears long enough to me to give some confidence in it. For the kernel config change I can prepare a test kernel and leave it out for another month or so. Let me also say that these interfaces are a constant source of bugs and security issues. [2] We have regular reports and no one seems to be able to get a hold on them. Dropping these interfaces is an improvement. [1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1228732 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fbdev/674dac63.050a0220.ad585.0050.GAE@google… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228173] sssd: getsubids throws `libsubid_sss.so did not provide @subid_free@`
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228173 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228173#c6 Samuel Cabrero <scabrero(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(scabrero(a)suse.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Samuel Cabrero <scabrero(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dylan Meysmans from comment #5) > (In reply to Samuel Cabrero from comment #4) > > (In reply to Dylan Meysmans from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Samuel Cabrero from comment #2) > > > > Fixed in sssd 2.10 beta2. > > > > > > When can we expect sssd 2.10 to arrive for Tumbleweed? I see it is already > > > in network:ldap. > > > > It will arrive soon, the OBS request is in place: > > https://build.opensuse.org/requests/1222104. Will need to wait for > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230051, though. > > It seems that bug has been closed for some time now. Which other issues > prevent sssd 2.10 from arriving for Tumbleweed? Hi Dylan, we have to adjust the location of the permissions file for Tumbleweed (https://src.opensuse.org/jengelh/sssd/pulls/5) and the whitelist for the new permissions file needs to be updated after the 2.10.1 release (bsc#1233131). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234995] libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995 Charles Arnold <carnold(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carnold(a)suse.com Assignee|virt-bugs(a)suse.de |jfehlig(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222748] RIP: 0010:rtR0MemObjLinuxApplyPageRange+0x6b/0xa0 [vboxdrv] and RIP: 0033:0x7fac1690f3df - virtualbox host
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222748 Charles Arnold <carnold(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|virt-bugs(a)suse.de |jengelh(a)inai.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234782] New: Kernel 6.12.6 with amdgpu breaks brightness control after resume
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234782 Bug ID: 1234782 Summary: Kernel 6.12.6 with amdgpu breaks brightness control after resume Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: fkrueger(a)mailbox.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Given TW20241220 with kernel 6.12.6 and resuming after suspend, the display brightness starts to increase until reaching its maximum value, and then switches off (Thinkpad T14 with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U). Since kernel version 6.12.4 works fine, I suspect that this was introduced with 6.12.5 and is due to commit 99a02eab82515343d536796aa917dee50aec1551 Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Date: Mon Nov 25 13:59:09 2024 -0500 drm/amdgpu: rework resume handling for display (v2) commit 73dae652dcac776296890da215ee7dec357a1032 upstream. Split resume into a 3rd step to handle displays when DCC is enabled on DCN 4.0.1. Move display after the buffer funcs have been re-enabled so that the GPU will do the move and properly set the DCC metadata for DCN. v2: fix fence irq resume ordering -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1180749] AMD Ryzen 4800H Renoir APU brightness control not working as found in some Lenovo Legion 5 15ARH05
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180749 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180749#c73 --- Comment #73 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1180749) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1234560 Factory / kernel-source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c25 --- Comment #25 from Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thomas Zimmermann from comment #23) > What are you talking about? This kernel option has been disabled exactly > once, which resulted in bsc#1232727. Apparently I mixed it with earlier FB related changes where we had similar apply/revert cycle pattern. But even for this option, this is actually third attempt to disable it: 7ce7d10b6941 config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947) 86e3964b14ac Revert "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947)" (bsc#1232727) e8cb5712703d Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947)" (bsc#1232727) 89074471a397 Revert "Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947)" (bsc#1232727)" 6a2cbc6bdb98 config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947) I don't think it should be so surprising that I have some doubts seeing the same claim (nobody needs this enabled any more) for the third time within few weeks after first two quickly turned out to be wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228318] kernel crash on two laptops during shutdown/reboot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228318 Eric Benton <erbenton(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NORESPONSE |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228318] kernel crash on two laptops during shutdown/reboot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228318 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228318#c8 Eric Benton <erbenton(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(erbenton@comcast. | |net) | --- Comment #8 from Eric Benton <erbenton(a)comcast.net> --- I gave up and reformated and reinstalled and haven't had any issue since. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234997] New: Bottles crashes upon launch. "Namespace Xdp not available"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234997 Bug ID: 1234997 Summary: Bottles crashes upon launch. "Namespace Xdp not available" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: Michael.Gusik(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- System: -OpenSuse Tumbleweed -[1] HP Laptop 17-cp0xxx & [2] Self-build Desktop -[1]&[2] Linux 6.12.6-1-default -[1] AMD Ryzen 5 5500U & [2] Intel I7-8700k -[1]&[2] KDE Plasma 6.2.4 -[1]&[2] KWin (Wayland) Bug: Bottles Crashes on startup. Console output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/bottles", line 49, in <module> from bottles.frontend import main File "/usr/share/bottles/bottles/frontend/main.py", line 29, in <module> gi.require_version("Xdp", "1.0") File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 122, in require_version raise ValueError('Namespace %s not available' % namespace) ValueError: Namespace Xdp not available Steps to Reproduce: -Have working installation -Execute: zypper dup -Described behaviour above Additional info: I had Bottles installed on both my laptop and my Main PC. It had been working since i was using OpenSuse Tumbleweed (ca. September 2024). After a recent update on my Main PC, Bottles refused to start with this exact behaviour. Attributing this to something i did wrong and not being willing to investigate, i put this topic aside. Today i updated my Laptop and the same thing happened, which leads me to believe, that this is a problem with the provided package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1211761] vtty[1-6] nouveau framebuffers produce vast snow/raster on right and bottom border areas on the larger resolution of two displays, in the absence of both plymouth and video= on linu lines
