February 2023 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1207837] amdgpu: externals displays don't work when booting with plugged in docking station
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207837 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207837#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jirib79(a)gmail.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(jirib79(a)gmail.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you verify whether the issue is fixed with the latest TW kernel (6.1.9 and later)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207763] Since 5.14.21-150400.24.41-default, machine fails to recover from hibernation.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207763 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207763#c15 --- Comment #15 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Carlos Robinson from comment #6) > I did these tests: > > Feb 1 23:32 5.14.21-150400.24.33-default__after.gz > Feb 1 23:28 5.14.21-150400.24.33-default__before.gz > Feb 1 22:58 5.14.21-150400.24.38-default__after.gz > Feb 1 22:51 5.14.21-150400.24.38-default__before.gz > Feb 1 23:15 5.14.21-150400.24.41-default__after_1.gz > Feb 1 23:19 5.14.21-150400.24.41-default__after_2.gz > Feb 1 23:05 5.14.21-150400.24.41-default__before.gz > > (before hibernation, after hibernation dmesg output) > > I will attach now all of them. Hibernation worked on all those kernels. When > I installed kernel 24.41, it failed on two or three days. Now it works. > Maybe I need to use the machine for a day before it fails? > > I left the machine now running 24.41. OK, let us know if you can trigger the bug again. > Another thing that I noticed before, with kernel > 5.14.21-150400.24.38-default there is USB trouble. There is record in the > log. The keyboard was partially unresponsive. You mean the -110 error from xhci? It seems gone with *.41 kernel, good :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208003] 32-bit installation images do not support 32-bit EFI.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208003 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208003#c2 --- Comment #2 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- There is https://jira.suse.com/browse/PED-2569 or https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178340 TL;DR The easy part is making the install media boot with 32 bit EFI. But atm yast cannot create a working grub setup for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207943] btrfs i/o error on Alderlake
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207943 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207943#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kokeko(a)mac.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(kokeko(a)mac.com) --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you give more details? What packages have been updated? If it's the kernel update, booting with the previous kernel still works? If so, please give the dmesg outputs from both working and non-working cases (or at least some screenshot indicating the kernel errors). Last but not least, please give the hwinfo output, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208003] 32-bit installation images do not support 32-bit EFI.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208003 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |snwint(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1208003] 32-bit installation images do not support 32-bit EFI.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208003 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208003#c1 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rokejulianlockhart+16746830 | |91(a)outlook.com Flags| |needinfo?(rokejulianlockhar | |t+1674683091(a)outlook.com) --- Comment #1 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- Please add a real bug description. Just a hyperlink forces everybody working with the bug to read through the entire thread. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207965] [Build 20230207-1][Leap15.4 update] after upgrading the system from older leap releases, only a very small window shows up when starting 'konsole'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207965 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(richard.fan@suse. | |com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207965] [Build 20230207-1][Leap15.4 update] after upgrading the system from older leap releases, only a very small window shows up when starting 'konsole'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207965 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207965#c4 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Richard Fan from comment #3) > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #2) > > Same as bug 1189927? > > I think so, the issue can be seen after upgrading from the older leap > releases It looks like this worked in previous tests runs. Did anything change or is this a random failure? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207203] VUL-0: CVE-2023-22458: redis: Integer overflow in the Redis HRANDFIELD and ZRANDMEMBER commands can lead to denial-of-service
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207203 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207203#c9 --- Comment #9 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2023:0295-1: An update that solves two vulnerabilities and has one errata is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1207202,1207203,1207448 CVE References: CVE-2022-35977,CVE-2023-22458 JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.4 (src): redis-6.2.6-150400.3.11.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP4 (src): redis-6.2.6-150400.3.11.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1207202] VUL-0: CVE-2022-35977: redis: Integer overflow in the Redis SETRANGE and SORT/SORT_RO commands can drive Redis to OOM panic
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Feb '23

07 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207202 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207202#c11 --- Comment #11 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2023:0295-1: An update that solves two vulnerabilities and has one errata is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1207202,1207203,1207448 CVE References: CVE-2022-35977,CVE-2023-22458 JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.4 (src): redis-6.2.6-150400.3.11.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP4 (src): redis-6.2.6-150400.3.11.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0