May 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1221770] trousers: missing udevadm dependency on Leap
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221770 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221770#c4 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #4 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- The update process for SLE-15-SP4 based products is still ongoing. I just realized that trousers has been forked for SP6, so I just submitted to SP6 directly. The change will hopefully become available soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222929] nsjail fails to build on Leap 15.6 error: variable or field 'LogHandler' declared void
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222929 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222929#c2 Max Lin <mlin(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlin(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Max Lin <mlin(a)suse.com> --- this needs protobuf21 as the compromise solution, nsjail won't build with newer protobuf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223544] kernel config: enable CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223544 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223544#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hare(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(hare(a)suse.com) --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Actually this config has been already enabled on SLE15 since years ago (bsc#1175995,jsc#SLE-15608). It's just missing on stable/master branch. Hannes, I suppose we should take it to master/stable branch, too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223619] Unexpected messages from rtl8812au regarding address ("Current addr" vs. "Expected addr")
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223619 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alarrosa(a)suse.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223305] [Regression] Bluetooth audio devices reset/disconnected/audio profile changed(??) when wine/proton applications initialize sound
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223305 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223305#c5 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|tiwai(a)suse.com |alarrosa(a)suse.com --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Antonio, any clue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221713] Kernel compilation fails after update from 5.14.21-150500.55.49.1 to 5.14.21-150500.55.52.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221713 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221713#c21 --- Comment #21 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2024:1490-1: An update that solves 183 vulnerabilities, contains three features and has 38 security fixes can now be installed. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1177529, 1192145, 1194869, 1200465, 1205316, 1207948, 1209635, 1209657, 1212514, 1213456, 1214852, 1215221, 1215322, 1217339, 1217829, 1217959, 1217987, 1217988, 1217989, 1218321, 1218336, 1218479, 1218643, 1218777, 1219126, 1219169, 1219170, 1219264, 1219834, 1220114, 1220176, 1220237, 1220251, 1220320, 1220337, 1220340, 1220365, 1220366, 1220398, 1220411, 1220413, 1220439, 1220443, 1220445, 1220466, 1220478, 1220482, 1220484, 1220486, 1220487, 1220492, 1220703, 1220775, 1220790, 1220797, 1220831, 1220833, 1220836, 1220839, 1220840, 1220843, 1220870, 1220871, 1220872, 1220878, 1220879, 1220883, 1220885, 1220887, 1220898, 1220901, 1220915, 1220918, 1220920, 1220921, 1220926, 1220927, 1220929, 1220932, 1220935, 1220937, 1220938, 1220940, 1220954, 1220955, 1220959, 1220960, 1220961, 1220965, 1220969, 1220978, 1220979, 1220981, 1220982, 1220983, 1220985, 1220986, 1220987, 