September 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1221183] New: Upgrade problems with clang-cpp
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Nov '24

17 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221183 Bug ID: 1221183 Summary: Upgrade problems with clang-cpp Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Upgrade Problems Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: franz.sirl-obs(a)lauterbach.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi, during a "zypper --releasever=15.6 dup" upgrade from a fully up-to-date 15.5 installation I got the following messages: Checking for file conflicts: ...................................................................................................................................................................[error] Detected 4 file conflicts: File /usr/bin/clang-cpp from install of clang17-17.0.6-150600.1.13.x86_64 (Main Repository) conflicts with file from install of clang13-13.0.1-bp156.7.42.x86_64 (Main Repository) File /usr/bin/clang-cpp from install of clang17-17.0.6-150600.1.13.x86_64 (Main Repository) conflicts with file from package clang11-11.0.1-150300.3.6.1.x86_64 (@System) File /usr/bin/clang-cpp from install of clang17-17.0.6-150600.1.13.x86_64 (Main Repository) conflicts with file from package clang15-15.0.7-150500.4.4.1.x86_64 (@System) File /usr/bin/clang-cpp from install of clang17-17.0.6-150600.1.13.x86_64 (Main Repository) conflicts with file from package clang7-7.0.1-150100.3.22.2.x86_64 (@System) File conflicts happen when two packages attempt to install files with the same name but different contents. If you continue, conflicting files will be replaced losing the previous content. Continue? [yes/no] (no): yes Even though this is mostly harmless, it disturbs the upgrade experience and probably can be easily fixed by backporting the clang-cpp/update-alternatives change from clang17 to the other clang versions that are part of Leap. regards, Franz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1219405] New: older clang package depends on latest libLLVM
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Nov '24

17 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219405 Bug ID: 1219405 Summary: older clang package depends on latest libLLVM Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: shung-hsi.yu(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Trying to install older clang will pull in the latest llvm package (libclang13 and libLLVM17): > $ zypper install clang16 # (latest is clang17 at the moment) > > The following 11 NEW packages are going to be installed: > clang16 libLLVM16 libLLVM17 libclang-cpp16 libclang-cpp17 libclang13 > libedit0 libmpdec3 libpython3_11-1_0 python311-base update-alternatives The problem is likely that c-index-test-16 is incorrectly linked to /lib64/libclang.so.13 that is created from the latest llvm package (llvm17 at the moment), and that ends up making it linked to both the latest llvm shared library (libLLVM.so.17 from llvm17) as well as one in the corresponding package (libLLVM.so.16 from llvm16). > $ ldd /usr/bin/c-index-test-16.0.6 > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffce2336000) > libclang.so.13 => /lib64/libclang.so.13 (0x00007fb21ca18000) > libclang-cpp.so.16 => /lib64/libclang-cpp.so.16 (0x00007fb218800000) > libxml2.so.2 => /lib64/libxml2.so.2 (0x00007fb218690000) > libLLVM.so.16 => /lib64/libLLVM.so.16 (0x00007fb211200000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fb210e00000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb210a00000) > libclang-cpp.so.17 => /lib64/libclang-cpp.so.17 (0x00007fb20c800000) > libLLVM.so.17 => /lib64/libLLVM.so.17 (0x00007fb205200000) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb21c92f000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb21cb11000) > libz.so.1 => /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v3/libz.so.1.3 (0x00007fb218676000) > liblzma.so.5 => /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v3/liblzma.so.5.4.5 (0x00007fb21863d000) > libedit.so.0 => /lib64/libedit.so.0 (0x00007fb218601000) > libtinfo.so.6 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007fb2111c5000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fb2111a0000) c-index-test-16.0.6 thus will segfault when ran > #0 0x00007fccc253d319 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/lib64/libLLVM.so.17+0x3b3d319) > #1 0x00007fccc253aed2 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/lib64/libLLVM.so.17+0x3b3aed2) > #2 0x00007fccc253db9b (/lib64/libLLVM.so.17+0x3b3db9b) > #3 0x00007fccca23f190 __restore_rt (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3f190) > #4 0x00007fccc724587a (/lib64/libclang-cpp.so.17+0x124587a) > #5 0x00007fccca2414e1 __cxa_finalize (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x414e1) > #6 0x00007fccc719c0f7 (/lib64/libclang-cpp.so.17+0x119c0f7) > Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1229061] New: Laptop that will only run Plasma/Wayland, not Plasma X11
