April 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1221356] UEFI Installation Parameter ifcfg/netsetup with static ip ignored for network interface
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221356 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(snwint(a)suse.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221356] UEFI Installation Parameter ifcfg/netsetup with static ip ignored for network interface
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221356 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221356#c3 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |snwint(a)suse.com --- Comment #3 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- AFAICS for a static (non-DHCP) IP setup you need 'ifcfg' in this form: ifcfg=$IF_NAME=hostip,gateway,nameserver,domain See also https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Linuxrc#Using_ifcfg You specified only two IPs, i.e. only the host-ip and the gateway, but no nameserver and no domain. I am not sure if that is sufficient. @snwint? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221840] podman with pasta (passt) fails with apparmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840#c20 --- Comment #20 from Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Danish Prakash from comment #19) > Created attachment 874005 [details] > updated comments > > Updated the patch with the right comments, do you plan to include this > upstream? Thanks, it looks good to me, but I haven't looked yet into how to possibly restricting the 'ptrace' rule as suggested by Christian in comment #18. I can probably manage to look into it later today if you don't. Once that's solved, yes, I would apply this upstream. Just to confirm: you're testing with this patch on top of mine from comment #12, correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212806] Default route is missing when gateway has a host route
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212806 Pavel Dostál <pdostal(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pdostal(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221361] /etc/profile.d/alljava.csh sets JAVA_HOME incorrectly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361#c5 --- Comment #5 from Peter Keller <pkeller(a)globalphasing.com> --- Tom Christiansen's classic document "Csh Programming Considered Harmful" explains that this cannot be done in Csh at all. You need to invoke the Bourne Shell something like: set ALTERNATIVES_JAVAC_LINK=`/bin/sh -c 'realpath /etc/alternatives/javac 2>/dev/null'` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221361] /etc/profile.d/alljava.csh sets JAVA_HOME incorrectly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361#c4 Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(werner(a)suse.com) --- Comment #4 from Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> --- Werner: any good hint how to do the stderr redir for this case we tried so solve bug#1218232 with the lines: -+if ( -l /etc/alternatives/javac ) then -+ set ALTERNATIVES_JAVAC_LINK=`realpath /etc/alternatives/javac` ++if ( -l /etc/alternatives/javac && -e /etc/alternatives/javac ) then ++ set ALTERNATIVES_JAVAC_LINK=`realpath /etc/alternatives/javac 2> /dev/null` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221840] podman with pasta (passt) fails with apparmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840#c19 Danish Prakash <danish.prakash(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #873985|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #19 from Danish Prakash <danish.prakash(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 874005 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=874005&action=edit updated comments Updated the patch with the right comments, do you plan to include this upstream? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221361] /etc/profile.d/alljava.csh sets JAVA_HOME incorrectly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361#c3 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> --- well, the typo with JAVA_HOME is pretty obvious. the question is how to handle stderr output from realpath then, redirecting stderr was added due to bug#1218232 if 15.6 did not have that then this is a build based on an older snapshot of updates and the next milestone will have that same change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221361] /etc/profile.d/alljava.csh sets JAVA_HOME incorrectly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221361 Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fstrba(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222098] tpm resource manager - tpm2_save-context failed with error 0x0901
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222098 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222098#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com, | |william.brown(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(william.brown@sus | |e.com) --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to William Brown from comment #0) > dmesg shows: > > // [ 200.968893] tpm tpm0: tpm2_save_context: failed with a TPM error 0x0901 > // [ 200.972263] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (459) occurred flushing context > // [ 200.974210] tpm tpm0: tpm2_commit_space: error -14 > > This is discussed in the tpm2 tools project here: > > https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/issues/2279 > > The summary is that the in kernel resource managers context gap max is too > low. > > This should be increased to prevent resource exhaustion. It is actually > possible to trigger this even if you are correctly flushing session contexts > after use. The above looks like a pretty old issue (around 2020). That said, no changes done in kernel side? Or do you suggest something we need to change in config or such? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0