1220989, 1220990, 1221009, 1221012, 1221015, 1221022, 1221039, 1221040, 1221044, 1221045, 1221046, 1221048, 1221055, 1221056, 1221058, 1221060, 1221061, 1221062, 1221066, 1221067, 1221068, 1221069, 1221070, 1221071, 1221077, 1221082, 1221090, 1221097, 1221156, 1221162, 1221252, 1221273, 1221274, 1221276, 1221277, 1221291, 1221293, 1221298, 1221337, 1221338, 1221375, 1221379, 1221551, 1221553, 1221613, 1221614, 1221616, 1221618, 1221631, 1221633, 1221713, 1221725, 1221777, 1221791, 1221814, 1221816, 1221830, 1221951, 1222011, 1222033, 1222051, 1222056, 1222060, 1222070, 1222073, 1222117, 1222247, 1222266, 1222274, 1222291, 1222300, 1222304, 1222317, 1222331, 1222355, 1222356, 1222360, 1222366, 1222373, 1222416, 1222422, 1222427, 1222428, 1222431, 1222437, 1222445, 1222449, 1222503, 1222520, 1222536, 1222549, 1222550, 1222557, 1222585, 1222586, 1222596, 1222609, 1222610, 1222619, 1222630, 1222632, 1222660, 1222662, 1222664, 1222669, 1222677, 1222678, 1222680, 1222706, 1222720, 1222724, 1222726, 1222727, 1222764, 1222772, 1222781, 1222784, 1222798, 1222801, 1222952, 1223030, 1223067, 1223068 CVE References: CVE-2021-46925, CVE-2021-46926, CVE-2021-46927, CVE-2021-46929, CVE-2021-46930, CVE-2021-46931, CVE-2021-46933, CVE-2021-46936, CVE-2021-47082, CVE-2021-47087, CVE-2021-47091, CVE-2021-47093, CVE-2021-47094, CVE-2021-47095, CVE-2021-47096, CVE-2021-47097, CVE-2021-47098, CVE-2021-47099, CVE-2021-47100, CVE-2021-47101, CVE-2021-47102, CVE-2021-47104, CVE-2021-47105, CVE-2021-47107, CVE-2021-47108, CVE-2021-47181, CVE-2021-47182, CVE-2021-47183, CVE-2021-47185, CVE-2021-47189, CVE-2022-4744, CVE-2022-48626, CVE-2022-48629, CVE-2022-48630, CVE-2023-0160, CVE-2023-28746, CVE-2023-35827, CVE-2023-4881, CVE-2023-52447, CVE-2023-52450, CVE-2023-52453, CVE-2023-52454, CVE-2023-52469, CVE-2023-52470, CVE-2023-52474, CVE-2023-52476, CVE-2023-52477, CVE-2023-52481, CVE-2023-52484, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2023-52488, CVE-2023-52492, CVE-2023-52493, CVE-2023-52494, CVE-2023-52497, CVE-2023-52500, CVE-2023-52501, CVE-2023-52502, CVE-2023-52503, CVE-2023-52504, CVE-2023-52507, CVE-2023-52508, CVE-2023-52509, CVE-2023-52510, CVE-2023-52511, CVE-2023-52513, CVE-2023-52515, CVE-2023-52517, CVE-2023-52518, CVE-2023-52519, CVE-2023-52520, CVE-2023-52523, CVE-2023-52524, CVE-2023-52525, CVE-2023-52528, CVE-2023-52529, CVE-2023-52532, CVE-2023-52561, CVE-2023-52563, CVE-2023-52564, CVE-2023-52566, CVE-2023-52567, CVE-2023-52569, CVE-2023-52574, CVE-2023-52575, CVE-2023-52576, CVE-2023-52582, CVE-2023-52583, CVE-2023-52587, CVE-2023-52591, CVE-2023-52594, CVE-2023-52595, CVE-2023-52597, CVE-2023-52598, CVE-2023-52599, CVE-2023-52600, CVE-2023-52601, CVE-2023-52602, CVE-2023-52603, CVE-2023-52604, CVE-2023-52605, CVE-2023-52606, CVE-2023-52607, CVE-2023-52608, CVE-2023-52612, CVE-2023-52615, CVE-2023-52617, CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52621, CVE-2023-52623, CVE-2023-52627, CVE-2023-52628, CVE-2023-52632, CVE-2023-52636, CVE-2023-52637, CVE-2023-52639, CVE-2023-6356, CVE-2023-6535, CVE-2023-6536, CVE-2023-7042, CVE-2023-7192, CVE-2024-0841, CVE-2024-2201, CVE-2024-22099, CVE-2024-23307, CVE-2024-23850, CVE-2024-25739, CVE-2024-25742, CVE-2024-26599, CVE-2024-26600, CVE-2024-26602, CVE-2024-26612, CVE-2024-26614, CVE-2024-26620, CVE-2024-26627, CVE-2024-26629, CVE-2024-26642, CVE-2024-26645, CVE-2024-26646, CVE-2024-26651, CVE-2024-26654, CVE-2024-26659, CVE-2024-26660, CVE-2024-26664, CVE-2024-26667, CVE-2024-26670, CVE-2024-26680, CVE-2024-26681, CVE-2024-26684, CVE-2024-26685, CVE-2024-26689, CVE-2024-26695, CVE-2024-26696, CVE-2024-26697, CVE-2024-26704, CVE-2024-26717, CVE-2024-26718, CVE-2024-26722, CVE-2024-26727, CVE-2024-26733, CVE-2024-26736, CVE-2024-26737, CVE-2024-26743, CVE-2024-26744, CVE-2024-26745, CVE-2024-26747, CVE-2024-26749, CVE-2024-26751, CVE-2024-26754, CVE-2024-26760, CVE-2024-26763, CVE-2024-26766, CVE-2024-26769, CVE-2024-26771, CVE-2024-26776, CVE-2024-26779, CVE-2024-26787, CVE-2024-26790, CVE-2024-26793, CVE-2024-26798, CVE-2024-26805, CVE-2024-26807, CVE-2024-26848 Jira References: PED-5759, PED-7167, PED-7619 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:33538](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/33538/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1220775] Kernel oops on aws M6g.metal