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229061 Bug ID: 1229061 Summary: Laptop that will only run Plasma/Wayland, not Plasma X11 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: 64bit OS: openSUSE Leap 15.5 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: marc(a)marcchamberlin.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 876623 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=876623&action=edit xsession-errors file When I try to use the Plasma/X11 desktop, after a reboot I reach the KDE login screen OK. If I choose to log in with the Plasma/X11 desktop, after entering my login name and password, the screen just goes blank for a moment, then cycles back and re-brings up the login/password screen again. Apparently the Plasma/X11 version of the desktop is not accepting my login credentials for some reason. However, if I choose to brings up the Plasma/Wayland desktop, my login credentials work just fine and the desktop comes up OK. I have attached a copy of my .xsession-errors file hoping that might offer a clue. (Guess I can only add one attachment at a time) will add results of doing a hw-probe -all in a follow on post. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1230331] New: docker: add Requires for docker-buildx
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230331 Bug ID: 1230331 Summary: docker: add Requires for docker-buildx Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Containers Assignee: containers-bugowner(a)suse.de Reporter: asarai(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- The standard built-in "docker build" has been marked as deprecated since Docker 23.0[1]. It is not yet planned for deletion, but given that it will probably not receive any updates we should probably mark docker-buildx as Requires. [1]: https://docs.docker.com/engine/deprecated/#legacy-builder-fallback -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1230333] New: docker-buildx: move to be a subpackage of Docker
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230333 Bug ID: 1230333 Summary: docker-buildx: move to be a subpackage of Docker Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Containers Assignee: containers-bugowner(a)suse.de Reporter: asarai(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- docker-buildx is a component of Docker, it makes very little sense to maintain it as a separate package (especially since docker-stable will probably mean we need to maintain a docker-stable-buildx fork anyway). It's simplest to just maintain it as a subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1215403] New: SDDM default display-manager cannot login to X11 desktop
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215403 Bug ID: 1215403 Summary: SDDM default display-manager cannot login to X11 desktop Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: ajbudge(a)errichel.co.uk QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- With TW as OS and KDE desktop, when running SDDM as default-displaymanager after boot login will only work with Plasma (Wayland) desktop. Selecting X11 and logging in goes dark and then after a few seconds returns to login screen. journal gives me:- Sep 16 09:22:04 HP-Z640-1 sddm-helper[2134]: Starting X11 session: "" "/usr/etc/X11/xdm/Xsession \"/usr/bin/startplasma-x11\"" Sep 16 09:22:04 HP-Z640-1 sddm[1851]: Session started false Sep 16 09:22:04 HP-Z640-1 sddm-helper[2134]: [PAM] Closing session Sep 16 09:22:04 HP-Z640-1 sddm-helper[2134]: [PAM] Ended. Sep 16 09:22:04 HP-Z640-1 sddm[1851]: Auth: sddm-helper exited with 2 and there is nothing in /etc/sddm.conf.d> or /.local/share/sddm> cat xorg-session.log (nothing here) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1230189] New: All the packages installed on the system are not available from the Leap Micro 6.0 repositories
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230189 Bug ID: 1230189 Summary: All the packages installed on the system are not available from the Leap Micro 6.0 repositories Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Leap Micro Version: 6.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com Reporter: xavier.coulon(a)suse.com QA Contact: jalausuch(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- All the packages installed on the system are not available from the Leap Micro 6.0 repositories. On a fresh install of Leap Micro 6.0: The main repo is available and enabled: # zypper lr Repository priorities are without effect. All enabled repositories share the same priority. # | Alias | Name | Enabled | GPG Check | Refresh --+----------------------+-------------------+---------+-----------+-------- 1 | openSUSE:repo-debug | repo-debug (6.0) | No | ---- | ---- 2 | openSUSE:repo-main | repo-main (6.0) | Yes | (r ) Yes | Yes 3 | openSUSE:repo-source | repo-source (6.0) | No | ---- | ---- If I search a package like NetworkManager: # zypper search -s NetworkManager Refreshing service 'openSUSE'. Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository ---+----------------------------------+---------+-------------+--------+------------------ i | cockpit-networkmanager | package | 309-5.3 | noarch | (System Packages) i+ | NetworkManager | package | 1.42.6-5.14 | x86_64 | (System Packages) i+ | NetworkManager-branding-openSUSE | package | 42.1-1.1 | noarch | (System Packages) i+ | NetworkManager-tui | package | 1.42.6-5.14 | x86_64 | (System Packages) Repository is (System Packages). The package can't be found in the repositories. but for another package like kernel-default: # zypper search -s kernel-default Refreshing service 'openSUSE'. Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository ---+----------------------+---------+-----------------+--------+---------------- v | kernel-default | package | 6.4.0-18.1 | x86_64 | repo-main (6.0) i+ | kernel-default | package | 6.4.0-17.1 | x86_64 | repo-main (6.0) | kernel-default-base | package | 6.4.0-17.1.1.51 | x86_64 | repo-main (6.0) | kernel-default-extra | package | 6.4.0-18.1 | x86_64 | repo-main (6.0) | kernel-default-extra | package | 6.4.0-17.1 | x86_64 | repo-main (6.0) Repository is repo-main (6.0). The package is available in repositories. I checked in the repositories and all the packages are available. But all the packages are not listed in repositories metadata. The impact for me is that I can't build Leap Micro image with Kiwi because a part of packages are not available from the repositories. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1230851] New: [Build 20240918] System Keyboard Layout setting doesn't work for tty
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230851 Bug ID: 1230851 Summary: [Build 20240918] System Keyboard Layout setting doesn't work for tty Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4493319/modules/keyb oard_layout_gdm/steps/24 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: grace.wang(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: yfjiang(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: --- ## Observation System Keyboard Layout setting doesn't work for tty Simple ways to reproduce this issue: Login to desktop -> Launch YaST2 Keyboard -> Change the keyboard layout to German -> Apply the changes -> Switch to another tty -> Input string "qwertz" and observe the characters displayed on the tty Actual Result: It shows "qwertz". Expected Result: It should show "qwerty" because we are using the German keyboard layout. openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_gnome@64bit fails in [keyboard_layout_gdm](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4493319/modules/keyb… ## Test suite description Maintainer: QE Core, asmorodskyi. Extra tests which were designed to run on gnome ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20240528](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4231828) ## Expected result Last good: [20240527](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4227928) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1230010] New: /.snapshots not mountable during boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230010 Bug ID: 1230010 Summary: /.snapshots not mountable during boot Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: MicroOS Assignee: forgotten_u0-bnvADNc(a)user.net Reporter: kukuk(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 877086 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=877086&action=edit journalctl -b output I had this now the second time in a few days, every time a different MicroOS machine: after reboot machine is stuck in sulogin, because /.snapshots could not be mounted. Reading the logs I noticed that wtmpdb got again started before dbus-broker, but I don't know if the wrong ordering is a followup error or the root cause (see bsc#1229813). This machine is using systemd-boot with FDE+TPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1213139] New: [Build 20230706] openQA test fails in consoletest_setup: vmalloc error in kernel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213139 Bug ID: 1213139 Summary: [Build 20230706] openQA test fails in consoletest_setup: vmalloc error in kernel Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3412937/modules/cons oletest_setup/steps/52 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes Randomly (currently every ~4th run), the test fails because systemd-vconsole-setup fails to complete. The kernel spits out an allocation failure: [ 519.853569] systemd-vconsol: vmalloc error: size 0, page order 9, failed to allocate pages, mode:0xcc2(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_HIGHMEM), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 [ 519.854619] CPU: 0 PID: 11361 Comm: systemd-vconsol Not tainted 6.3.