January 2025 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1234774] rspamd 3.11.0 segfaults on Leap 15.6
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234774 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234774#c2 Marcus Rückert <mrueckert(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Marcus Rückert <mrueckert(a)suse.com> --- see the changes file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234053] Podman cannot create container in network
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234053 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234053#c10 Alexandre Vicenzi <alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Vicenzi <alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com> --- I'll close this because there's not much we can do on our side since we don't control the WSL kernel, but you can still recompile it to fix the issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1211761] vtty[1-6] nouveau framebuffers produce vast snow/raster on right and bottom border areas on the larger resolution of two displays, in the absence of both plymouth and video= on linu lines
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211761#c6 --- Comment #6 from Felix Miata <mrmazda(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Paul Graff from comment #5) > I have a Nvidia Quadro K600 here but lack the skill to bisect. Would this > card help resolve the issue if it's in the right hands? K600 is Kepler, so possibly yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234993] Installation failed at partitioning
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234993#c6 --- Comment #6 from gilles renault <utilisateur.test(a)free.fr> --- Not better with an external HD. I can install windows 10 and Bazzite without problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1233738] New: SELINUX prevents XRDP from working when in enforcing mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233738 Bug ID: 1233738 Summary: SELINUX prevents XRDP from working when in enforcing mode Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: jmscdba(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi Cathy, In my test TW system that is using selinux I found that xrdp is not working. When you attempt to RDP after entering your credentials a dialog is displayed which says the login is successful but then it says VNC error - problem connecting some problem Error conneting to user session If I run "setenforce 0" after booting then xrdp works fine. If I watch the journal when selinux is enforcing I find: xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_unix(xrdp-sesman:session): session opened for user denise(uid=1001) by (uid=0) xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_open_session xrdp-sesman[6149]: pam_kwallet5: final socket path: /run/user/1001/kwallet5.socket xrdp-sesman[6150]: pam_kwallet5: could not execute kwalletd from /usr/bin/kwalletd6 xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_systemd(xrdp-sesman:session): New sd-bus connection (system-bus-pam-systemd-6092) opened. xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_unix(xrdp-sesman:session): session closed for user denise xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_close_session xrdp-sesman[6092]: pam_kwallet5(xrdp-sesman:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred systemd[1]: session-c7.scope: Deactivated successfully. ausearch shows these denied messages ausearch -ts boot | grep -i denied type=AVC msg=audit(1732232293.658:185): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2613 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/bin/kwalletd6" dev="sda2" ino=1779042 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 type=AVC msg=audit(1732232293.658:188): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2616 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/bin/bash" dev="sda2" ino=1719714 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 type=AVC msg=audit(1732232303.435:189): avc: denied { transition } for pid=2621 comm="xrdp-sesman" path="/usr/sbin/xrdp-chansrv" dev="sda2" ino=1455897 scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=0 I'm still getting up to speed with selinux but it seems to me that xrdp tries to launch /usr/bin/xrdp-chansrv it is denied because there is no selinux policy to allow it, however, I thought when TARGETED mode was used then selinux would have allowed it ? Or does the package need to be updated to include a policy to allow xrdp so that it works in enforcing mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1234405] devel:microos/libeconf: Bug libeconf 0.7.5 causes systemd/sddm/pam/libc crash and prevents login
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234405 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234405#c15 --- Comment #15 from pallas wept <pallaswept(a)proton.me> --- (In reply to Stefan Schubert from comment #14) > Is this the right setting ? > https://github.com/openSUSE/libeconf/pull/229 Perhaps it is different between /usr/etc/environment.d and /etc/environment.d ? If that does not work in CI, I will test it here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c27 --- Comment #27 from Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> --- OK, pushed into master now (with a cleanup of dependent options). Let's see how it goes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212947] Disable fbdev userspace interfaces and programs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212947#c26 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- Hi > e8cb5712703d Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE (boo#1212947)" > (bsc#1232727) > 89074471a397 Revert "Reapply "config: Disable CONFIG_FB_DEVICE > (boo#1212947)" (bsc#1232727)" This inner cycle looks like a mistake and probably happened before the Plymouth bug reports came in. At least that's what I take from the commit messages. The fix for bsc#1232727 has been released in [1] ~3 weeks ago. That appears long enough to me to give some confidence in it. For the kernel config change I can prepare a test kernel and leave it out for another month or so. Let me also say that these interfaces are a constant source of bugs and security issues. [2] We have regular reports and no one seems to be able to get a hold on them. Dropping these interfaces is an improvement. [1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1228732 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fbdev/674dac63.050a0220.ad585.0050.GAE@google… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228173] sssd: getsubids throws `libsubid_sss.so did not provide @subid_free@`
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228173 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228173#c6 Samuel Cabrero <scabrero(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(scabrero(a)suse.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Samuel Cabrero <scabrero(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dylan Meysmans from comment #5) > (In reply to Samuel Cabrero from comment #4) > > (In reply to Dylan Meysmans from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Samuel Cabrero from comment #2) > > > > Fixed in sssd 2.10 beta2. > > > > > > When can we expect sssd 2.10 to arrive for Tumbleweed? I see it is already > > > in network:ldap. > > > > It will arrive soon, the OBS request is in place: > > https://build.opensuse.org/requests/1222104. Will need to wait for > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230051, though. > > It seems that bug has been closed for some time now. Which other issues > prevent sssd 2.10 from arriving for Tumbleweed? Hi Dylan, we have to adjust the location of the permissions file for Tumbleweed (https://src.opensuse.org/jengelh/sssd/pulls/5) and the whitelist for the new permissions file needs to be updated after the 2.10.1 release (bsc#1233131). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234995] libvirt: libvirt: virtimetest failing with the change to year 2025
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234995 Charles Arnold <carnold(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carnold(a)suse.com Assignee|virt-bugs(a)suse.de |jfehlig(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0