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220775 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220775#c37 --- Comment #37 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2024:1490-1: An update that solves 183 vulnerabilities, contains three features and has 38 security fixes can now be installed. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1177529, 1192145, 1194869, 1200465, 1205316, 1207948, 1209635, 1209657, 1212514, 1213456, 1214852, 1215221, 1215322, 1217339, 1217829, 1217959, 1217987, 1217988, 1217989, 1218321, 1218336, 1218479, 1218643, 1218777, 1219126, 1219169, 1219170, 1219264, 1219834, 1220114, 1220176, 1220237, 1220251, 1220320, 1220337, 1220340, 1220365, 1220366, 1220398, 1220411, 1220413, 1220439, 1220443, 1220445, 1220466, 1220478, 1220482, 1220484, 1220486, 1220487, 1220492, 1220703, 1220775, 1220790, 1220797, 1220831, 1220833, 1220836, 1220839, 1220840, 1220843, 1220870, 1220871, 1220872, 1220878, 1220879, 1220883, 1220885, 1220887, 1220898, 1220901, 1220915, 1220918, 1220920, 1220921, 1220926, 1220927, 1220929, 1220932, 1220935, 1220937, 1220938, 1220940, 1220954, 1220955, 1220959, 1220960, 1220961, 1220965, 1220969, 1220978, 1220979, 1220981, 1220982, 1220983, 1220985, 1220986, 1220987, 1220989, 1220990, 1221009, 1221012, 1221015, 1221022, 1221039, 1221040, 1221044, 1221045, 1221046, 1221048, 1221055, 1221056, 1221058, 1221060, 1221061, 1221062, 1221066, 1221067, 1221068, 1221069, 1221070, 1221071, 1221077, 1221082, 1221090, 1221097, 1221156, 1221162, 1221252, 1221273, 1221274, 1221276, 1221277, 1221291, 1221293, 1221298, 1221337, 1221338, 1221375, 1221379, 1221551, 1221553, 1221613, 1221614, 1221616, 1221618, 1221631, 1221633, 1221713, 1221725, 1221777, 1221791, 1221814, 1221816, 1221830, 1221951, 1222011, 1222033, 1222051, 1222056, 1222060, 1222070, 1222073, 1222117, 1222247, 1222266, 1222274, 1222291, 1222300, 1222304, 1222317, 1222331, 1222355, 1222356, 1222360, 1222366, 1222373, 1222416, 1222422, 1222427, 1222428, 1222431, 1222437, 1222445, 1222449, 1222503, 1222520, 1222536, 1222549, 1222550, 1222557, 1222585, 1222586, 1222596, 1222609, 1222610, 1222619, 1222630, 1222632, 1222660, 1222662, 1222664, 1222669, 1222677, 1222678, 1222680, 1222706, 1222720, 1222724, 1222726, 1222727, 1222764, 1222772, 1222781, 1222784, 1222798, 1222801, 1222952, 1223030, 1223067, 1223068 CVE References: CVE-2021-46925, CVE-2021-46926, CVE-2021-46927, CVE-2021-46929, CVE-2021-46930, CVE-2021-46931, CVE-2021-46933, CVE-2021-46936, CVE-2021-47082, CVE-2021-47087, CVE-2021-47091, CVE-2021-47093, CVE-2021-47094, CVE-2021-47095, CVE-2021-47096, CVE-2021-47097, CVE-2021-47098, CVE-2021-47099, CVE-2021-47100, CVE-2021-47101, CVE-2021-47102, CVE-2021-47104, CVE-2021-47105, CVE-2021-47107, CVE-2021-47108, CVE-2021-47181, CVE-2021-47182, CVE-2021-47183, CVE-2021-47185, CVE-2021-47189, CVE-2022-4744, CVE-2022-48626, CVE-2022-48629, CVE-2022-48630, CVE-2023-0160, CVE-2023-28746, CVE-2023-35827, CVE-2023-4881, CVE-2023-52447, CVE-2023-52450, CVE-2023-52453, CVE-2023-52454, CVE-2023-52469, CVE-2023-52470, CVE-2023-52474, CVE-2023-52476, CVE-2023-52477, CVE-2023-52481, CVE-2023-52484, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2023-52488, CVE-2023-52492, CVE-2023-52493, CVE-2023-52494, CVE-2023