January 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1218328] Fedora:Rawhide has broken repository setup due to zlib-ng migration
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218328 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218328#c2 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Schröter <adrian.schroeter(a)suse.com> --- I added a De-Prefer to the compat package now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204315] [RPi] Kernel 6.0 - [drm] *ERROR* could not acquire memory range
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204315 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204315#c42 Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkubecek(a)suse.com --- Comment #42 from Michal Kubeček <mkubecek(a)suse.com> --- Heads up: IIUC mainline commit 3310288f6135 ("of/platform: Disable sysfb if a simple-framebuffer node is found") should be a slightly improved version of Thomas' patch so that I'm going to drop patches.suse/0001-bsc-1204315-Disable-sysfb-before-creating-simple-fra.patch in master branch with today's update 6.8-rc1. If I'm wrong, please reintroduce an updated version of the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219026] VUL-0: CVE-2023-42465: sudo: row hammer attacks hardening
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219026 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219026#c1 Thomas Leroy <thomas.leroy(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.leroy(a)suse.com Assignee|security-team(a)suse.de |otto.hollmann(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Thomas Leroy <thomas.leroy(a)suse.com> --- Thanks for the report Andreas. Affected: - SUSE:SLE-11-SP3:Update - SUSE:SLE-12-SP2:Update - SUSE:SLE-12-SP3:Update - SUSE:SLE-12-SP5:Update - SUSE:SLE-15-SP3:Update - SUSE:SLE-15-SP4:Update - SUSE:SLE-15-SP5:Update - SUSE:SLE-15:Update -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219026] VUL-0: CVE-2023-42465: sudo: row hammer attacks hardening
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219026 SMASH SMASH <smash_bz(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |CVSSv3.1:SUSE:CVE-2023-4246 | |5:7.0:(AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/ | |S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218620] cmake: -Wl,--no-undefined breaks canokey-qemu build
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218620 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218620#c10 --- Comment #10 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> --- I don't mind having this enabled. As packager with only most basic cmake knowledge it hit me out of the blue. I'd really appreciate an announcement and some docu what do to do in case of trouble. Something like eg. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO In the end we need canokey-qemu fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219034] devel:languages:nodejs prjconf disables _lto_cflags
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219034 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219034#c1 Adam Majer <amajer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Adam Majer <amajer(a)suse.com> --- I've removed the macros from prjconf. Thanks for report! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1196265] User accounts are created with the former usergroup model
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196265 Paul Graff <pj.opensuse(a)gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pj.opensuse(a)gmx.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218864] grub2: error messages: 'not a correct XFS inode' shown many many times
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218864 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218864#c27 Michael Chang <mchang(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ailiopoulos@suse. | |com) --- Comment #27 from Michael Chang <mchang(a)suse.com> --- .. and that seem to conflict with this block of comment ... /* * The expected number of directory entries is only tracked for the * single extent case. */ if (dir->inode.nextents == grub_cpu_to_be32_compile_time (1)) { /* Check if last direntry in this block is reached. */ entries--; if (!entries) break; } Hi Anthony: I apologize for my limited understanding of the XFS layout, which hinders my ability to delve deeper into the issue. The regression seems to be linked to the entry number check, where a recent commit has eliminated cases other than that of a single extent. I would greatly appreciate it if you could assess whether this change is sound and valid. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218864] grub2: error messages: 'not a correct XFS inode' shown many many times
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218864 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218864#c26 --- Comment #26 from Michael Chang <mchang(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 872053 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=872053&action=edit check-expected-entry.diff It appears to me the error can be avoided if we check expected number of entries in the dir block regardless number of extend equals 1 or not. In other words, always do the check before iterating entries .. > entries = grub_be_to_cpu32 (tail->leaf_count) - grub_be_to_cpu32 (tail->leaf_stale); > > if (!entries) > continue; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1218948] kernel:[ 3380.214840][ C0] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 112s! [kworker/0:2:156]
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218948 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218948#c24 --- Comment #24 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Thanks for confirmation! I'm building another kernel with the backports of a few rest upstream fixes for that driver. It's being built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1218948-2 repo. The package will appear later at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1218948-2/pool/ Please check it and verify whether the errors are gone with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0