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761#c5 --- Comment #5 from Paul Graff <pj.opensuse(a)gmx.com> --- (In reply to Felix Miata from comment #4) > Upstream bug is not resolved, I added another GPU exhibiting problem (a > Kepler) only 2 weeks ago, and problem remains. I have a Nvidia Quadro K600 here but lack the skill to bisect. Would this card help resolve the issue if it's in the right hands? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234995] libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995#c2 --- Comment #2 from Ana Guerrero <ana.guerrero(a)suse.com> --- After some hours, libvirt successfully started building again. This is good news, but the issue consumed a significant amount of time today. I've revoked the SR. As previously noted, the build was failing intermittently in a few different places. I've attached one of the build logs for review. Hopefully, we can identify the cause of this transient failure and prevent it from happening again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234995] libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995#c1 --- Comment #1 from Ana Guerrero <ana.guerrero(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 879378 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879378&action=edit libvirt virtimetest 2025 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188954] black screen because dm tries to start before /dev/dri/card0 has been created during init
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188954 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188954#c45 Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(mrmazda@earthlink | |.net) | --- Comment #45 from Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> --- No wayland here, but it seems something may have changed that causes in most instances a retry in short order. Evidence from various hosts follows: gx280 (8086:2582): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 159.891] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 26 05:53:06 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 159.896] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 93.826] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 26 05:52:00 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 94.248] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) gx28b (1002:94c3): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 249.858] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Dec 20 00:44:59 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 249.866] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 249.878] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 191.902] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Dec 20 00:44:01 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 194.275] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 196.783] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 hp750 (8086:0042): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 114.930] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Dec 18 19:51:14 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 114.932] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 114.976] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 64.282] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Dec 18 19:50:24 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 64.485] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 64.746] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 fi965 (1002:6611): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 104.776] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Dec 10 22:21:40 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 106.164] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 106.993] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" to /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 107.557] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" options to /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 101.818] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Dec 10 22:12:29 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 102.608] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 103.528] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" to /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 104.091] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" options to /dev/dri/card0 hpg33 (1002:9498): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 99.539] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Dec 9 22:30:28 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 99.542] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 99.549] (II) Applying OutputClass "Radeon" to /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 57.664] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Dec 9 22:29:46 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 59.566] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 60.246] (II) Applying OutputClass "Radeon" to /dev/dri/card0 big31 (1002:95c0): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 91.943] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Nov 15 22:41:24 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 91.946] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 91.959] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 50.571] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Nov 15 22:40:44 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 51.429] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 51.855] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 gb970 (10de:0f00): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.550] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Nov 5 08:18:41 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.552] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 39.560] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 9.472] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Nov 5 08:18:11 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 9.511] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 9.511] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 9.512] (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. In other cases it seems I had to manually trigger a retry: ga88x (1002:130f): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 531.101] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 8 20:02:36 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 531.103] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 531.198] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card1 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 531.199] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" options to /dev/dri/card1 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 18.979] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 8 19:54:04 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 19.019] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 19.165] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card1 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 19.165] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" options to /dev/dri/card1 p5bse (10de:0fc1): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 599.921] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 15 17:50:55 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 599.923] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 599.937] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 58.967] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 15 17:41:54 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 59.410] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 59.917] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 mcp61 (10de:0402): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 728.494] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Dec 18 21:40:32 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 728.496] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 728.510] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 100.745] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Dec 18 22:31:15 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 101.937] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 104.473] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card0 All hosts above are old PCs. The following is my newest (Rocket Lake): ab560 (8086:4c8b): # egrep 'dev/dr\|Xorg.0.' /var/log/Xorg.0.