June 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1225881] Whole system hangs up / freezes when Input switched on external monitor on Thinkpad T14 G2 AMD with Ultra Dock
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225881 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225881#c2 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse. |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |org | CC| |fvogt(a)suse.com Component|KDE Workspace (Plasma) |Kernel --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- > Can't switch to terminal only mode (ctrl+alt+F keys) either, so it's not just KDE that's hanging. -> kernel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1224404] New: Missing framebuffer during boot on aarch64
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224404 Bug ID: 1224404 Summary: Missing framebuffer during boot on aarch64 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3891664/modules/ansi ble/steps/31 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: dracut-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Depends on: 1219180 Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1219180 +++ Unless the initrd is built with the platform native DRM driver (e.g. virtio_gpu), there is no graphical output during boot. This also means that entering a passphrase for unlocking the root fs is not possible. On x86 it uses the EFI framebuffer successfully, but on aarch64 dmesg has no trace of efifb/simplefb/simpledrm. The original bug report has some more details, but the summary is that efifb or other builtin drivers don't work with virtio-gpu-pci. To get any display output at all, the virtio-gpu module is needed. From a dracut PoV, the crypt module should probably pull in drm if virtio-gpu is detected? ## Observation openQA test in scenario microos-Tumbleweed-MicroOS-Image-sdboot-aarch64-microos-wizard@aarch64 fails in [ansible](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3891664/modules/ansible/steps/31) ## Test suite description Like MicroOS, but use neither combustion nor ignition for the intial configuration, so jeos-firstboot runs. ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20231129](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3771195) ## Expected result Last good: [20231127](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3763820) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=aarch64&distri=microo… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1225892] New: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl 'Sysctl_kernel_yama_ptrace_scope' is changed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225892 Bug ID: 1225892 Summary: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl 'Sysctl_kernel_yama_ptrace_scope' is changed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysc tl/steps/168 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes Created attachment 875291 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=875291&action=edit openQA test result ## Description I can see below error messages when testing sysctl on tw ># Test messages # Sysctl_kernel_yama_ptrace_scope ># failure: >expected: 0 >returned: 1 >invalid value: '1', expected '0' Can I ask for your kindly confirmation if it is by design? ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-sys-param-check@64bit fails in [Sysctl](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysctl/steps/168) ## Test suite description RAM size is set to 2048, some kernel parameters change with total RAM https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230910](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3565003) ## Expected result Last good: [20230908](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3562695) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1225893] New: [tw][Build 20240531] Sysctl 'Sysctl_net_core_optmem_max' value is changed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225893 Bug ID: 1225893 Summary: [tw][Build 20240531] Sysctl 'Sysctl_net_core_optmem_max' value is changed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysc tl/steps/194 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes Created attachment 875292 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=875292&action=edit openQA test result ## Description I can see below error message when testing sysctl on tw: ># Test messages # Sysctl_net_core_optmem_max ># failure: >expected: 20480 >returned: 131072 >invalid value: '131072', expected '20480' The same test passed 3 months ago, see https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4008446 Can you please confirm it is a product bug or by design? thanks ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-sys-param-check@64bit fails in [Sysctl](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysctl/steps/194) ## Test suite description RAM size is set to 2048, some kernel parameters change with total RAM https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230910](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3565003) ## Expected result Last good: [20230908](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3562695) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223587] windows:mingw:win{32|64}: not present email address hib@hiberis.nl in bug tracker
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223587 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223587#c3 --- Comment #3 from Fridrich Strba <fstrba(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #2) > This address also needs to be removed from > https://en.opensuse.org/Template:Mingw_new_bug, which is used on the project > page https://en.opensuse.org/Build:projects:windows:mingw:win32 Wow, I did not even remember about the Wiki page. I must be getting really old. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225891] New: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl 'Sysctl_fs_inotify_max_user_watches' value is changed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225891 Bug ID: 1225891 Summary: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl 'Sysctl_fs_inotify_max_user_watches' value is changed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysc tl/steps/31 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Applications Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes Created attachment 875290 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=875290&action=edit openqa test reusult ## Description From sysctl test logs, I can see below errors: # Test messages # Sysctl_fs_inotify_max_user_watches # failure: expected: 15070%0.5 returned: 14959 invalid value: '14959', expected '14994:15145' The same test passed 3 months ago, see https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4008446#step/Sysctl/31 Is it a product bug or by design/feature? ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-sys-param-check@64bit fails in [Sysctl](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysctl/steps/31) ## Test suite description RAM size is set to 2048, some kernel parameters change with total RAM https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230910](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3565003) ## Expected result Last good: [20230908](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3562695) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1220403] New: VUL-0: CVE-2024-23837: libhtp: excessive processing time of HTTP headers can lead to denial of service
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220403 Bug ID: 1220403 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2024-23837: libhtp: excessive processing time of HTTP headers can lead to denial of service Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/395171/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: otto.hollmann(a)suse.com Reporter: smash_bz(a)suse.de QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de CC: carlos.lopez(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- LibHTP is a security-aware parser for the HTTP protocol. Crafted traffic can cause excessive processing time of HTTP headers, leading to denial of service. This issue is addressed in 0.5.46. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-23837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23837 https://github.com/OISF/libhtp/commit/20ac301d801cdf01b3f021cca08a22a87f477… https://github.com/OISF/libhtp/security/advisories/GHSA-f9wf-rrjj-qx8m https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6444 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1225890] New: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl kernel parameter 'sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first: No such file or directory'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225890 Bug ID: 1225890 Summary: [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl kernel parameter 'sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first: No such file or directory' Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysc tl/steps/135 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Description From tw setup, I can see below error on sysctl test: # Test messages # Sysctl_kernel_sched_child_runs_first # failure: 255 - sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first: No such file or directory The issue is not seen on sle15sp6 [the int value is '0'] Is it a new kernel feature or a product bug? ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-sys-param-check@64bit fails in [Sysctl](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4241601/modules/Sysctl/steps/135) ## Test suite description RAM size is set to 2048, some kernel parameters change with total RAM https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230910](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3565003) ## Expected result Last good: [20230908](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3562695) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1223587] New: windows:mingw:win{32|64}: not present email address hib@hiberis.nl in bug tracker
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223587 Bug ID: 1223587 Summary: windows:mingw:win{32|64}: not present email address hib(a)hiberis.nl in bug tracker Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software Assignee: fstrba(a)suse.com Reporter: ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de QA Contact: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de CC: fridrich.strba(a)bluewin.ch, mkbosmans(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- When opening new bugs for the mingw32|64 project, the mentioned email address is entered in the CC field. Submitting the bug then fails with the error message that this email address does not exist. This email address should be removed from the ticket system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1225877] windows:mingw:win{32|64}/mingw{32|64}-gcc
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '24

04 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225877 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225877#c1 Fridrich Strba <fstrba(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|fstrba(a)suse.com |ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Fridrich Strba <fstrba(a)suse.com> --- Please, Ralf, don't assign me this kind of bugs. I have no time to work on it at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0