March 2023 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1179367] New: Driver brcmfmac for Broadcom 43430 or firmware does not use channel 12 and 13 on WiFi 2.4GHz
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179367 Bug ID: 1179367 Summary: Driver brcmfmac for Broadcom 43430 or firmware does not use channel 12 and 13 on WiFi 2.4GHz Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: aarch64 OS: openSUSE Leap 15.2 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: werner(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: cfamullaconrad(a)suse.com, dleuenberger(a)suse.com, karol(a)babioch.de, mpluskal(a)suse.com Depends on: 1179308 Found By: --- Blocker: --- Meanwhile I've installed the missing package wireless-regdb and build and installed the package crda, also I'm abel to set the country code to DE and allow to use the channels 12 and 13 in the 2.4GHz area. This is reported by ``iwlist``: smartmeter:~ # iwlist wlan0 channel wlan0 13 channels in total; available frequencies : Channel 01 : 2.412 GHz Channel 02 : 2.417 GHz Channel 03 : 2.422 GHz Channel 04 : 2.427 GHz Channel 05 : 2.432 GHz Channel 06 : 2.437 GHz Channel 07 : 2.442 GHz Channel 08 : 2.447 GHz Channel 09 : 2.452 GHz Channel 10 : 2.457 GHz Channel 11 : 2.462 GHz Channel 12 : 2.467 GHz Channel 13 : 2.472 GHz Nevertheless the brcmfmac driver does not see my router on channel 13, nor channel 12 of any of my neighbours, the highest channel reported by e.g. the command ``nmcli dev wifi list`` I open this bug because there are reports that in principle the hardware Broadcom 43430 does support channels above channel 11 as seen here https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1355 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1179308 +++ this fact leads even after adding the line options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom=DE in /etc/modprobe.d/99-local.conf and reloading both cfg80211 and brcmfmac kernel modules ... in the kernel logs I see: [ 9360.888829] usbcore: deregistering interface driver brcmfmac [ 9378.151397] cfg80211: Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates for regulatory database [ 9378.152331] cfg80211: Loaded X.509 cert 'sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7' [ 9378.152533] platform regulatory.0: Direct firmware load for regulatory.db failed with error -2 [ 9378.152545] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 9382.598023] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43430-sdio for chip BCM43430/1 [ 9382.598335] usbcore: registered new interface driver brcmfmac [ 9382.725940] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43430-sdio for chip BCM43430/1 [ 9382.726020] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_process_clm_blob: no clm_blob available (err=-2), device may have limited channels available [ 9382.726514] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware: BCM43430/1 wl0: Oct 23 2017 03:55:53 version 7.45.98.38 (r674442 CY) FWID 01-e58d219f in other words theregulatory.bin is missed, compare with https://forum-raspberrypi.de/forum/thread/34332-rpi3-trotz-kernel-4-4-50-ke… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1208188] [Build 20230212] plasmashell crashes
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188#c7 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?, | |needinfo?(schwab(a)suse.de) --- Comment #7 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Andreas, due to: (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #5) > 2) it is enough to "zypper up glibc" for this to start happenning. 2.36 -> 2.37 to be more specific. Any idea why the below can happen? Quoting from https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465872#c23: (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #23) > (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #22) > > Ah, because it's not ep at that location -- 0xb706dff0 is code, not data: > > So: > ================ ExecutionEngine::setQmlEngine(this=0xb59250) sets > m_qmlEngine to 0xb7b73c > <no other setQmlEngine() here> > virtualGet that=0x9fbc0820 > eng=0xb59250 > qeng=0xb7208f08 > > I.e. ExecutionEngine is created by new(), 0xb7b73c is set as m_qmlEngine. > Nothing else sets m_qmlEngine during runtime and then it crashes. At that > point, the engine is still the one created earlier (0xb59250), but its > m_qmlEngine is suddenly 0xb7208f08 (a pointer to the code). This really > looks like a memory corruption. > > Note that when I set up a breakpoint in ExecutionEngine::setQmlEngine, the > issue doesn't occur. So it is likely racy on the top of the above. (I wanted > to add a "watch" to ExecutionEngine::m_qmlEngine there to see who overwrites > that. > > Maybe we should continue in downstream (openSUSE miscompilation) or upstream > (qt bug). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208188] [Build 20230212] plasmashell crashes
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188#c6 Dominique Leuenberger <dleuenberger(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dleuenberger(a)suse.com Flags|needinfo?(dimstar@opensuse. | |org) | --- Comment #6 from Dominique Leuenberger <dleuenberger(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #5) > Maybe a stupid question, but was the repo rebuilt after the glibc update? > > As it: > 1) crashes deeply in the qt stack due to memory corruption, and > 2) it is enough to "zypper up glibc" for this to start happenning. Yes - the entire :LegacyX86 tree has been rebuilt (not first day directly - but it did happen at least) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1201089] [META] GCC 13 package failures