-52497, CVE-2023-52500, CVE-2023-52501, CVE-2023-52502, CVE-2023-52503, CVE-2023-52504, CVE-2023-52507, CVE-2023-52508, CVE-2023-52509, CVE-2023-52510, CVE-2023-52511, CVE-2023-52513, CVE-2023-52515, CVE-2023-52517, CVE-2023-52518, CVE-2023-52519, CVE-2023-52520, CVE-2023-52523, CVE-2023-52524, CVE-2023-52525, CVE-2023-52528, CVE-2023-52529, CVE-2023-52532, CVE-2023-52561, CVE-2023-52563, CVE-2023-52564, CVE-2023-52566, CVE-2023-52567, CVE-2023-52569, CVE-2023-52574, CVE-2023-52575, CVE-2023-52576, CVE-2023-52582, CVE-2023-52583, CVE-2023-52587, CVE-2023-52591, CVE-2023-52594, CVE-2023-52595, CVE-2023-52597, CVE-2023-52598, CVE-2023-52599, CVE-2023-52600, CVE-2023-52601, CVE-2023-52602, CVE-2023-52603, CVE-2023-52604, CVE-2023-52605, CVE-2023-52606, CVE-2023-52607, CVE-2023-52608, CVE-2023-52612, CVE-2023-52615, CVE-2023-52617, CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52621, CVE-2023-52623, CVE-2023-52627, CVE-2023-52628, CVE-2023-52632, CVE-2023-52636, CVE-2023-52637, CVE-2023-52639, CVE-2023-6356, CVE-2023-6535, CVE-2023-6536, CVE-2023-7042, CVE-2023-7192, CVE-2024-0841, CVE-2024-2201, CVE-2024-22099, CVE-2024-23307, CVE-2024-23850, CVE-2024-25739, CVE-2024-25742, CVE-2024-26599, CVE-2024-26600, CVE-2024-26602, CVE-2024-26612, CVE-2024-26614, CVE-2024-26620, CVE-2024-26627, CVE-2024-26629, CVE-2024-26642, CVE-2024-26645, CVE-2024-26646, CVE-2024-26651, CVE-2024-26654, CVE-2024-26659, CVE-2024-26660, CVE-2024-26664, CVE-2024-26667, CVE-2024-26670, CVE-2024-26680, CVE-2024-26681, CVE-2024-26684, CVE-2024-26685, CVE-2024-26689, CVE-2024-26695, CVE-2024-26696, CVE-2024-26697, CVE-2024-26704, CVE-2024-26717, CVE-2024-26718, CVE-2024-26722, CVE-2024-26727, CVE-2024-26733, CVE-2024-26736, CVE-2024-26737, CVE-2024-26743, CVE-2024-26744, CVE-2024-26745, CVE-2024-26747, CVE-2024-26749, CVE-2024-26751, CVE-2024-26754, CVE-2024-26760, CVE-2024-26763, CVE-2024-26766, CVE-2024-26769, CVE-2024-26771, CVE-2024-26776, CVE-2024-26779, CVE-2024-26787, CVE-2024-26790, CVE-2024-26793, CVE-2024-26798, CVE-2024-26805, CVE-2024-26807, CVE-2024-26848 Jira References: PED-5759, PED-7167, PED-7619 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:33538](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/33538/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207948] Lenovo T14s Gen3 AMD resume from hibernation ends in kernel panic
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207948 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207948#c95 --- Comment #95 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2024:1490-1: An update that solves 183 vulnerabilities, contains three features and has 38 security fixes can now be installed. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1177529, 1192145, 1194869, 1200465, 1205316, 1207948, 1209635, 1209657, 1212514, 1213456, 1214852, 1215221, 1215322, 1217339, 1217829, 1217959, 1217987, 1217988, 1217989, 1218321, 1218336, 1218479, 1218643, 1218777, 1219126, 1219169, 1219170, 1219264, 1219834, 1220114, 1220176, 1220237, 1220251, 1220320, 1220337, 1220340, 1220365, 1220366, 1220398, 1220411, 1220413, 1220439, 1220443, 1220445, 1220466, 1220478, 1220482, 1220484, 1220486, 1220487, 1220492, 1220703, 1220775, 1220790, 1220797, 1220831, 1220833, 1220836, 1220839, 1220840, 1220843, 1220870, 1220871, 1220872, 1220878, 1220879, 1220883, 1220885, 1220887, 1220898, 1220901, 1220915, 1220918, 1220920, 1220921, 1220926, 1220927, 1220929, 1220932, 1220935, 1220937, 1220938, 1220940, 1220954, 1220955, 1220959, 1220960, 1220961, 1220965, 1220969, 1220978, 1220979, 1220981, 1220982, 1220983, 1220985, 1220986, 1220987, 1220989, 1220990, 1221009, 1221012, 1221015, 1221022, 1221039, 1221040, 1221044, 1221045, 1221046, 1221048, 1221055, 1221056, 1221058, 1221060, 1221061, 1221062, 1221066, 1221067, 1221068, 