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 61.294] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Oct 31 01:22:24 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 61.295] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1) /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 61.353] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card1 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 6.642] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Oct 31 01:21:30 2024 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 6.645] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1) /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[ 6.700] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card1 ab560 after the above instance doesn't seem any more have the issue, so it seems something may have changed after October to avoid the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1233887] New: Have installer not set enforcing=1 in grub config, so /etc/selinux/config is ignored
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233887 Bug ID: 1233887 Summary: Have installer not set enforcing=1 in grub config, so /etc/selinux/config is ignored Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: jsegitz(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com CC: cathy.hu(a)suse.com, mmeisters(a)suse.com, security-team(a)suse.de Depends on: 1232496 Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1232496 +++ sl micro 5.5 has enforcing=1 in grub config, so /etc/selinux/config is ignored should be removed, otherwise it is confusing for users why changing /etc/selinux/config does not do anything -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1234942] New: Maybe there are some incorrect configurations related to compiling Vim.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234942 Bug ID: 1234942 Summary: Maybe there are some incorrect configurations related to compiling Vim. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X11 Applications Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: hxliang666(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 879361 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879361&action=edit Comparison of Results **My system information, wsl2:** NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" # VERSION="20241226" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20241226" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" # CPE 2.3 format, boo#1217921 CPE_NAME="cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20241226:*:*:*:*:*:*:*" #CPE 2.2 format #CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20241226" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed" **Problem description:** 1. After opening CPP files with gVim and exiting insert mode, the gVim cursor reacts with a delay when changing from the vertical bar to the block, even though I have removed many of my Vim configurations. 2. To address this, I manually compiled gVim and observed a different result: everything works correctly, and no delay occurs. **gVim provided by the system** VIM - Vi IMproved 9.1 (2024 Jan 02) Included patches: 1-908 Compiled by 'http://www.opensuse.org/' Huge version with GTK3 GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): +acl +file_in_path +mouse_urxvt -tag_any_white +arabic +find_in_path +mouse_xterm -tcl +autocmd +float +multi_byte +termguicolors +autochdir +folding +multi_lang +terminal -autoservername -footer -mzscheme +terminfo +balloon_eval +fork() +netbeans_intg +termresponse +balloon_eval_term +gettext +num64 +textobjects +browse -hangul_input +packages +textprop ++builtin_terms +iconv +path_extra +timers +byte_offset +insert_expand +perl +title +channel +ipv6 +persistent_undo +toolbar +cindent +job +popupwin +user_commands +clientserver +jumplist +postscript +vartabs +clipboard +keymap +printer +vertsplit +cmdline_compl +lambda +profile +vim9script +cmdline_hist +langmap -python +viminfo +cmdline_info +libcall +python3/dyn +virtualedit +comments +linebreak +quickfix +visual +conceal +lispindent +reltime +visualextra +cryptv +listcmds +rightleft +vreplace +cscope +localmap +ruby/dyn +wildignore +cursorbind +lua/dyn +scrollbind +wildmenu +cursorshape +menu +signs +windows +dialog_con_gui +mksession +smartindent +writebackup +diff +modify_fname -sodium +X11 +digraphs +mouse -sound +xattr +dnd +mouseshape +spell -xfontset -ebcdic +mouse_dec +startuptime +xim +emacs_tags +mouse_gpm +statusline -xpm +eval -mouse_jsbterm -sun_workshop +xsmp_interact +ex_extra +mouse_netterm +syntax +xterm_clipboard +extra_search +mouse_sgr +tag_binary -xterm_save -farsi -mouse_sysmouse -tag_old_static system vimrc file: "/etc/vimrc" user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc" 2nd user vimrc file: "~/.vim/vimrc" 3rd user vimrc file: "~/.config/vim/vimrc" user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc" system gvimrc file: "/etc/gvimrc" user gvimrc file: "$HOME/.gvimrc" 2nd user gvimrc file: "~/.vim/gvimrc" 3rd user gvimrc file: "~/.config/vim/gvimrc" defaults file: "$VIMRUNTIME/defaults.vim" system menu file: "$VIMRUNTIME/menu.vim" fall-back for $VIM: "/usr/share/vim" Compilation: gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi2-atk/2.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi-2.0 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/libxkbcommon -I/usr/include/wayland -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -O2 -Wall -fstack-protector-strong -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -Werror=return-type -flto=auto -g -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -D_REENTRANT -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 Linking: gcc -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -flto=auto -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--as-needed -o vim -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lz -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lharfbuzz -latk-1.0 -lcairo-gobject -lcairo -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lSM -lICE -lXt -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lm -lselinux -ltinfo -lrt -lacl -lgpm -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -L/usr/local/lib64 -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -lperl -lm -ldl -lcrypt -lpthread **gVim Compiled by me** VIM - Vi IMproved 9.1 (2024 Jan 02, compiled Dec 31 2024 08:58:55) Included patches: 1-981 Compiled by banana@Banana Huge version with GTK3 GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): +acl +file_in_path +mouse_urxvt -tag_any_white +arabic +find_in_path +mouse_xterm -tcl +autocmd +float +multi_byte +termguicolors +autochdir +folding +multi_lang +terminal -autoservername -footer -mzscheme +terminfo +balloon_eval +fork() +netbeans_intg +termresponse +balloon_eval_term +gettext +num64 +textobjects +browse -hangul_input +packages +textprop ++builtin_terms +iconv +path_extra +timers +byte_offset +insert_expand +perl +title +channel +ipv6 +persistent_undo +toolbar +cindent +job +popupwin +user_commands +clientserver +jumplist +postscript +vartabs +clipboard +keymap +printer +vertsplit +cmdline_compl +lambda +profile +vim9script +cmdline_hist +langmap -python +viminfo +cmdline_info +libcall +python3 +virtualedit +comments +linebreak +quickfix +visual +conceal +lispindent +reltime +visualextra +cryptv +listcmds +rightleft +vreplace +cscope +localmap +ruby +wildignore +cursorbind +lua +scrollbind +wildmenu +cursorshape +menu +signs +windows +dialog_con_gui +mksession +smartindent +writebackup +diff +modify_fname -sodium +X11 +digraphs +mouse -sound +xattr +dnd +mouseshape +spell -xfontset -ebcdic +mouse_dec +startuptime +xim +emacs_tags -mouse_gpm +statusline -xpm +eval -mouse_jsbterm -sun_workshop -xsmp +ex_extra +mouse_netterm +syntax +xterm_clipboard +extra_search +mouse_sgr +tag_binary -xterm_save -farsi -mouse_sysmouse -tag_old_static system vimrc file: "$VIM/vimrc" user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc" 2nd user vimrc file: "~/.vim/vimrc" 3rd user vimrc file: "~/.config/vim/vimrc" user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc" system gvimrc file: "$VIM/gvimrc" user gvimrc file: "$HOME/.gvimrc" 2nd user gvimrc file: "~/.vim/gvimrc" 3rd user gvimrc file: "~/.config/vim/gvimrc" defaults file: "$VIMRUNTIME/defaults.vim" system menu file: "$VIMRUNTIME/menu.vim" fall-back for $VIM: "/usr/local/share/vim" Compilation: gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi2-atk/2.