April 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1220818] ImageMagick and ImageMagick-config-7-SUSE file conflict
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220818 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220818#c25 --- Comment #25 from Martin Wilck <martin.wilck(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Michael Andres from comment #24) > Ok, %pre is fine as well - as long as the disk is fixed before the package > is unpacked. This is what prevents any cpio issues. > > A file conflict in the rpmdb due to different content in different packages > can not be fixed by any script anyway. I don't understand. What do you mean with "the disk is fixed"? With the traditional one-transaction-per-package approach, zypper can apparently overcome the file conflict with the %pre script. Or are you saying that there is no such file conflict? What options do we have to fix issues like this such that they work with ZYPP_SINGLE_RPMTRANS=1, too? I suggest that we add OpenQA tests for updates with ZYPP_SINGLE_RPMTRANS=1. Otherwise we'll never be able to eliminate this kind of issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1212475] go1.21 release tracking
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212475 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212475#c79 --- Comment #79 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1212475) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1164437 Factory / go1.21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222257] New: Spectacle window is no longer hidden during recording
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222257 Bug ID: 1222257 Summary: Spectacle window is no longer hidden during recording Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Applications Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: oliver(a)schwabedissen.name QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Since the update to Plasma6, the Spectacle window is no longer hidden during a recording. This means that the Spectacle window is always visible during a full-screen recording. When recording a rectangle, Spectacle must always be moved out of the area to be recorded. I'm still on X11 and using an AMD graphics card with amdgpu driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1219522] Kernel panic with 6.7.x version
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219522 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219522#c39 --- Comment #39 from Edwin KM <e.kleinmentink(a)zonnet.nl> --- not sure how to modify the osc command to retrieve the file :( Next command downloads newer files: osc getbinaries Kernel:stable/kernel-source:kernel-default/standard/x86_64 Assume it does match the site: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Kernel:stable/kernel-source But this is also unknown to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221840] podman with pasta (passt) fails with apparmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840#c24 --- Comment #24 from Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Christian Boltz from comment #23) > (In reply to Stefano Brivio from comment #22) > > By the way, pasta(1) doesn't ptrace() anything and isn't ptrace()d by > > anybody, it just needs to open namespace entries in procfs. > > Namespaces can be interesting[tm], and IIRC yo don't need to do explicit > ptrace() calls to trigger ptrace events. (I'll need to ask someone who does > the kernel-side work if you are interested in the details.) Ah, don't worry, it actually makes sense, and it turns out I didn't hit this on Debian simply because I didn't check that AppArmor profile together with Buildah. > That said - the only ptrace event in your audit.log is: > > type=AVC msg=audit(04/02/2024 12:49:39.412:101237) : apparmor=DENIED > operation=ptrace profile=passt pid=8042 comm=passt.avx2 requested_mask=read > denied_mask=read peer="unconfined" > > which translates to > > ptrace read peer=unconfined, > > If passt also needs to open namespace entries of confined processes, remove > the "peer=unconfined" part. Thanks, added read ('r' for consistency with the rest of the file), but I didn't specify anything about the peer, because we don't actually know. Posting patchset upstream in a bit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218523] libreoffice: drop libqxp dependency
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218523 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218523#c3 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar(a)opensuse.org --- Comment #3 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- depends on is the wrong direction You wanted osc whatdepenson -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207881] Obsolete and incorrect manual page details for autofs(8)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207881 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207881#c5 Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn(a)suse.com> --- Closing as FIXED 15.6/TW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1206688] chmod reports false success on vfat
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206688 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206688#c6 Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn(a)suse.com> --- Closing as WONTFIX as per c#5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218523] libreoffice: drop libqxp dependency
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218523 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218523#c2 --- Comment #2 from Martin Schreiner <martin.schreiner(a)suse.com> --- Hi Bob, Looks like a lot of packages depend on libqxp. Check this command and its output. osc dependson openSUSE:Factory libqxp standard x86_64 libqxp: audit binutils boost-defaults boost:base bzip2 compat-usrmerge cpio cppunit debugedit doxygen dpkg:update-alternatives dwz elfutils fdupes file findutils gawk gcc gcc13 gcc14 gdbm gettext-runtime:gettext-runtime-mini glibc gmp gzip help2man icu isl libcap-ng libdb-4_8 libeconf librevenge libseccomp libxcrypt linux-glibc-devel make mpc mpfr ncurses patch perl perl-gettext permissions pkgconf rpm system-user-root systemd-rpm-macros timezone util-linux which xz So we won't be able to easily remove libqxp from openSUSE:Factory altogether. As a side note, I wasn't able to fully remove/disable libqxp from LibreOffice. I can replace it with an external dependency, so we don't depend on the RPM package. But the dependency is still there. Any thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217613] Leap 15.6 not reviving from suspend on '12 MacPro w/nvidia card
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Apr '24

03 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217613 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217613#c34 --- Comment #34 from Fritz Hudnut <non.space.1(a)gmail.com> --- I'd have to say, "No" . . . sometimes I think of that, but today, did not. I just used it to shut down. After I posted this I did manage to open that "nvidia-default.conf" file, and in it were two words, "blacklist nouveau" . . . . Couldn't get that file to delete or move, jammed for time, so I didn't try to edit those two words out of the file . . . . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0