July 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1220571] [META] Packages failing because GCC 14+ treats some warnings as errors
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220571 Bug 1220571 depends on bug 1225854, which changed state. Bug 1225854 Summary: Package libgpod does not build with gcc14 because of new errors https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225854 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225854] Package libgpod does not build with gcc14 because of new errors
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225854 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225854#c2 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Request was accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225063] [Firmware Bug]: CPU 0: APIC ID mismatch. CPUID: 0x0000 APIC: 0x0010
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225063 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225063#c5 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jshand2013@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- The early 6.9.x kernel had some issues. Please retest with the latest 6.9.x kernel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225982] mtools: Add missing dependency on glibc-gconv-modules-extra
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225982 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225982#c3 --- Comment #3 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Hello Daan, (In reply to Klaus Kämpf from comment #1) > @mls - shouldn't we rather add virtual provides/requires for gconv modules? > (Like "Provides gconv(codepage:850)" or similar) will use ordinary Requires in the meantime in case there is no complaint. Feel free to test: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Base:/System/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217688] New: mariadb: a table is missing inserted entries from concurrent processes
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217688 Bug ID: 1217688 Summary: mariadb: a table is missing inserted entries from concurrent processes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-32871 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: danilo.spinella(a)suse.com Reporter: jslaby(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 871082 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=871082&action=edit db inserter With mariadb: 11.0.2, 11.1.2 and 11.1.3 (from server:database): From my c++ code, using connector-c, I do: SET autocommit=0 CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS sources(id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY, src VARCHAR(1024) NOT NULL UNIQUE) INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES (?) START TRANSACTION And then a lot of: INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003431-00001') src is composed of pid and values from 0 to 49. So they are all unique. Finally, I do: COMMIT If I run 10 instances in parallel like: for aa in {1..10} ; do ./db & done ; wait I see: select count(id), substr(src,5,6) as sss from sources group by sss; +-----------+--------+ | count(id) | sss | +-----------+--------+ | 50 | 003430 | | 50 | 003431 | | 50 | 003432 | | 40 | 003433 | | 50 | 003434 | | 50 | 003435 | | 50 | 003436 | | 50 | 003437 | | 50 | 003438 | | 50 | 003439 | +-----------+--------+ I.e. Some of pids stored only last 40 values, numbers 0..9 are missing in the table: select src from sources where src like '%003433%' order by src ; +------------------+ | src | +------------------+ | src-003433-00010 | | src-003433-00011 | | src-003433-00012 | | src-003433-00013 | | src-003433-00014 | | src-003433-00015 | | src-003433-00016 | | src-003433-00017 | | src-003433-00018 | | src-003433-00019 | | src-003433-00020 | | src-003433-00021 | | src-003433-00022 | | src-003433-00023 | | src-003433-00024 | | src-003433-00025 | | src-003433-00026 | | src-003433-00027 | | src-003433-00028 | | src-003433-00029 | | src-003433-00030 | | src-003433-00031 | | src-003433-00032 | | src-003433-00033 | | src-003433-00034 | | src-003433-00035 | | src-003433-00036 | | src-003433-00037 | | src-003433-00038 | | src-003433-00039 | | src-003433-00040 | | src-003433-00041 | | src-003433-00042 | | src-003433-00043 | | src-003433-00044 | | src-003433-00045 | | src-003433-00046 | | src-003433-00047 | | src-003433-00048 | | src-003433-00049 | +------------------+ Is this a bug in my program (attached) or the db? If I look into the general log, I see the inserts which apparently did not get into the table: grep src-003433 /tmp/glog 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00000') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00000') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00000') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00000') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00000') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00001') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00002') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00003') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00004') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00005') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00006') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00007') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00008') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00009') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00010') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00010') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00011') 24 Execute INSERT IGNORE INTO sources(src) VALUES ('src-003433-00012') Note also the repeated inserts. They come from a deadlock, so I repeat the exec in a loop (see the code). Dockers with mariadb:latest (11.2.2) mariadb:11.1.3 mariadb:11.1.2 all run FINE too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 1227165] New: VUL-0: CVE-2024-24792: gomuks: golang.org/x/image/tiff: parsing of a corrupt or malicious image with invalid color indices can cause a panic
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227165 Bug ID: 1227165 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2024-24792: gomuks: golang.org/x/image/tiff: parsing of a corrupt or malicious image with invalid color indices can cause a panic Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/412299/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: mcepl(a)suse.com Reporter: camila.matos(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de CC: camila.matos(a)suse.com, security-team(a)suse.de, smash_bz(a)suse.de Blocks: 1227158 Target Milestone: --- Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1227158 +++ Parsing a corrupt or malicious image with invalid color indices can cause a panic. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-24792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24792 https://go.dev/cl/588115 https://go.dev/issue/67624 https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-2937 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1227462] Stressapptest (Package): Process Error: Sat::Initialize() failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227462 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227462#c2 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard JoRo <bejoro(a)gmx.net> --- Thank you for your reply. The identical error occurred with the previous version 1.0.9. The provided option -A uses the "degraded mode" and therefore a less thorough hardware testing. The versions in Fedora 1.0.9 and Arch (AUR) 1.0.11 work perfectly fine on all of my tested systems. It is no hw compatibility issue. Please check if there is something wrong with the build options (debug?). Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223615] New: Nextcloud-desktop can't add multiple accounts
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223615 Bug ID: 1223615 Summary: Nextcloud-desktop can't add multiple accounts Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: karlggest(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Seems since some Nextcloud-desktop versions app can't show add account option in the menu. Steps: 1. Start Nextcloud-desktop 2. Click on the app on system tray, main window appears. 3. Click on dropdown menu. Add accounts appears. 4. Add the first account. Complain all details and finish. 5. Go to steps 2, 3 and 4 again. Add accounts option does not appear I try app from standard repo and flatpak package. Both fails. Appimage from https://nextcloud.com/install/#install-clients works as expected. Extra: Another packages even in another distros fails in the same way: https://help.nextcloud.com/t/nextcloud-desktop-client-with-support-for-mult… https://help.nextcloud.com/t/desktop-clients-number-of-multiple-accounts/10… Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1227405] [Build 20240703] openQA test fails in python_scientific
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227405 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227405#c4 Steve Kowalik <steven.kowalik(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #4 from Steve Kowalik <steven.kowalik(a)suse.com> --- I have pushed up a PR, https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/19678 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225633] New: Migration from MicroOS Desktop to Aeon failed on none EFI system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225633 Bug ID: 1225633 Summary: Migration from MicroOS Desktop to Aeon failed on none EFI system Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Aeon Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: rbrown(a)suse.com Reporter: vortex(a)z-ray.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 875210 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=875210&action=edit tik install log file Hey there, was about to migrate one of my MicroOS Desktop installs to Aeon using the Aeon installer image. After it had backed up the old home, installing the new system and moving the home directory back it failed with the error message: "Command /usr/sbin/efibootmgr -o FAILED" I am aware that Aeon does not support none EFI systems. Might it be possible to do a EFI check before installing everything and tell the user? The full log does confirm that EFI is not enabled. It was just my idiocy that I forgot to enable EFI on my old Laptop beforehand. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3