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi-2.0 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/libxkbcommon -I/usr/include/wayland -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -DWITH_GZFILEOP -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 Linking: gcc -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -Wl,--as-needed -o vim -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lz -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lharfbuzz -latk-1.0 -lcairo-gobject -lcairo -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXt -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lm -ltinfo -lselinux -L/usr/lib -llua5.4 -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -L/usr/local/lib64 -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/lib/perl5/5.40.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE -lperl -lm -ldl -lcrypt -lpthread -L/usr/lib64/python3.11/config-3.11-x86_64-linux-gnu -lpython3.11 -ldl -lm -lruby3.3 -lm -lpthread -L/usr/lib64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c24 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- Hi (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #21) > (In reply to Michal Kubeček from comment #20) > > Are you really sure that this time it is for real and we are not going to > > repeat the same dance again? Couldn't we at least wait until after 6.13 > > final to have a bit more time for testing before it hits Tumbleweed and > > its users? > > And perhaps ask users to test TW with Kernel:HEAD once it contains this > change. I can do that, but I feel like it wouldn't make much of a difference. As this change has been discussed on factory; only those participants would likely test anyway. > > Note I won't take this config change with the big master->stable merge. The > merge usually has enough its own bugs to solve. That's OK. I can prepare a separate change for stable. > > So either I take this into stable either before 5.13 merge (i.e. cherry-pick > it) or after (a revert during the big merge and > cherry-pick/revert-the-revert later) ;). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c23 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tzimmermann@suse. | |com) | --- Comment #23 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- Hi (In reply to Michal Kubeček from comment #20) > This has been going on for months and it is getting more and more > ridiculous. Please keep it professional. > The option has been disabled multiple times, each time with the > same reasoning ("nobody needs this any more") and each time with the same > result: getting reenabled within a week or two because it turns out it does > actually break something. What are you talking about? This kernel option has been disabled exactly once, which resulted in bsc#1232727. We reverted the kernel change to get the fix done. But bsc#1232727 has been trivial to resolve. The whole fallout that happened afterwards entirely goes back to the dire state that our Plymouth package is in. It is unrelated to the kernel's fbdev interface. > > Are you really sure that this time it is for real and we are not going to > repeat the same dance again? Couldn't we at least wait until after 6.13 > final to have a bit more time for testing before it hits Tumbleweed and > its users? I sent out a message to the factory list to collect possible use cases in Oct 2023. And then again a reminder in Oct 2024. [1] The two actionable use cases I heard about were fbiterm and the links web browser in 'graphics mode' (mentioned by a single person). We've removed the fbiterm in boo#1224053 in May 2024. The maintainer of links has been working on converting the program to DRM interface AFAIK. Meanwhile links continues to work in pure text mode. [1] https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223838] Nonfunctional brightness keys on Apple Macbook 5.1 (mcp79,nouveau)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223838 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223838#c64 --- Comment #64 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #63) > (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #19) > > The upstream submission: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240517110853.8481-1-tiwai@suse.de/ > > It somehow fell through the cracks. Care to ping them/resend? Done: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250102114944.11499-1-tiwai@suse.de/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234871] systemdboot_widgets shows undefined method >= for nil
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234871 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234871#c2 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Schubert <schubi(a)suse.com> --- >When converting my system from Legacy to sdboot /boot/efi is empty Hm, empty efi directory is strange. Have have you converted your system ? Is it an EFI system ? >I installed yast2-bootloader as https://microos.opensuse.org/blog/2023-12-20-sdboot-fde/ says yast2 has sdboot support It says: "Soon after the announcement, yast-bootloader gained support for it for new installations." So, the important word is "new installation" and not "migration" :-) Anyway, currently I cannot reproduce the error but perhaps we find a solution for it ..... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c22 --- Comment #22 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #21) > (In reply to Michal Kubeček from comment #20) > > Are you really sure that this time it is for real and we are not going to > > repeat the same dance again? Couldn't we at least wait until after 6.13 > > final to have a bit more time for testing before it hits Tumbleweed and > > its users? > > And perhaps ask users to test TW with Kernel:HEAD once it contains this > change. Or even build Kernel:stable + config.addon in your home and let users test that at first (I would once you post a link to the factory list). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234692] Moval of dbus-launch to dbus-daemon prevents start of Dolphin super user mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234692 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234692#c6 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Marin <christophe(a)krop.fr> --- (In reply to John Smith from comment #4) > The below update broke Dolphin's right click context menu functionality. > > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1231914 > > Right click> Open Folder With> File Manager - Super User Mode. > Fixed with https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1233825 it just needs a new snapshot to be released. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c21 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #21 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Michal Kubeček from comment #20) > Are you really sure that this time it is for real and we are not going to > repeat the same dance again? Couldn't we at least wait until after 6.13 > final to have a bit more time for testing before it hits Tumbleweed and > its users? And perhaps ask users to test TW with Kernel:HEAD once it contains this change. Note I won't take this config change with the big master->stable merge. The merge usually has enough its own bugs to solve. So either I take this into stable either before 5.13 merge (i.e. cherry-pick it) or after (a revert during the big merge and cherry-pick/revert-the-revert later) ;). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234995] New: libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995 Bug ID: 1234995 Summary: libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Virtualization:Other Assignee: virt-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: ana.guerrero(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- The `virtimetest` in libvirt started failing with the transition to the year 2025. This failure is blocking Tumbleweed development. I've created a Submit Request with a temporary fix: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1234542. I plan to accept it today in Factory to unblock development. However, this issue needs a more permanent solution, hence this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222902] Monitor detection fails after hard reset
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222902 Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mrmazda(a)earthlink.net | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234500] New: VUL-0: : singularity-ce: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234500 Bug ID: 1234500 Summary: VUL-0: : singularity-ce: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/432234/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: eich(a)suse.com Reporter: gianluca.gabrielli(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Blocks: 1234482 Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-45337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337 https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fb… https://go.dev/cl/635315 https://go.dev/issue/70779 https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3321 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/11/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331720 https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main//cves/2024/45xxx/CVE-2024… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c20 Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tzimmermann@suse. | |com) CC| |mkubecek(a)suse.com, | |tzimmermann(a)suse.com --- Comment #20 from Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> --- This has been going on for months and it is getting more and more ridiculous. The option has been disabled multiple times, each time with the same reasoning ("nobody needs this any more") and each time with the same result: getting reenabled within a week or two because it turns out it does actually break something. Are you really sure that this time it is for real and we are not going to repeat the same dance again? Couldn't we at least wait until after 6.13 final to have a bit more time for testing before it hits Tumbleweed and its users? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1211761] vtty[1-6] nouveau framebuffers produce vast snow/raster on right and bottom border areas on the larger resolution of two displays, in the absence of both plymouth and video= on linu lines
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761#c4 Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |--- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED --- Comment #4 from Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> --- Upstream bug is not resolved, I added another GPU exhibiting problem (a Kepler) only 2 weeks ago, and problem remains. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231599] hard freezes related to btusb device 04ca:3802
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231599 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231599#c29 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #29 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #16) > I pushed the tentative fix patch > https://lore.kernel.org/20240822052310.25220-1-hao.qin@mediatek.com > to TW kernel, so that the later 6.11.x TW kernel will contain the fix. > Meanwhile, the bug should be addressed in the upstream properly, and let's > keep this entry opened for that. FTR, there is some back and forth without any clear output yet (as of now) :/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234993] Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993#c5 --- Comment #5 from gilles renault <utilisateur.test(a)free.fr> --- This laptop have two small 60Go SSD, and when they are configured as a RAID0 the installer dont propose to install aeon on it. If I deactivate the RAID, the install failled the same way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1214773] ignition-fetch-offline failed on armv7l
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214773 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214773#c21 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tiwai(a)suse.com) --- Comment #21 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #14) > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #5) > > (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #4) > > > Could you give the lore URL to fetch the proper patch (or message-id to > > > fetch)? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2294036.ElGaqSPkdT@linux-e202.suse.de/ > > It appears as uncommitted in upstream. Care to repost? Still the same 8-). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223838] Nonfunctional brightness keys on Apple Macbook 5.1 (mcp79,nouveau)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223838 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223838#c63 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #63 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #19) > The upstream submission: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240517110853.8481-1-tiwai@suse.de/ It somehow fell through the cracks. Care to ping them/resend? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234993] Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993#c4 --- Comment #4 from gilles renault <utilisateur.test(a)free.fr> --- Created attachment 879377 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879377&action=edit dmidecode from the computer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234993] Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993#c3 --- Comment #3 from gilles renault <utilisateur.test(a)free.fr> --- Ok, I will try on an external drive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234977] New: AMD Internal digital microphone stopped working
