June 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1226105] Snapshot 20240606 breaks libvirt NAT networks
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226105 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226105#c7 Alexander Graul <alexander.graul(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(alexander.graul@s | |use.com) | --- Comment #7 from Alexander Graul <alexander.graul(a)suse.com> --- I have these nftables / iptables packages installed: ➤ zypper se -i '/(nf|ip)tables.*/' S | Name | Summary | Type --+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------- i | iptables | IP packet filter administration utilities | package i | iptables-backend-nft | Metapackage to make nft the default backend for iptables/arptables/ebtables | package i | libnftables1 | nftables firewalling command interface | package i | nftables | Userspace utility to access the nf_tables packet filter | package i | python311-nftables | Python bindings for nftables | package The 'nft list ruleset ip' output is a bit long for a comment, I'll add it as an attachment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226025] Tumbleweed cannot get upgraded by 'zypper dup'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226025 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226025#c8 Zaoliang Luo <zluo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Zaoliang Luo <zluo(a)suse.com> --- I tested again, this issue has nothing to with non-oss repository. I can now upgrade von 20240606 to 20240610. I assume that new snapshot was not released at that time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226206] New: [doc] Configure the connected network cards typos in example code
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226206 Bug ID: 1226206 Summary: [doc] Configure the connected network cards typos in example code Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation Assignee: fs(a)suse.com Reporter: philip(a)kauffman.me QA Contact: fs(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Configure the connected network cards : https://doc.opensuse.org/projects/autoyast/#id-1.9.6.4.6.5.5 Fixed code: ``` <interfaces t="list"> <% with_link = network_cards.sort_by { |n| n[:name] }.find { |n| n[:link] } %> <% if with_link %> <interface> <device><%= with_link[:device] %></device> <startmode>auto</startmode> <bootproto>dhcp</bootproto> </interface> <% end %> </interfaces> ``` diff ``` --- a 2024-06-12 01:47:05.108761194 -0600 +++ b 2024-06-12 01:46:47.648892157 -0600 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ <interfaces t="list"> - <% with_link = netword_cards.sort_by { |n| n[:name] }.find { |n| n[:link] } %> + <% with_link = network_cards.sort_by { |n| n[:name] }.find { |n| n[:link] } %> <% if with_link %> <interface> <device><%= with_link[:device] %></device> <startmode>auto</startmode> <bootproto>dhcp</bootproto> </interface> - <% end > + <% end %> </interfaces> ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226122] TW installation with bootloader not managed leaves /boot/ empty when suse-module-tools-scriptlets not installed instead of sdbootutil-rpm-scriptlets
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226122 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226122#c30 --- Comment #30 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- From the latest TW full media: sdbootutil Supplements: (systemd-boot and shim) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226122] TW installation with bootloader not managed leaves /boot/ empty when suse-module-tools-scriptlets not installed instead of sdbootutil-rpm-scriptlets
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226122 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226122#c29 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(mrmazda@earthlink | |.net) --- Comment #29 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 875434 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=875434&action=edit Bootloader settings Guys, aren't you just picking the wrong bootloader choice? As the YaST team sees it, "Not Managed" means ... "not managed", but if you select "Systemd Boot", then it should really select the package you wish and use systemd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225927] Package setserial does not build with gcc14 because of new errors
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225927 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225927#c1 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |simonf.lees(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Simon seems to maintain that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1226205] VUL-0: chromium,ungoogled-chromium: multiple vulnerabilities fixed in 126.0.6478.54
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226205 Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223783] Upgrade lapack to 3.12.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223783 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223783#c20 --- Comment #20 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Atri Bhattacharya from comment #19) > > > > Would you mind setting the package in your home to 'publish' so I'm actually > > able to install it? > > Done, sorry for overlooking this earlier when I set up the repo. Thanks! I will test later today. BTW: I've created https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/issues/1010 as I believe it is still worthwhile to pursue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223967] %suse_build_hwcaps_libs fails to generate -x86_64-v3 packages when shared library is an update-alternatives link
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223967 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223967#c17 --- Comment #17 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- The current baselibs.conf still uses the apparently broken | liblapack3 | -/usr/lib(64)?/liblapack.so.3 directive I've therefore created https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/issues/1010 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225994] [Build 20240605-2] gnuhealth starts failed with "trytond" package version=6.0.46
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Jun '24

12 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225994 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225994#c3 --- Comment #3 from Richard Fan <richard.fan(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Axel Braun from comment #2) > I can confirm that his happens as well on an installation on a clean 15.5 > system. Looks like a regression from upstream. > Do you know which was the last working trytond version? The version I tested was `zypper_call "install --oldpackage trytond=6.0.38-bp155.2.15.1";` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0