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201089 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201089#c21 --- Comment #21 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- icu i586 test failures will be fixed with: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1068645 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208188] [Build 20230212] plasmashell crashes
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208188#c5 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar(a)opensuse.org, | |jslaby(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(dimstar@opensuse. | |org) --- Comment #5 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Maybe a stupid question, but was the repo rebuilt after the glibc update? As it: 1) crashes deeply in the qt stack due to memory corruption, and 2) it is enough to "zypper up glibc" for this to start happenning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208823] New: [Build 20230301] openQA test fails in fsconfig03
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208823 Bug ID: 1208823 Summary: [Build 20230301] openQA test fails in fsconfig03 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3152360/modules/fsco nfig03/steps/7 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation fsconfig03.c:62: TPASS: kernel seems to be fine on ext2 fsconfig03.c:62: TPASS: kernel seems to be fine on ext3 fsconfig03.c:62: TPASS: kernel seems to be fine on ext4 fsconfig03.c:62: TPASS: kernel seems to be fine on xfs fsconfig03.c:62: TPASS: kernel seems to be fine on btrfs fsconfig03.c:38: TBROK: fsopen() failed: ENODEV (19) Test process returned unkown none zero value (2). Test took approximately 0.251809949986637 seconds Some test output could not be parsed: 11 lines were ignored. openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-JeOS-for-kvm-and-xen-x86_64-jeos-ltp-syscalls@uefi_virtio-2G fails in [fsconfig03](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3152360/modules/fsconfig03/st… ## Test suite description ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230301](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3152041) ## Expected result Last good: [20230228](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3150859) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1208659] Dist-upgrade made taskbar/init menu disappear
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208659 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208659#c12 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM --- Comment #12 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- If the "Error: cannot change the containment to AppletsLayout" messages indicate the cause that looks like some applet is configured as containment twice somehow. I see in the config file that it's filled with some obsolete monitor configurations, but that shouldn't be a cause. I suggest you file a bug report upstream and attach the broken config there, mentioning that it worked fine with 5.26. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208826] VUL-0: CVE-2023-25222: libredwg: heap-based buffer overflow in bit_read_RC()
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208826 Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208826] New: VUL-0: CVE-2023-25222: libredwg: heap-based buffer overflow in bit_read_RC()
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208826 Bug ID: 1208826 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2023-25222: libredwg: heap-based buffer overflow in bit_read_RC() Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/358944/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: jengelh(a)inai.de Reporter: carlos.lopez(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- CVE-2023-25222 A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exits in GNU LibreDWG v0.12.5 via the bit_read_RC function at bits.c. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-25222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25222 https://github.com/LibreDWG/libredwg/issues/615 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1208791] New: [Build 20230228] yast-apparmor: seems unable to parse audit log
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '23

02 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208791 Bug ID: 1208791 Summary: [Build 20230228] yast-apparmor: seems unable to parse audit log Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3150986/modules/scan _audit_logs_ncurses/steps/25 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation The test verifies the log file before going to yast: grep 'DENIED' /var/log/audit/audit.log where we get a line back like: type=AVC msg=audit(1677666475.779:625): apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" class="cap" profile="nscd" pid=3927 comm="nscd" capability=5 capname="kill" The last passing test returned for the same query: type=AVC msg=audit(1677531073.714:615): apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" profile="nscd" pid=3947 comm="nscd" capability=5 capname="kill" (class="cap" is new - main change on the snapshot is kernel 6.2) Unfortunately, I don't have a yast log yet - will have to try to reproduce locally (but yast does not really show an error, just 'no more records in logfile to process - so the format change might be very likely to be the reason) openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-yast2_apparmor@64bit fails in [scan_audit_logs_ncurses](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3150986/modules/… ## Test suite description Maintainer: llzhao(a)suse.com ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20230228](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3150840) ## Expected result Last good: [20230227](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3148176) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1