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234977 Bug ID: 1234977 Summary: AMD Internal digital microphone stopped working Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Sound Assignee: tiwai(a)suse.com Reporter: helen(a)coldboot.plus.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Running Leap 15.6 as distributed, apart from the kernel parameter trace_clock=local. Leap 15.6 is up-to-date. Current kernel release is 6.4.0-150600.23.30-default. My machine is a Lenovo Thinkpad E16 Gen 2 (model 21M5) laptop with an AMD Rembrandt Radeon High Definition Audio card. The built in digital microphone was previously not working, but was fixed by the fix for Bug 1228269. However it stopped working on 14Dec2024, and is not working now. By booting from read-only snapshots, I suspect that a System Update which updated the kernel from 6.4.0-150600.23.25-default to 6.4.0-150600.23.30-default stopped it working. I suspect it may have been SUSE-SU-2024:4318-1, but I have not found a good way of relating system updates to the timestamp of snapshots taken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1234623] DPC: RP PIO log size 0 is invalid (quirk needs to be added)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234623 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234623#c2 --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 879376 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879376&action=edit Test fix patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234623] DPC: RP PIO log size 0 is invalid (quirk needs to be added)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234623 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234623#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(bjorn.lie(a)gmail.c | |om) CC| |bjorn.lie(a)gmail.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- It looks like that we need yet another quirk entry for 8086:a72f. I'm building a test kernel in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1234623. Once after the build finishes, could you try the test kernel there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234993] New: Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 Bug ID: 1234993 Summary: Installation failed at partitioning Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Aeon Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: rbrown(a)suse.com Reporter: utilisateur.test(a)free.fr QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0 Build Identifier: The installation stops after choosing the hard drive, with the message : systemd-repart failed Then the computer reboot Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. start installation on acer aspire s7-391 2. Select the first disk 3. Accept to erase the disk 4. Wait a little and the error raised Actual Results: After that the installation failed and the computer reboot Expected Results: The installation runs fine :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1234785] gns3[41834]: segfault at 28 ip 00007f76a7c36a30 sp 00007ffcc44e1bc0 error 4 in libpython3.11.so.1.0[236a30,7f76a7af3000+1d6000] likely on CPU 2 (core 4, socket 0)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234785 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |andrea(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234779] NetworkManager keeps losing connection intermittently
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234779 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |songchuan.kang(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234800] GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT does not work on encrypted system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234800 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |bootloader-maintainers@suse | |.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229085] irq/9-acpi high cpu usage with kernel 6.10.3-1-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229085 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229085#c28 Petr Valenta <petr(a)jevklidu.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED Flags|needinfo?(petr(a)jevklidu.cz) | --- Comment #28 from Petr Valenta <petr(a)jevklidu.cz> --- It should be closed. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234732] System Freeze with AMD Vega GPUs After Mesa 24.3.x Update & Kernel Logs Reveal Multiple AMD Driver Issues
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234732 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234732#c3 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo? CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com Priority|P0 - Crit Sit |P5 - None --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Please don't adjust the Priority field of Bugzilla. It's only for developer side. The bug description suggests it's a regression in Mesa. When you downgrade Mesa, is the problem gone? In anyway, it's at best to track this on the upstream bug tracker. It seems that there is already an entry (as in comment 1), so please follow up / update there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234619] CPU reporting and using incorrect max freq
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234619 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234619#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ez2blost(a)yahoo.co | |m) CC| |ez2blost(a)yahoo.com, | |giovanni.gherdovich(a)suse.co | |m, tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you give hwinfo output and dmesg output? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234879] [leap15.5 backport incident:18701:python-django-ckeditor.1733480956] nothing provides 'python311-django-js-asset >= 2.0' needed by the to be installed python311-django-ckeditor-6.7.2-bp155.3.3.1.noarch
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234879 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |mmachova(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234741] Only "systemd-boot" or "grub2-bls" are recognized (end of dup)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234741 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |bootloader-maintainers@suse | |.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234782] Kernel 6.12.6 with amdgpu breaks brightness control after resume
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234782 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234782#c7 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Pushed the fix from: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241227073700.3102801-1-alexander.deucher@amd.… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234774] rspamd 3.11.0 segfaults on Leap 15.6
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234774 Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrueckert(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234774] rspamd 3.11.0 segfaults on Leap 15.6
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234774 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234774#c1 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> --- I tried to reproduce this in a fresh distrobox container without systemd, but it did not segfault. Do I need to adapt some configuration to trigger this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234865] emacs-wayland startup failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234865 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |werner(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234939] DHCPd startup does not wait for device ready
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234939 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |max(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c19 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thomas Zimmermann from comment #5) > The config changes got merged into the master branch. It will likely reach > TW with the v6.12 kernel. I'm keeping this bug report open until then. Resubmitted to master after dealing with Plymouth fallout. If it sticks, it will reach stable with v6.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1200336] Wired network connection is insanely slow (except on speedtest.net)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200336 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200336#c13 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #13 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229441] [amdgpu] gfxhub page fault during 3d games
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229441 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229441#c6 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Closing this in a hope this got fixed upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229285] Xorg does not retrieve EDID properly, resulting in incorrect screen size (kernel-default 6.7 and above).