1221069, 1221070, 1221071, 1221077, 1221082, 1221090, 1221097, 1221156, 1221162, 1221252, 1221273, 1221274, 1221276, 1221277, 1221291, 1221293, 1221298, 1221337, 1221338, 1221375, 1221379, 1221551, 1221553, 1221613, 1221614, 1221616, 1221618, 1221631, 1221633, 1221713, 1221725, 1221777, 1221791, 1221814, 1221816, 1221830, 1221951, 1222011, 1222033, 1222051, 1222056, 1222060, 1222070, 1222073, 1222117, 1222247, 1222266, 1222274, 1222291, 1222300, 1222304, 1222317, 1222331, 1222355, 1222356, 1222360, 1222366, 1222373, 1222416, 1222422, 1222427, 1222428, 1222431, 1222437, 1222445, 1222449, 1222503, 1222520, 1222536, 1222549, 1222550, 1222557, 1222585, 1222586, 1222596, 1222609, 1222610, 1222619, 1222630, 1222632, 1222660, 1222662, 1222664, 1222669, 1222677, 1222678, 1222680, 1222706, 1222720, 1222724, 1222726, 1222727, 1222764, 1222772, 1222781, 1222784, 1222798, 1222801, 1222952, 1223030, 1223067, 1223068 CVE References: CVE-2021-46925, CVE-2021-46926, CVE-2021-46927, CVE-2021-46929, CVE-2021-46930, CVE-2021-46931, CVE-2021-46933, CVE-2021-46936, CVE-2021-47082, CVE-2021-47087, CVE-2021-47091, CVE-2021-47093, CVE-2021-47094, CVE-2021-47095, CVE-2021-47096, CVE-2021-47097, CVE-2021-47098, CVE-2021-47099, CVE-2021-47100, CVE-2021-47101, CVE-2021-47102, CVE-2021-47104, CVE-2021-47105, CVE-2021-47107, CVE-2021-47108, CVE-2021-47181, CVE-2021-47182, CVE-2021-47183, CVE-2021-47185, CVE-2021-47189, CVE-2022-4744, CVE-2022-48626, CVE-2022-48629, CVE-2022-48630, CVE-2023-0160, CVE-2023-28746, CVE-2023-35827, CVE-2023-4881, CVE-2023-52447, CVE-2023-52450, CVE-2023-52453, CVE-2023-52454, CVE-2023-52469, CVE-2023-52470, CVE-2023-52474, CVE-2023-52476, CVE-2023-52477, CVE-2023-52481, CVE-2023-52484, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2023-52488, CVE-2023-52492, CVE-2023-52493, CVE-2023-52494, CVE-2023-52497, CVE-2023-52500, CVE-2023-52501, CVE-2023-52502, CVE-2023-52503, CVE-2023-52504, CVE-2023-52507, CVE-2023-52508, CVE-2023-52509, CVE-2023-52510, CVE-2023-52511, CVE-2023-52513, CVE-2023-52515, CVE-2023-52517, CVE-2023-52518, CVE-2023-52519, CVE-2023-52520, CVE-2023-52523, CVE-2023-52524, CVE-2023-52525, CVE-2023-52528, CVE-2023-52529, CVE-2023-52532, CVE-2023-52561, CVE-2023-52563, CVE-2023-52564, CVE-2023-52566, CVE-2023-52567, CVE-2023-52569, CVE-2023-52574, CVE-2023-52575, CVE-2023-52576, CVE-2023-52582, CVE-2023-52583, CVE-2023-52587, CVE-2023-52591, CVE-2023-52594, CVE-2023-52595, CVE-2023-52597, CVE-2023-52598, CVE-2023-52599, CVE-2023-52600, CVE-2023-52601, CVE-2023-52602, CVE-2023-52603, CVE-2023-52604, CVE-2023-52605, CVE-2023-52606, CVE-2023-52607, CVE-2023-52608, CVE-2023-52612, CVE-2023-52615, CVE-2023-52617, CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52621, CVE-2023-52623, CVE-2023-52627, CVE-2023-52628, CVE-2023-52632, CVE-2023-52636, CVE-2023-52637, CVE-2023-52639, CVE-2023-6356, CVE-2023-6535, CVE-2023-6536, CVE-2023-7042, CVE-2023-7192, CVE-2024-0841, CVE-2024-2201, CVE-2024-22099, CVE-2024-23307, CVE-2024-23850, CVE-2024-25739, CVE-2024-25742, CVE-2024-26599, CVE-2024-26600, CVE-2024-26602, CVE-2024-26612, CVE-2024-26614, CVE-2024-26620, CVE-2024-26627, CVE-2024-26629, CVE-2024-26642, CVE-2024-26645, CVE-2024-26646, CVE-2024-26651, CVE-2024-26654, CVE-2024-26659, CVE-2024-26660, CVE-2024-26664, CVE-2024-26667, CVE-2024-26670, CVE-2024-26680, CVE-2024-26681, CVE-2024-26684, CVE-2024-26685, CVE-2024-26689, CVE-2024-26695, CVE-2024-26696, CVE-2024-26697, CVE-2024-26704, CVE-2024-26717, CVE-2024-26718, CVE-2024-26722, CVE-2024-26727, CVE-2024-26733, CVE-2024-26736, CVE-2024-26737, CVE-2024-26743, CVE-2024-26744, CVE-2024-26745, CVE-2024-26747, CVE-2024-26749, CVE-2024-26751, CVE-2024-26754, CVE-2024-26760, CVE-2024-26763, CVE-2024-26766, CVE-2024-26769, CVE-2024-26771, CVE-2024-26776, CVE-2024-26779, CVE-2024-26787, CVE-2024-26790, CVE-2024-26793, CVE-2024-26798, CVE-2024-26805, CVE-2024-26807, CVE-2024-26848 Jira References: PED-5759, PED-7167, PED-7619 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:33538](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/33538/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 (src): kernel-source-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1, kernel-syms-azure-5.14.21-150500.33.48.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198817] Firefox 99 and Thunderbird 91 unusable (extremly slow) without a IPv6 network
