April 2023 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1210148] I propose to add "zypper why" alias to search command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148#c7 Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED --- Comment #7 from Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> --- A `why` command however should be a bit more sophisticated. It should also recognize supplements (AKA reverse-recommends) and Hardware/Language settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210148] I propose to add "zypper why" alias to search command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148#c6 --- Comment #6 from Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Grzegorz Wo�� from comment #4) > Probably. I have read the manual for both commands, but it is still unclear > which one does what. Maybe this helps: Somepackage provides: wrzlprmpf Foo: requires: Somepackage Baa: requires: wrzlprmpf # zypper se --requires Somepackage Finds 'Foo' because it (literally) requires 'Somepackage'. # zypper se --requires-pkg Somepackage Finds 'Foo' and 'Baa' because both require something the 'package Somepackage' provides. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210148] I propose to add "zypper why" alias to search command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148#c5 --- Comment #5 from Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #1) > Check the underlying graphing in https://rusnak.io/zypper-dependency-graph/ I don't think '<graphic>' is supported in newer testcase formats. We could at most write out a dot-file which can be fed into some graph rendering tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210148] I propose to add "zypper why" alias to search command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148#c4 --- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Wo�� <grzegorz.w(a)trzynastkaplus.pl> --- (In reply to Michael Andres from comment #3) Probably. I have read the manual for both commands, but it is still unclear which one does what. But that might actually be language barrier. Still, this shows a use case for more intuitive alias. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210148] I propose to add "zypper why" alias to search command
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210148#c3 --- Comment #3 from Michael Andres <ma(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Grzegorz Wo�� from comment #0) > an alias to search --recommends or search --requires, similar to how > what-provides works. In fact one should use --requires-pkg (--recommends-pkg) for this question. --requires just looks packages requiring the name 'somepackage'. --requires-pkg however looks for packages requiring something 'somepackage' provides. Combined with '-s -v' you also see the matching dependency. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1206843] Lenovo T14s Gen3 AMD resume from sleep broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206843 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206843#c12 --- Comment #12 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- ... and more https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1926 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2181 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1200524] libcontainers-common: RPM installation fails unless bash is present
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200524 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200524#c17 --- Comment #17 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2023:1774-1: An update that contains two features and has seven recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1171578, 1175821, 1182998, 1197093, 1200524, 1205536, 1207509 Jira References: SLE-12122, SMO-143 Sources used: openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 openSUSE Leap 15.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 Basesystem Module 15-SP4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207509] [Build 20230124] buildah is not happy with the etc/containers/storage.conf
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207509 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207509#c4 --- Comment #4 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2023:1774-1: An update that contains two features and has seven recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1171578, 1175821, 1182998, 1197093, 1200524, 1205536, 1207509 Jira References: SLE-12122, SMO-143 Sources used: openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 openSUSE Leap 15.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 Basesystem Module 15-SP4 (src): libcontainers-common-20230214-150400.3.5.2 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1206843] Lenovo T14s Gen3 AMD resume from sleep broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206843 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206843#c11 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |patrik.jakobsson(a)suse.com --- Comment #11 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- There seems still some issue with MST. Now we received a Lenovo dock and I've tested T14s Gen 3 with the Lenovo dock. Both S3 and S4 work fine as long as no dock is connected or the dock is kept connected while suspend/resume (although we see some spurious kernel WARNING). But when a dock is connected at S3/S4 and gets removed before the resume: the machine can be resumed on the laptop screen, but the monitor on the dock can't be enabled after re-plugging the dock. (Actually, the first replug doesn't detect the monitor at all. When you replug twice, it'll probe the monitor, but the mode switching fails.) On 6.1.12 and 6.2.9 kernels, the situation is better, the monitor works again after the second replug. Patrik, on which kernel version is the DRM code of our SP5 based? I'm suspecting we're scratching the bug in the past upstream: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2171 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1161486] [y2-dhcp-server] Feature: more informative help and/or error reporting
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161486 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161486#c5 --- Comment #5 from Aaron Williams <aaron.w2(a)gmail.com> --- LDAP through YaST is still broken in OpenSUSE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0