April 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090#c11 --- Comment #11 from Nikolay Gueorguiev <nikolay.gueorguiev(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Nikolay Gueorguiev from comment #10) > (In reply to Stefan Hundhammer from comment #9) > > Nikolay, why did you assign this to yast2-maintainers? > > > > Where exactly is YaST involved in this? > > > > That "convertfs" call is in the .spec file of that filesystem package; not > > our responsibility. > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/packages/filesystem/ > > files/filesystem.spec?expand=1 > > > > > > s390-tools is not ours: > > > > osc maintainer s390-tools > > Defined in package: Base:System/s390-tools > > bugowner of s390-tools : > > ngueorguiev > > > > maintainer of s390-tools : > > ngueorguiev > > > > Defined in project: Base:System > > bugowner of s390-tools : > > - > > > > maintainer of s390-tools : > > dirkmueller, msmeissn, oertel, a_jaeger, seife, trenn, WernerFink, > > dmolkentin, group:factory-maintainers > > > > Defined in project: Base > > bugowner of s390-tools : > > - > > > > maintainer of s390-tools : > > adrianSuSE, janblunck, rguenther > > > > > > And the order of package installation is determined by libzypp, not by YaST. > > I also don't know if something like "X needs to be installed before Y" > > shouldn't be expressed as RPM dependencies. > > > > > > So, why did this get assigned back to YaST, and what is even left to do here? > > I have re-assigned it to the 'initial' group. > > If you know which group would be better, please feel free to reassign it. > > From the ticket, I don't see anything about s390-tools, except the > 'recommended' directory for the /lib/s390-tools/stage3.bin. The root cause > is something else, not that the data file is in wrong directory. 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <5> o3zvm001(3595) [zypp-core] Exception.cc(log):202 RpmDb.cc(doInstallPackage):1846 THROW: Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed: Command exited with status 1. 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <5> o3zvm001(3595) [zypp-core] Exception.cc(log):202 History: 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <5> o3zvm001(3595) [zypp-core] Exception.cc(log):202 - error: lua script failed: [string "%prein(filesystem-84.87-15.3.s390x)"]:22: exit 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <5> o3zvm001(3595) [zypp-core] Exception.cc(log):202 error: filesystem-84.87-15.3.s390x: install failed 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <5> o3zvm001(3595) [zypp-core] Exception.cc(log):202 2024-04-18 09:39:16 <1> o3zvm001(3595) [Ruby] modules/PackageCallbacks.rb(DonePackage):506 DonePackage(error: 3, reason: 'Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed: Command exited with status 1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090#c10 Nikolay Gueorguiev <nikolay.gueorguiev(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nikolay.gueorguie | |v(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #10 from Nikolay Gueorguiev <nikolay.gueorguiev(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Hundhammer from comment #9) > Nikolay, why did you assign this to yast2-maintainers? > > Where exactly is YaST involved in this? > > That "convertfs" call is in the .spec file of that filesystem package; not > our responsibility. > > https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/packages/filesystem/ > files/filesystem.spec?expand=1 > > > s390-tools is not ours: > > osc maintainer s390-tools > Defined in package: Base:System/s390-tools > bugowner of s390-tools : > ngueorguiev > > maintainer of s390-tools : > ngueorguiev > > Defined in project: Base:System > bugowner of s390-tools : > - > > maintainer of s390-tools : > dirkmueller, msmeissn, oertel, a_jaeger, seife, trenn, WernerFink, > dmolkentin, group:factory-maintainers > > Defined in project: Base > bugowner of s390-tools : > - > > maintainer of s390-tools : > adrianSuSE, janblunck, rguenther > > > And the order of package installation is determined by libzypp, not by YaST. > I also don't know if something like "X needs to be installed before Y" > shouldn't be expressed as RPM dependencies. > > > So, why did this get assigned back to YaST, and what is even left to do here? I have re-assigned it to the 'initial' group. If you know which group would be better, please feel free to reassign it. From the ticket, I don't see anything about s390-tools, except the 'recommended' directory for the /lib/s390-tools/stage3.bin. The root cause is something else, not that the data file is in wrong directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ma(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nikolay.gueorguie | |v(a)suse.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090#c9 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Comment #9 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- Nikolay, why did you assign this to yast2-maintainers? Where exactly is YaST involved in this? That "convertfs" call is in the .spec file of that filesystem package; not our responsibility. https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/packages/filesystem/fi… s390-tools is not ours: osc maintainer s390-tools Defined in package: Base:System/s390-tools bugowner of s390-tools : ngueorguiev maintainer of s390-tools : ngueorguiev Defined in project: Base:System bugowner of s390-tools : - maintainer of s390-tools : dirkmueller, msmeissn, oertel, a_jaeger, seife, trenn, WernerFink, dmolkentin, group:factory-maintainers Defined in project: Base bugowner of s390-tools : - maintainer of s390-tools : adrianSuSE, janblunck, rguenther And the order of package installation is determined by libzypp, not by YaST. I also don't know if something like "X needs to be installed before Y" shouldn't be expressed as RPM dependencies. So, why did this get assigned back to YaST, and what is even left to do here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1220821] Cannot install musescore in 15.6 alpha