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198817 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198817#c8 Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NORESPONSE CC| |Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de --- Comment #8 from Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> --- Upstream bug closed due to insufficient information. It has been two years, let’s assume this is either gone or no longer relevant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1213574] New: Thunderbird OAUTH2 broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213574 Bug ID: 1213574 Summary: Thunderbird OAUTH2 broken Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Leap 15.4 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox Assignee: factory-mozilla(a)lists.opensuse.org Reporter: aaron.w2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Recent Thunderbird updates broke OAUTH2 and this seems to be a common problem with Thunderbird 102. With this update it no longer presents an OAUTH2 dialog for IMAP. My employer uses Microsoft Office365 and OAUTH2 is essential. This used to work. Even with a clean install and nuking the previous configuration it will never prompt for OAUTH2 authentication like it used to. Note that the OAUTH2 dialog DOES work with SMTP, but not IMAP. Searching the Internet reveals that this is a common problem with this release. Please upgrade Thunderbird to a newer release for 15.4. I'm not quite ready to upgrade to 15.5 just yet since I use this machine for heavy development work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1221883] Dependency resolution failure during update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221883 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221883#c7 Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Flags|needinfo?(jechojekov@gmail. | |com) | Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de --- Comment #7 from Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> --- closing as this was resolved by user action -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217704] ovmf: reproducible builds problem in ovmf-riscv64-code.bin
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 May '24

03 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217704 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217704#c13 Joey Lee <jlee(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo? | --- Comment #13 from Joey Lee <jlee(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Joey Lee from comment #11) > (In reply to Bernhard Wiedemann from comment #10) > > OBS already sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for Leap/SLE-15 and later to the last > > date in .changes, so do not need to do anything in the .spec. > > Thanks! I have sent change to openSUSE:Factory/ovmf. The ovmf-EmbeddedPkg-Library-Support-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-in-Vir.patch be merged to factory. I am still waiting upstream for reviewing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1215663] # CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP is not set causes Fossilize INFO: Autogroup scheduling is not enabled on this kernel. Will rely entirely on nice().