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229285 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229285#c9 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(djmenig(a)outlook.c | |om) CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #9 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- By a chance, has this been fixed in the meantime? I see there is not progress in the upstream tracker :/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234942] Maybe there are some incorrect configurations related to compiling Vim.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234942 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mimi.vx(a)gmail.com Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |martin.schreiner(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1227778] Raspberry Pi 5 cannot boot up to system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227778 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227778#c4 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #4 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- This is a WiP in upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229085] irq/9-acpi high cpu usage with kernel 6.10.3-1-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229085 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229085#c27 --- Comment #27 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- You forgot to remove the needinfo flag. By a chance, has this been fixed in the meantime? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234943] libtcl.so does not exist
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234943 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |max(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234692] Moval of dbus-launch to dbus-daemon prevents start of Dolphin super user mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234692 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Basesystem |KDE Applications Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse. | |org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1233220] Segmentation fault occurs when executing bpftrace command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233220 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233220#c14 --- Comment #14 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221183] Upgrade problems with clang-cpp
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221183 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221183#c30 --- Comment #30 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229868] llvm17 fails to build on aarch64
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229868 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229868#c6 --- Comment #6 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219405] older clang package depends on latest libLLVM
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219405 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219405#c9 --- Comment #9 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218701] llvm17 on i586: fails to build with RPM 4.19
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218701 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218701#c13 --- Comment #13 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212476] patch shebang line match the python version required in the package
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212476 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212476#c87 --- Comment #87 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2025:0004-1: An update that has seven fixes can now be installed. URL: https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-ru-20250004-1 Category: recommended (important) Bug References: 1212476, 1218701, 1219405, 1221183, 1229868, 1232906, 1233220 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:36864](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/36864/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 Development Tools Module 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (src): llvm17-17.0.6-150600.3.5.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229144] Brightness, media, printscrn, and other keys not working in Linux kernel 6.10.3-1 on Framework Laptop
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229144 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229144#c5 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Hopefully fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228318] kernel crash on two laptops during shutdown/reboot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228318 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228318#c7 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1227749] New: Orange PI 5 Plus limited functionality
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227749 Bug ID: 1227749 Summary: Orange PI 5 Plus limited functionality Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: aaron.w2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 876046 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=876046&action=edit idbloader for Orange PI 5 Plus I managed to get U-Boot running on the Orange PI 5 Plus with a couple of key SUSE patches to the point where it is booting into OpenSUSE AARCH64 Rockchip version. Currently only the following are working: - PCIe - NVME - eMMC/SD - Serial port The following are not working: - USB - Realtek RTL8125 2.5G Ethernet drivers (seen on PCIe bus) - Realtek RTL8852BE (seen on PCIe bus, not driver seems to be available) Note that in U-Boot that USB also does not work and the network cards are not supported (as of 7/15). I am attaching my U-Boot and idbloader for this board which should allow it to boot, use the usual offset 64 for the idbloader and offset 16384 for U-Boot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1226443] Kernel panic due to use of Wine
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226443 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226443#c7 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #7 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223194] Empty battery reported after suspend
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223194 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223194#c15 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #15 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Hopefully fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225217] OpenSUSE TW won’t boot without the “dis_ucode_ldr” parameter
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225217 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225217#c9 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #9 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223025] CPU soft lockup when suspending
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223025 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223025#c3 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #3 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1224769] Update failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224769 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224769#c2 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #2 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222578] MicroOS enters emergency.target when rebooted by transactional-update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222578 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222578#c4 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #4 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1211761] vtty[1-6] nouveau framebuffers produce vast snow/raster on right and bottom border areas on the larger resolution of two displays, in the absence of both plymouth and video= on linu lines
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

1 0

[Bug 1234978] Boot from second disk not supported (by upgrade and ISO boot image)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234978 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |bootloader-maintainers@suse | |.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218133] enable regulator modules (REGULATOR_MT6323, REGULATOR_MT6380, MFD_MT6397)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218133 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218133#c6 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE --- Comment #6 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- As soon as you provide the requested info, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222902] New: Monitor detection fails after hard reset
