April 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1190766] python-rich backports requirement
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190766 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190766#c4 Wolfgang Engel <wolfgang.engel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(hui.zhi.zhao@suse | |.com) Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Engel <wolfgang.engel(a)suse.com> --- For SLE-15-SP6 there are two packages available: python3-CommonMark (comes from Package Hub Subpackages, for python 3.6) python311-CommonMark (comes from SLE-Module-Python3, for python 3.11) Will this work for you ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221183] Upgrade problems with clang-cpp
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221183 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221183#c13 --- Comment #13 from Franz Sirl <franz.sirl-obs(a)lauterbach.com> --- (In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #9) > The earlier SPs had updates for the metapackage, but there is some reason > specific to how SLE is built that made it uncompelling to update it for > later SPs. Richard wrote somewhere that he would like to remove it if > possible. Well, that's a bit unfortunate for non-SUSE OBS users like me building newer/extended versions of SLE packages. If they build against for example SUSE:SLE-15-SP5:GA/standard , they need something like below in the spec-file: %if 0%{?is_opensuse} # openSUSE can use the meta package requirement BuildRequires: llvm-clang-devel >= 9.0.1 %else # for SLE currently we have to specify the exact package BuildRequires: clang9-devel %endif If they build against openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/standard, they stumble over the SUSE_Backports_policy-SLE_conflict blocker that cannot be turned off globally (AFAIK) in the project config. To highlight the problem, for example I would like to enable libclang support for doxygen by default via a pull request (https://build.opensuse.org/repositories/home:fsirl:doxygen-libclang) but I don't want to put that maintenance burden vs SLE on the devel:tools maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1220041] New: Update to Bugzilla Harmony.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220041 Bug ID: 1220041 Summary: Update to Bugzilla Harmony. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Bugzilla Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: rokejulianlockhart+1674683091(a)outlook.com QA Contact: bugzilla-admins(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- As https://github.com/bugzilla/harmony?tab=readme-ov-file#demo demonstrates, it's a significant improvement in every manner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1222159] AUDIT-0: gnome-remote-desktop: Polkit and D-Bus review for Gnome 46.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222159 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222159#c3 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- *** Bug 1219093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222159] AUDIT-0: gnome-remote-desktop: Polkit and D-Bus review for Gnome 46.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222159 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|security-team(a)suse.de |matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1221840] podman with pasta (passt) fails with apparmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840#c33 --- Comment #33 from Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Danish Prakash from comment #32) > (In reply to Stefano Brivio from comment #31) > > (In reply to Eyad Issa from comment #30) > > > (In reply to Stefano Brivio from comment #28) > > > > Did you also replace soft links with hard links (see comment #6)? If you > > > > don't, the AppArmor profile for pasta won't be loaded. On openSUSE > > > > Tumbleweed for x86_64, as root (or with sudo), you can do: > > > > > > Shouldn't we change the .spec file? Because installing the new version from > > > develop [1] still gives the same issue. > > > > Uh, yes, I thought that was the plan, see comment #21. needinfo'ing here and > > there, maybe Dan or Dario missed this? > > Yeah, we missed it. I'm sending an SR as we speak, thanks for the heads up! Thanks. I just had a look at https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1166199 -- I think you also need something like: install -m 0644 usr.bin.pasta %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/apparmor.d/ around line 108? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222465] Install failure after parted crash
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222465 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222465#c3 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de |aschnell(a)suse.com --- Comment #3 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- Ah, Arvin, you seem to be the one taking care of parted. Reassigning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1222465] Install failure after parted crash
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222465 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aschnell(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1027519] Xen: Missing upstream bug fixes
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027519 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027519#c233 --- Comment #233 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2024:1102-1: An update that solves three vulnerabilities and has one security fix can now be installed. Category: security (moderate) Bug References: 1027519, 1219885, 1221332, 1221334 CVE References: CVE-2023-28746, CVE-2023-46841, CVE-2024-2193 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:33142](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/33142/) Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.5 (src): xen-4.17.3_08-150500.3.27.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 (src): xen-4.17.3_08-150500.3.27.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP5 (src): xen-4.17.3_08-150500.3.27.1 Server Applications Module 15-SP5 (src): xen-4.17.3_08-150500.3.27.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218424] go1.22 release tracking
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218424 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218424#c17 --- Comment #17 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2024:1160-1: An update that solves one vulnerability and has one security fix can now be installed. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1218424, 1221400 CVE References: CVE-2023-45288 Maintenance Incident: [SUSE:Maintenance:33200](https://smelt.suse.de/incident/33200/) Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 (src): go1.22-1.22.2-1.6.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0