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215663 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215663#c5 Michal Koutný <mkoutny(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkoutny(a)suse.com, | |vvedomil(a)protonmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(vvedomil@protonma | |il.com) --- Comment #5 from Michal Koutný <mkoutny(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Vědomil Vildomec from comment #0) > Could I ask to change that? Change config, build a kernel with > CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP=y, and make the OpenSUSE kernel and the whole distro > more friendly to gaming through Steam. I'd suggest digging deeper for possible causes of the issue. Can you quantify the friendliness in comparison with basic enablement of CPU controller? [1] Or roughly describe what's the expected behavior? Would autogroup be needed nowadays at all? SCHED_AUTOGROUP was poorly justified feature (already in 2010) that can be realized purely in userspace by creating respective groups manually (or implicitly e.g. via PAM as would happen with pam_systemd when CPU controller is enabled). Don't let me start on combination of autogroups and regular groups (consider containers) in one system. I admit, I'm not a fan of enabling this config today. [1] E.g. override /usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/20-defaults-SUSE.conf with > cat >/etc/systemd/system/user@.service.d/60-cpu-delegation.conf <<EOD > [Service] > Delegate=cpu > EOD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1211012] helix editor not properly packaged?
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211012 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211012#c6 --- Comment #6 from Soc Virnyl Estela <uncomfy+openbuildservice(a)uncomfyhalomacro.pl> --- i was expecting the latest fix was merged. is there a reason why it got revoked? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223618] New: Retroarch missing fonts and icons
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223618 Bug ID: 1223618 Summary: Retroarch missing fonts and icons Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: frtherien(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 874612 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=874612&action=edit Screenshot I've just installed Retroarch on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, a mostly fresh install of the OS. Text appears in a pixel-type font, and all icons are replaced by a black box. It seems like it is missing assets, or a similar issue. I have attached a screenshot. Here is the output from starting `retroarch --verbose`: [INFO] [Config]: Looking for config in: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg". [INFO] === Build ======================================= [INFO] CPU Model Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz [INFO] Capabilities: MMX MMXEXT SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 SSE42 AES AVX AVX2 [INFO] Version: 1.18.0 [INFO] Built: Mar 23 2024 [INFO] ================================================= [INFO] [Input]: Found input driver: "x". [INFO] [Environ]: SET_PIXEL_FORMAT: RGB565. [INFO] [Core]: Version of libretro API: 1, Compiled against API: 1 [INFO] [Core]: Geometry: 320x240, Aspect: 1.333, FPS: 60.00, Sample rate: 48000.00 Hz. [INFO] [Audio]: Set audio input rate to: 48000.00 Hz. [INFO] [Video]: Set video size to: 960x720. [ERROR] [Wayland]: Failed to connect to Wayland server. [INFO] [GLX]: GLX_EXT_swap_control_tear supported. [INFO] [GL]: Found GL context: "x". [INFO] [GL]: Detecting screen resolution: 1920x1080. [INFO] [GLX]: X = 0, Y = 0, W = 960, H = 720. [INFO] [GLX]: Found swap function: glXSwapIntervalEXT. [INFO] [GL]: Vendor: Intel, Renderer: Mesa Intel(R) HD Graphics 4400 (HSW GT2). [INFO] [GL]: Version: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 24.0.5. [INFO] [GL]: Using resolution 960x720. [INFO] [GL]: Default shader backend found: glsl. [INFO] [Shader driver]: Using GLSL shader backend. [INFO] [GLSL]: Checking GLSL shader support ... [WARN] [GL]: Stock GLSL shaders will be used. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL vertex shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL fragment shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Linking GLSL program. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL vertex shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL fragment shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Linking GLSL program. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL vertex shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Found GLSL fragment shader. [INFO] [GLSL]: Linking GLSL program. [INFO] [GL]: Using 4 textures. [INFO] [GL]: Loaded 1 program(s). [INFO] [GL]: Using GL_RGB565 for texture uploads. [INFO] [Joypad]: Found joypad driver: "udev". [INFO] [DBus]: Suspended screensaver via DBus. [INFO] [Video]: Found display server: "x11". [INFO] [PulseAudio]: Requested 24576 bytes buffer, got 18432. [INFO] [Audio]: Started synchronous audio driver. [INFO] [ALSA] Using ALSA version 1.2.11 [INFO] [Microphone]: Initialized microphone driver. [INFO] [Display]: Found display driver: "gl". [INFO] [Playlist]: Loading history file: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/content_history.lpl". [INFO] [Playlist]: Loading history file: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/content_music_history.lpl". [INFO] [Playlist]: Loading history file: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/content_video_history.lpl". [INFO] [Playlist]: Loading history file: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/content_image_history.lpl". [INFO] [Playlist]: Loading favorites file: "/home/francis/.config/retroarch/content_favorites.lpl". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1223773] zypper does not accept option: break <package> by ignoring some of its dependencies
