August 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1228704] Freeipa not built for leap 15.6+
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228704 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228704#c3 --- Comment #3 from Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> --- 15.5 and 15.6 build enabled. 15.6 seems to fail for some unrelated reason currently. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1049997] system:install:head/patterns-base: pattern minimal_base not available
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049997 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049997#c8 --- Comment #8 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1049997) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1190984 Factory / mkosi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212963] AUDIT-0: review of selinux policy for kanidm-unixd tools and clients
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212963 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212963#c7 Johannes Segitz <jsegitz(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Johannes Segitz <jsegitz(a)suse.com> --- lets close this bug here. It's not really an AUDIT and with the current state I would prefer individual bugs for different problems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228728] system marked as tainted: unmerged-bin
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728#c3 Antonio Feijoo <antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Normal |Enhancement Assignee|systemd-maintainers(a)suse.de |screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #3 from Antonio Feijoo <antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Marcus Rückert from comment #2) > but shouldnt it then be "unmerged-sbin" because our /{usr,}bin are merged. Yes, I could agree with you that this name would make more sense, but I doubt systemd upstream would change it at this point, since v256 was already released. > if that merge is useful is to be discussed ... Yes, changing the severity to enhancement. Also resetting the assignee, because we don't want to diverge from systemd upstream and avoiding this warning, and this work would require involvement at the distribution level. FTR, link to the Fedora proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226541] Cockpit Packagekit does not appear in UI
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226541 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226541#c2 Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(cody.henderson@su | |se.com) CC| |robert.simai(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> --- I can't duplicate and I'm a bit confused. On my TW systems /lib is a symbolic link to usr/lib which makes the path valid and the module appears as expected. You're saying this is different on your system? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1227908] New: auditd obsolete built-in options
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227908 Bug ID: 1227908 Summary: auditd obsolete built-in options Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4344305/modules/jour nal_check/steps/15 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: mloviska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: jeos-internal(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: No Created attachment 876065 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=876065&action=edit first boot log ## Observation Messages reporting obsolete options used have been found in the journal after firstboot of openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Minimal-VM.x86_64-1.0.0-Cloud-Snapshot20240715.qcow2 image. > Jul 16 04:26:51.145571 localhost systemd[1]: Starting Update is Completed... > Jul 16 04:26:51.185487 localhost auditd[1255]: Option builtin_af_unix line 10 is obsolete - using /sbin/audisp-af_unix > Jul 16 04:26:51.185493 localhost auditd[1255]: Option builtin line 11 is obsolete - update it > Jul 16 04:26:51.186062 localhost systemd[1]: Finished Update is Completed. > Jul 16 04:26:51.186340 localhost auditd[1255]: No plugins found, not dispatching events > Jul 16 04:26:51.186555 localhost auditd[1255]: Init complete, auditd 3.1.1 listening for events (startup state enable) > Jul 16 04:26:51.187204 localhost systemd[1]: Started Security Auditing Service. openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-JeOS-for-OpenStack-Cloud-x86_64-jeos-no-cloud@64bit_virtio fails in [journal_check](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4344305/modules/journal_ch… ## Reproducible Image was tested previously in openQA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1228659] Snapshot 20240730 - unbootable after transactional-update dup
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659#c16 Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(kukuk(a)suse.com) --- Comment #16 from Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> --- > > * libsystemd v255 instead of v256 > > It is present in some systems, and not in others. I do not see it in this > bug report log. > > * No ESP detected. Legacy system? > > That is sdbootutil complaining when boot_root cannot be found. I am trying > to reproduce this one, and can be related with systemd 256 update, as is > fetched from bootctl. > > I can focused in this last one. In my situation both of the above quoted issues were resolved by first updating systemd & systemd-boot, then rebooting, then doing a dup with everything else So it might not be worthwhile trying to split the baby but could make sense to consider the issues interlinked As Thorsten cannot fix his issue with a workaround I’m going to ask - can you provide a log of your failing transactional-updates? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228659] Snapshot 20240730 - unbootable after transactional-update dup
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659#c15 --- Comment #15 from Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> --- Also, as this issue seems to be affecting MicroOS sdboot systems as well as Aeon, plus considering I’m on vacation from tomorrow evening.. I’d like to invite someone more appropriate to take the bug assignment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228659] Snapshot 20240730 - unbootable after transactional-update dup
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228659#c13 Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(aplanas(a)suse.com) --- Comment #13 from Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thorsten Kukuk from comment #12) > (In reply to Richard Brown from comment #11) > > in addition to the /etc/sysconfig/bootloader workaround > > This workaround does not work for me. That’s good to know.. but then I’m at a loss as to how to workaround the blocked transactional-updates My suspicion is that the sdbootutil tukit plugin is still trying to call libsystemd v255 even though the snapshot now has v256 That would explain the 255 not found so errors But I’m no expert on sdbootutil nor the tukit plugin Alberto, any ideas? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1228691] YaST2 cannot display Chinese characters properly.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228691 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228691#c8 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED --- Comment #8 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- This is the font situation in TW-20240131: 1:vm4877:~ # fc-list :lang=zh /usr/share/fonts/misc/b16.pcf.gz: Efont Biwidth:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/truetype/uming.ttc: AR PL UMing TW MBE:style=Light /usr/share/fonts/truetype/uming.ttc: AR PL UMing TW:style=Light /usr/share/fonts/truetype/uming.ttc: AR PL UMing CN:style=Light /usr/share/fonts/truetype/uming.ttc: AR PL UMing HK:style=Light But b16.pcf is now gone - this was the font used by fbiterm - which was dropped recently. TL;DR: the YaST UI does not reflect (in all places) the updated font config after adding the Chinese font package correctly. In the past, this led to a mix of bitmap and truetype glyphs. Now that the bitmap font is gone, this leads to missing glyphs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0