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220821 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220821#c11 Giacomo Comes <gcomes.obs(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |gcomes.obs(a)gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Giacomo Comes <gcomes.obs(a)gmail.com> --- I'm reopening this bug report because the problem still exists. Background: Do a fresh leap 15.6 beta installation. Choose the plasma or gnome role. Complete the installation and then run: zypper in musescore, result: Problem: the to be installed musescore-4.2.1-bp156.1.2.x86_64 requires '(pipewire-alsa if pipewire)', but this requirement cannot be provided not installable providers: pipewire-alsa-1.0.4-150600.1.6.x86_64[disk_v_oss] pipewire-alsa-1.0.4-150600.2.pm.29.x86_64[packman_disk_Essentials] Solution 1: Following actions will be done: deinstallation of pipewire-1.0.4-150600.1.6.x86_64 deinstallation of pipewire-lang-1.0.4-150600.1.6.noarch deinstallation of plasma5-session-wayland-5.27.11-bp156.1.4.x86_64 deinstallation of wireplumber-0.5.1-150600.1.1.x86_64 deinstallation of wireplumber-lang-0.5.1-150600.1.1.noarch Solution 2: Following actions will be done: deinstallation of alsa-plugins-pulse-1.2.7.1-150500.1.1.x86_64 deinstallation of pulseaudio-17.0-150600.2.2.x86_64 deinstallation of pulseaudio-lang-17.0-150600.2.2.noarch deinstallation of pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-17.0-150600.2.2.x86_64 deinstallation of pulseaudio-module-gsettings-17.0-150600.2.2.x86_64 deinstallation of pulseaudio-module-x11-17.0-150600.2.2.x86_64 deinstallation of pulseaudio-module-zeroconf-17.0-150600.2.2.x86_64 Solution 3: do not install musescore-4.2.1-bp156.1.2.x86_64 Solution 4: break musescore-4.2.1-bp156.1.2.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies The musescore specfile contains: Requires: ( alsa-plugins-pulse if pulseaudio ) Requires: ( pipewire-alsa if pipewire ) So if pulseaudio is installed, install alsa-plugins-pulse if pipewire is installed, install pipewire-alsa It is assumed that both pulseaudio and pipewire are not installed at the same time otherwise both alsa-plugins-pulse and pipewire-alsa would be installed which is not possible because they conflict with each other. That's exactly what is happening with the fresh installation: You got installed pulseaudio, alsa-plugins-pulse and pipewire. musescore then wants to install pipewire-alsa causing the resolution dilemma. In tumbleweed this does not happens because after a fresh installation you have: pipewire and pipewire-alsa installed but not pulseaudio. The problem with leap 15.6 seems to be that you end up with both pulseaudio and pipewire installed. Is that configuration allowed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223090] [Build 20240417] openQA test fails in await_install: Installation of package filesystem failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223090 Nikolay Gueorguiev <nikolay.gueorguiev(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nikolay.gueorguiev(a)suse.com |yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223393] New: Some Qt apps do not show window under gnome wayland
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223393 Bug ID: 1223393 Summary: Some Qt apps do not show window under gnome wayland Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: cornelis(a)solcon.nl QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- In a mail to lyx-devel it was reported that lyx does not start under GNOME Wayland. It does under X. I have tested sigil and kdenlive, which give the same behaviour. They seem to start, but do not show a window. They work correctly under kde plasma. To reroduce: 1. Login on gnome wayland 2. Start lyx, sigil, kdenlive from gui. 3. ResultL nothing visible happens. In overview the apps are visible, but without window. For me, running lyx from commandline (console) does work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1223389] New: second monitor will go back to sleep
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223389 Bug ID: 1223389 Summary: second monitor will go back to sleep Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Applications Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: devguy.ca(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- When I lock my system and keep it running and then turn off both monitors using their power button, then later login. My second monitor will wake up for a little while and then go back to sleep or display a complete black screed, after I turned both monitors on with their power button. Dragging the mouse into the the 2nd monitor doesn't wake it up. I need to turn the monitor off and then back on. Following this, keep the mouse cursor in the same monitor and move it around for several seconds for it not go back to sleep when mouse focus is in the other monitor. The 2nd monitor model: HP L2445m $ uname -a Linux source 6.8.7-1-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Apr 18 07:12:38 UTC 2024 (5c0cf23) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Operating System: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240423 KDE Plasma Version: 6.0.4 KDE Frameworks Version: 6.1.0 Qt Version: 6.7.0 Kernel Version: 6.8.7-1-default (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 24 × AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor Memory: 62.7 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080/PCIe/SSE2 Manufacturer: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Product Name: MS-7A38 System Version: 8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1223377] Hugin fails to build against boost 1.85
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223377 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223377#c4 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ana.guerrero@suse | |.com) | --- Comment #4 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Something was telling me I had forgot something. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1170139 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0