October 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1231052] Nvidia driver versions mismatch
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231052 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)suse.de |gfx-bugs(a)suse.de QA Contact|qa-bugs(a)suse.de |sndirsch(a)suse.com CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com Component|Kernel:Drivers |X11 3rd Party Driver -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231130] panic on boot with QEMU/KVM+UEFI for current openSUSE-Leap-15.6-NET-x86_64-Build710.3-Media.iso
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231130 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231130#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- It couldn't load / expand the initrd: [ 2.284739][ T27] Initramfs unpacking failed: write error It's hard to say what went wrong without knowing the details of your system and how it's invoked. Does VM have sufficient memory? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231056] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl error messages piling on system journal
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231056 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231056#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(robertosalomon@gm | |ail.com) CC| |robertosalomon(a)gmail.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you give the full dmesg output? The repeated messages are likely harmless, as it's a result of deferred loading and multiple retries. But it's certainly not ideal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1230673] perl: y2038: 32-bit builds use 4-byte time_t
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230673 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230673#c7 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schröder <mls(a)suse.com> --- Let's go with 64bit time_t in Factory. I'll do a submit request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231068] New: modprobe v4l2loopback: key rejected by service / opensuse i6.4.0-150600.23.22-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231068 Bug ID: 1231068 Summary: modprobe v4l2loopback: key rejected by service / opensuse i6.4.0-150600.23.22-default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: obs(a)akr.yagii.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Actual behaviour: # uname -a Linux xxx 6.4.0-150600.23.22-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 13 10:42:50 UTC 2024 (5c05eeb) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # rpm -q v4l2loopback-kmp-default v4l2loopback-kmp-default-0.13.1_k6.4.0_150600.21-lp156.1.8.x86_64 u # find /lib/modules/ -name 'v4l*.ko' /lib/modules/6.4.0-150600.23.17-default/weak-updates/updates/v4l2loopback.ko /lib/modules/6.4.0-150600.21-default/updates/v4l2loopback.ko /lib/modules/6.4.0-150600.23.22-default/weak-updates/updates/v4l2loopback.ko # modprobe v4l2loopback modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'v4l2loopback': Key was rejected by service Expected behaviour: - module loads w/o issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1227328] New: toolbox image is based on SLEM 5.4
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227328 Bug ID: 1227328 Summary: toolbox image is based on SLEM 5.4 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Containers Assignee: containers-bugowner(a)suse.de Reporter: felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- On Leap 15.6 the toolbox package pulls the now EOL toolbox image from Leap-Micro 5.4. > leap15-6:~ # toolbox > Trying to pull registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/leap-micro/5.4/toolbox:latest... I think it should at least use 5.5, better Leap-Micro 6.0 nowadays. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1231067] X11:Drivers:Video:Redesign/nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed: Bug - driver does not function after kernel 6.10
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231067#c13 --- Comment #13 from pallas wept <pallaswept(a)proton.me> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #12) > when testing to see what is really set as driver options. I checked the journal to confirm the command line, it really was set as described. Everyone else who has the failure sees the same result, too, so I'm confident in those observations. It's pretty weird. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231067] X11:Drivers:Video:Redesign/nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed: Bug - driver does not function after kernel 6.10
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231067#c12 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> --- This is getting more and more confusing. Maybe you should redo all the tests and run cat /proc/cmdline when testing to see what is really set as driver options. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231175] New: [Build 20240930] openQA test fails in add_box_virtualbox: vagrant does not support virutalbox 7.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231175 Bug ID: 1231175 Summary: [Build 20240930] openQA test fails in add_box_virtualbox: vagrant does not support virutalbox 7.1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4525032/modules/add_ box_virtualbox/steps/41 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Virtualization:Other Assignee: virt-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation INFO interface: error: The provider 'virtualbox' that was requested to back the machine 'default' is reporting that it isn't usable on this system. The reason is shown below: Vagrant has detected that you have a version of VirtualBox installed that is not supported by this version of Vagrant. Please install one of the supported versions listed below to use Vagrant: 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, 7.0 A Vagrant update may also be available that adds support for the version you specified. Please check www.vagrantup.com/downloads.html to download the latest version. openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_vagrant@64bit fails in [add_box_virtualbox](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4525032/modules/add_b… ## Test suite description Maintainer: dancermak. Test vagrant, vagrant plugins and the vagrant boxes ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20240814](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4403837) ## Expected result Last good: [20240813](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4402156) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1231176] New: segmentation fault in trace-cmd
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Oct '24

01 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231176 Bug ID: 1231176 Summary: segmentation fault in trace-cmd Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Slowroll Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: andrea.manzini(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- package version: # rpm -qai trace-cmd Name : trace-cmd Version : 3.2 Release : 2.1 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Mon Sep 30 17:36:48 2024 Group : Development/Tools/Debuggers Size : 1271417 License : GPL-2.0-only Signature : RSA/SHA512, Sat May 11 19:29:12 2024, Key ID 35a2f86e29b700a4 Source RPM : trace-cmd-3.2-2.1.src.rpm Build Date : Fri May 10 11:19:23 2024 Build Host : reproducible Packager : https://bugs.opensuse.org Vendor : openSUSE URL : https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/trace-cmd/trace-cmd.git Summary : Configuration tool for Ftrace Description : trace-cmd is a command-line tool for configuring Ftrace. Distribution: openSUSE Tumbleweed to reproduce the issue, trace functions from PID 1 (systemd) : # zypper in trace-cmd # trace-cmd start -p function -P 1 plugin 'function' *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated Aborted (core dumped) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0