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222902 Bug ID: 1222902 Summary: Monitor detection fails after hard reset Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: david.mulder(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- After a hard reset (laptop locked up when I tried to suspend it), my external monitors are no longer detected. I've seen this happen 3 times in as many weeks (on several recent versions of TW), and the only solution I've found is reinstalling TW. > sudo hwinfo --monitor 45: None 00.0: 10002 LCD Monitor [Created at monitor.125] Unique ID: rdCR.iVNqLoWlvi7 Parent ID: _Znp.TcrQYGYoBS2 Hardware Class: monitor Model: "BOE CQ LCD Monitor" Vendor: BOE "BOE CQ" Device: eisa 0x0a7d Serial ID: "0" Resolution: 1920x1200@60Hz Size: 345x215 mm Year of Manufacture: 2021 Week of Manufacture: 27 Detailed Timings #0: Resolution: 1920x1200 Horizontal: 1920 1968 2000 2140 (+48 +80 +220) -hsync Vertical: 1200 1203 1209 1260 (+3 +9 +60) +vsync Frequencies: 161.79 MHz, 75.60 kHz, 60.00 Hz Driver Info #0: Max. Resolution: 1920x1200 Vert. Sync Range: 40-60 Hz Hor. Sync Range: 76-76 kHz Bandwidth: 161 MHz Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #39 (VGA compatible controller) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1222748] RIP: 0010:rtR0MemObjLinuxApplyPageRange+0x6b/0xa0 [vboxdrv] and RIP: 0033:0x7fac1690f3df - virtualbox host
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222748 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222748#c2 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Kernel |Virtualization:Other CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |virt-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #2 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- If this is still an issue, it's in vbox. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180749] AMD Ryzen 4800H Renoir APU brightness control not working as found in some Lenovo Legion 5 15ARH05
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180749 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180749#c72 --- Comment #72 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1180749) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1234489 Factory / kernel-source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234979] wezterm complaining about missing cursor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234979 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234979#c1 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |meissner(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> --- Hi Marcus Meissner, would you please help to take a look at this issue? I tried to assign this bug report to Soc Virnyl Estela, the maintainer of package wezterm, but it reports the name/email doesn't match anything. Please feel free to reassign, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234987] New: options snd-intel-dspcfg dsp_driver=2 loads Intel AVS driver instead of SST driver on kernel 6.12.6-1-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234987 Bug ID: 1234987 Summary: options snd-intel-dspcfg dsp_driver=2 loads Intel AVS driver instead of SST driver on kernel 6.12.6-1-default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: 64bit OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Sound Assignee: tiwai(a)suse.com Reporter: 95kreaninw95(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 879365 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879365&action=edit My alsa-info. After updating to kernel 6.12.6-1-default (currently on snapshot 20241226), I am no longer use the SST driver with options snd-intel-dspcfg dsp_driver=2 in /etc/modprobe.d/snd-intel.conf. Now, options snd-intel-dspcfg dsp_driver=2 loads the AVS driver instead, which is not usable in my system (showing as dummy), as shown in my alsa-info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1193250 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1193250] [META] Fully switch TW to DRM graphics drivers and disable fbdev drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193250 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1212947 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222098] tpm resource manager - tpm2_save-context failed with error 0x0901
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222098 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222098#c11 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM --- Comment #11 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #10) > Great, thanks! Your post appeared at > https://lore.kernel.org/all/424B3F10-D91C-4F47-B33C-BB66FE4DB91A@suse.de/ > Let's track there. Has this lead somewhere? I suppose this is an upstream bug (if at all) as noted above, so should be resolved there first. If there is anything we should/can backport, feel free to reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1193250] [META] Fully switch TW to DRM graphics drivers and disable fbdev drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193250 Bug 1193250 depends on bug 1232727, which changed state. Bug 1232727 Summary: [Build 20241101] openQA test fails in boot_encrypt: no decrypt prompt https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232727 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232727] [Build 20241101] openQA test fails in boot_encrypt: no decrypt prompt
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232727 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232727#c54 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED --- Comment #54 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- A fix for the bug has been accepted into Plymouth. See https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1228471 Resolving as FIXED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 Bug 1212947 depends on bug 1232727, which changed state. Bug 1232727 Summary: [Build 20241101] openQA test fails in boot_encrypt: no decrypt prompt https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232727 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188954] black screen because dm tries to start before /dev/dri/card0 has been created during init
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188954 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188954#c44 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(mrmazda@earthlink | |.net) CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com --- Comment #44 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- By a chance, has this been fixed in the meantime? My personal feeling: I doubt anyone will invest time debugging X.org and/or xdm. But perhaps you migrated to wayland in the meantime? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1197900] NetworkManager applet not visible using XFCE
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197900 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197900#c4 Jonathan Kang <songchuan.kang(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC| |songchuan.kang(a)suse.com --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Kang <songchuan.kang(a)suse.com> --- Just tested this in latest Tumbleweed and cannot re-produce this. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1206316] add_drivers+=" i915 " included in /etc/dracut.d/*, cause drm/dri issue(s) that delay initial X startup ~90 seconds
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206316 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206316#c8 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #6) > The manual tweak like yours might have some side effect, so likely a WONTFIX > issue. It appears so. We should fix bug 1188954 if not already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234985] "SDB:KDE repositories" provides misleading/incomplete information
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jan '25

01 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234985 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234985#c7 --- Comment #7 from Vadim Krevs <vkrevs(a)yahoo.com> --- Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234870] Virtualbox-guests-tools: /usr/lib/systemd/system/vboxclient.service: Unknown key 'ExecCondition' in section [Unit]
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jan '25

01 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234870 Charles Arnold <carnold(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|virt-bugs(a)suse.de |jengelh(a)inai.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0