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 4b767630dbc263131e96e89ef291fd4fd2951892 [ 519.855385] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 519.855860] Call Trace: [ 519.856047] <TASK> [ 519.856208] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60 [ 519.856455] warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0 [ 519.856693] ? __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350 [ 519.857009] __vmalloc_node_range+0x631/0x8b0 [ 519.857343] ? con_font_op+0x193/0x430 [ 519.857593] kvmalloc_node+0xa6/0xd0 [ 519.857857] ? con_font_op+0x193/0x430 [ 519.858105] con_font_op+0x193/0x430 [ 519.858346] ? __pfx_bpf_lsm_capable+0x10/0x10 [ 519.858631] ? security_capable+0x44/0x70 [ 519.858891] vt_ioctl+0x834/0x1380 [ 519.859126] tty_ioctl+0x4b1/0x870 [ 519.859355] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x94/0xd0 [ 519.859601] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 [ 519.859871] ? exc_page_fault+0x6e/0x150 [ 519.860129] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [ 519.860447] RIP: 0033:0x7f1144d0c2cf [ 519.860710] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 18 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 [ 519.861757] RSP: 002b:00007ffe520b5af0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 519.862201] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe520b5c10 RCX: 00007f1144d0c2cf [ 519.862843] RDX: 00007ffe520b5bf0 RSI: 0000000000004b72 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 519.863463] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 519.864093] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 519.864705] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 519.865317] </TASK> [ 519.865681] Mem-Info: [ 519.866038] active_anon:34752 inactive_anon:94983 isolated_anon:0 active_file:120769 inactive_file:114642 isolated_file:0 unevictable:3088 dirty:1160 writeback:0 slab_reclaimable:23978 slab_unreclaimable:21653 mapped:30383 shmem:4200 pagetables:3497 sec_pagetables:0 bounce:0 kernel_misc_reclaimable:0 free:66953 free_pcp:198 free_cma:0 [ 519.881932] Node 0 active_anon:139008kB inactive_anon:379932kB active_file:483076kB inactive_file:458568kB unevictable:12352kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:121532kB dirty:4640kB writeback:0kB shmem:16800kB shmem_thp: 0kB shmem_pmdmapped: 0kB anon_thp: 61440kB writeback_tmp:0kB kernel_stack:8040kB pagetables:13988kB sec_pagetables:0kB all_unreclaimable? no [ 519.893364] Node 0 DMA free:8220kB boost:0kB min:328kB low:408kB high:488kB reserved_highatomic:0KB active_anon:32kB inactive_anon:1908kB active_file:1564kB inactive_file:2136kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:15000kB managed:14364kB mlocked:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB [ 519.903019] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1889 1889 1889 1889 [ 519.905153] Node 0 DMA32 free:259592kB boost:0kB min:44724kB low:55904kB high:67084kB reserved_highatomic:16384KB active_anon:138976kB inactive_anon:378024kB active_file:481512kB inactive_file:456432kB unevictable:12352kB writepending:4640kB present:2076960kB managed:1966804kB mlocked:16kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:792kB local_pcp:792kB free_cma:0kB [ 519.915738] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 0 [ 519.917815] Node 0 DMA: 31*4kB (UME) 13*8kB (UME) 10*16kB (UM) 21*32kB (UME) 20*64kB (UM) 10*128kB (UME) 2*256kB (UE) 2*512kB (UE) 1*1024kB (E) 1*2048kB (E) 0*4096kB = 8228kB [ 519.920264] Node 0 DMA32: 20402*4kB (UMEH) 7366*8kB (UMEH) 2957*16kB (UMEH) 1109*32kB (UMEH) 359*64kB (UMEH) 66*128kB (UMEH) 11*256kB (MH) 4*512kB (MH) 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 259624kB [ 519.922145] Node 0 hugepages_total=0 hugepages_free=0 hugepages_surp=0 hugepages_size=1048576kB [ 519.923229] Node 0 hugepages_total=0 hugepages_free=0 hugepages_surp=0 hugepages_size=2048kB [ 519.924415] 262294 total pagecache pages [ 519.925139] 22685 pages in swap cache [ 519.925777] Free swap = 1663652kB [ 519.926439] Total swap = 2097148kB [ 519.927082] 522990 pages RAM [ 519.927676] 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly [ 519.928332] 27698 pages reserved [ 519.929181] 0 pages cma reserved [ 519.929828] 0 pages hwpoisoned If the system was actually out of RAM, I'd expect it to fail earlier in random places already. ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-upgrade_Leap_15.2_cryptlvm@uefi fails in [consoletest_setup](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3412937/modules/consol… ## Test suite description Upgrade scenario with cryptlvm for Leap 15.2 Set QEMUVGA=virtio due to bsc#1210555 ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230401](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3205451) ## Expected result Last good: (unknown) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2