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223773 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223773#c1 Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gcomes.obs(a)gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(gcomes.obs@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #1 from Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> --- @Giacomo, please create a solver testcase: > zypper in --debug-solver musescore Then pack the testcase directory together with the /var/log/zypper.log and attach it to the bugreport: > cd /tmp > tar cvjf zypper-testcase.bz2 /var/log/zypper.solverTestCase /var/log/zypper.log In case the testcase exceeds the 10MB limit for bugzilla uploads, you can use 'split' to divide the file into smaller pieces: > cd /tmp > split -b 10M --additional-suffix=-zypper-testcase.bz2 zypper-testcase.bz2 The created pieces will be named: xaa-zypper-testcase.bz2 xab-zypper-testcase.bz2 xac-... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1220821] Cannot install musescore in 15.6 alpha
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220821 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220821#c15 Cor Blom <cornelis(a)solcon.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #15 from Cor Blom <cornelis(a)solcon.nl> --- The change is accepted in Leap 15.6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223793] VUL-0: CVE-2023-46565: TRACKERBUG: gobgp: buffer overflow via handlingError() function in pkg/server/fsm.go
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223793 Camila Camargo de Matos <camila.matos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1223795 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207155] Missing dependency for perl-Spreadsheet-ReadSXC
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207155 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207155#c6 Bob Rogers <rogers-suse(a)rgrjr.dyndns.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(rogers-suse@rgrjr | |.dyndns.org) | --- Comment #6 from Bob Rogers <rogers-suse(a)rgrjr.dyndns.org> --- From: bugzilla_noreply(a)suse.com Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 13:48:07 +0000 Wolfgang Engel <wolfgang.engel(a)suse.com> has asked Bob Rogers <rogers-suse(a)rgrjr.dyndns.org> for needinfo: Bug 1207155: Missing dependency for perl-Spreadsheet-ReadSXC https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207155 --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Engel <wolfgang.engel(a)suse.com> --- Hello Bob, I'm sorry. This bug went out of my focus :( Happens to me all the time. ;-} It looks like that Spreadsheet::ParseODS was introduced in a later version which is included in SP5 but not SP4. Are you meanwhile on SP5 and might give it a try ? Things seem to be OK here now. After a few momemts of confusion, I've discovered that installing Spreadsheet::ReadSXC 0.37 in 15.5 now brings Spreadsheet::ParseODS 0.37 along with it: rogers@orion> fgrep PRETTY /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Leap 15.5" rogers@orion> perl -e 'use Spreadsheet::ReadSXC;' rogers@orion> rpm -q perl-Spreadsheet-ReadSXC perl-Spreadsheet-ReadSXC-0.37-bp155.1.4.noarch rogers@orion> rpm -q perl-Spreadsheet-ParseODS package perl-Spreadsheet-ParseODS is not installed rogers@orion> rpm -qa | fgrep ParseODS rogers@orion> find /usr/lib/perl5 -name ParseODS.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Spreadsheet/ParseODS.pm rogers@orion> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Spreadsheet/ParseODS.pm perl-Spreadsheet-ReadSXC-0.37-bp155.1.4.noarch rogers@orion> Thanks, -- Bob -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223793] VUL-0: CVE-2023-46565: TRACKERBUG: gobgp: buffer overflow via handlingError() function in pkg/server/fsm.go
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223793 Camila Camargo de Matos <camila.matos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1223794 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223793] VUL-0: CVE-2023-46565: TRACKERBUG: gobgp: buffer overflow via handlingError() function in pkg/server/fsm.go
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

1 0

[Bug 1223775] installation-images wrongly uses gettext-runtime-mini
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775#c4 --- Comment #4 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Steffen Winterfeldt from comment #2) > # du -s gettext-runtime* > 2476 gettext-runtime > 3760 gettext-runtime-mini > > But what do I know... Heh, what a luck 'mini' refers to the build deps and not the size. Still a very interesting effect -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223775] installation-images wrongly uses gettext-runtime-mini
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775#c3 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- Fixed: - https://github.com/openSUSE/installation-images/pull/709 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223775] installation-images wrongly uses gettext-runtime-mini
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775#c2 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #2 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- # du -s gettext-runtime* 2476 gettext-runtime 3760 gettext-runtime-mini But what do I know... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223775] installation-images wrongly uses gettext-runtime-mini
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223775#c1 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 874630 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=874630&action=edit Disk Usage of gettext-runtime gettext-runtime on my Leap 15.5: 2.0 MiB But most of /usr/share of that package can easily be omitted, and that would be 548 kiB less. /usr/share/locale is already 352 kiB that nobody needs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0