February 2023 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1208157] Support Bluetooth devices in SDDM.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208157 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208157#c8 roke beedell <rokejulianlockhart+1674683091(a)outlook.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(rokejulianlockhar | |t+1674683091(a)outlook.com) | --- Comment #8 from roke beedell <rokejulianlockhart+1674683091(a)outlook.com> --- Created attachment 865125 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=865125&action=edit No provider of 'bluz-auto-enable-devices' found. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208589] VUL-0: chromium: multiple security issues fixed in 110.0.5481.177
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208589 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208589#c5 --- Comment #5 from Micha�� Szczepaniak <m.szczepaniak.000(a)gmail.com> --- I just update once there's update in chromium, and I notice that there's update pending -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1206115] New: GNOME:Factory/flatpak: User Level Setup per default instead of system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1206115 Bug ID: 1206115 Summary: GNOME:Factory/flatpak: User Level Setup per default instead of system Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: reiokorn(a)tutanota.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Per default Tumbleweed installs the flathub remote at a system level I suggest to change this from the system to the user level for new installations. Like Microos is already doing and Fedora and many other distros. e.g. flatpak remote-add --user --if-not-exists flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo Is there any reason why Tumbleweed sticks to system? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1208169] New: Weird ACPI error messages with Zen 4 CPU [7700x]
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208169 Bug ID: 1208169 Summary: Weird ACPI error messages with Zen 4 CPU [7700x] Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: reiokorn(a)tutanota.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 864839 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=864839&action=edit journalctl kernel I'm getting weird error messages at boot since I upgraded to a Zen 4 CPU using Tumbleweed. Sys Info: NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" # VERSION="20230210" Linux tumbleweed-pc 6.1.10-1-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 6 07:27:26 UTC 2023 (2a0570b) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This part in the sys-log Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating named object [\_SB.PCI0.GPP7._PRW], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20220331/dswload2-326) Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20220331/psobject-220) Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating named object [\_SB.PCI0.GPP2._PRW], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20220331/dswload2-326) Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20220331/psobject-220) Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating named object [\_GPE._L08], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20220331/dswload2-326) Feb 12 13:28:58 tumbleweed-pc kernel: ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20220331/psobject-220) Feb 12 13:28:59 tumbleweed-pc kernel: hub 8-0:1.0: config failed, hub doesn't have any ports! (err -19) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1207279] New: When going to suspend, system instantly wakes up again
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207279 Bug ID: 1207279 Summary: When going to suspend, system instantly wakes up again Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: ralf.kissmann(a)uibk.ac.at QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Build Identifier: Since the change from kernel 6.0 to 6.1 suspend does not work any more on my system - neither when using the Gnome desktop menu nor when closing the lid on the laptop. In this case the system seems to briefly go to suspend only to directly wake up again (the power LED briefly turns off, just to turn on again). The system still works fine, but suspend just does not work any more. On kernel 6.0 this worked without any problem. The problem was present for the first version of kernel 6.1 and is still unchanged with kernel 6.1.4 The hardware I use is a Lenovo Thinkpad T14s G2 AMD with AMD with Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U processor. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run gnome on recent AMD system 2. Suspend system Actual Results: The computer will instantly wake up again. Expected Results: System should stay in suspend and only wake up when either opening the lid or pressing the power button It seems that the bug is related to the kernel according a discussion in the Arch-Linux community, e.g., to be found here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=282293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1206421] libvulkan_intel-32bit isn't installed automatically with wine
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206421 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206421#c7 Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> --- yes, it is implemented in current factory wine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 Ismail D�nmez <ismail(a)i10z.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ismail(a)i10z.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260#c49 --- Comment #49 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- I had to supersede the SR. New one now is 1067701. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260#c48 --- Comment #48 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Br�ns from comment #47) > Yes, a dependency on both libraries, directly or indirectly, even over > multiple indirections. > > E.g. everything that embeds a python interpreter, and uses numpy, or scipy. > Other examples probably exist. Ok, I've given it a try, please check SR 1067697. As a heads up, I'm currently chasing another issue: we started to use a later C compiler to build openblas on SLE/Leap as it has more avx512 compiler intrinsics leaving the fortran compiler to be the stock version - in the hopes to retain the frotran ABI of this version. It turned out it didn't as the final link of libopenblas.so.0 is done with gcc (the newer version) - which pulled in libfortan5. So essentially, the fortran ABI is broken. So we are debating to go back to the stock compiler version - at least for x86_64. However, with the latest version update, the build with the stock gcc version (gcc7) has been broken again(*) when Intel added Cooperlake support. Of course, the side effect would be that we will lose a lot of optimization for modern Intel CPUs. (*) Intel did this before already which I had to go after as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208589] VUL-0: chromium: multiple security issues fixed in 110.0.5481.177
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Feb '23

25 Feb '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208589 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208589#c4 Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |m.szczepaniak.000(a)gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Andreas Stieger <Andreas.Stieger(a)gmx.de> --- Micha��, what's your plan for keeping network:chromium/ungoogled-chromium updated? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0