December 2023 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1217336] aws-cli broken dependency: requires python3-docutils < 0.20
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217336 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com Assignee|public-cloud-maintainers@su |adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com |se.de | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217344] Linux 6.6.x fails to boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217344 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217344#c9 Rigo Wenning <rigo(a)w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rigo(a)w3.org --- Comment #9 from Rigo Wenning <rigo(a)w3.org> --- I have also kernel failure with the latest tumbleweed kernel. When installing it runs dracut for every single core. The system boots. But when I want to log into KDE, it hangs forever. Console reports a failure to start powerdevil (for whatever reason). So already the kernel install procedure seems fishy. Again, Kernel 6.5.9 just works fine, boots, KDE runs fine. I have a Dell latitude 7490. So even if it starts, I think kernel 6.6 has trouble interacting with KDE. There seems to be something fundamentally wrong. BTW, when installed for the first time, the system started and ran fine, even after reboot. I haven't done any install since then. Now I have updated to the latest tumbleweed 2023-12-02. That runs fine with kernel 6.5.9 but does not work with Kernel 6.6. I think this is a critical bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 966058] Offline upgrade fails (2016-02-10)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966058 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966058#c3 --- Comment #3 from Atri Bhattacharya <badshah400(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to hui from comment #2) > After 7 years this bug seems no longer reproducible... That is true, I agree completely. Been using offline upgrades for several years now with no issues. Though the mills of openSUSE grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217344] Linux 6.6.x fails to boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217344 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217344#c8 --- Comment #8 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- At first, try to check whether the latest 6.7-rc still suffers from the same problem. If it boots, it's something specific to 6.6.x, and we need to find an upstream fix. If 6.7-rc still doesn't boot, it has to be reported to the upstream. But without a proper log, it's a bit difficult to know to whom reporting. I guess you'd be asked to perform git bisect in such a case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217612] PHP 8.1 on Leap 15.5 wish list
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217612 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217612#c7 --- Comment #7 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Olav Reinert from comment #4) > I managed to get those three installed, but it turns out that Nextcloud 27 > also requires php81-pear. Can I ask you to provide that one as well, please? Yes, it is planned, too: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/pgajdos:/maintenance:/php81… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217619] grub2 reproducible builds
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217619 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217619#c2 Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS Flags|needinfo?(bwiedemann(a)suse.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> --- I tested it successfully. It produces bit-identical results now. The patches also look good to me. The only thing I wondered why the free (tfp); was not already there before. That should have leaked some (insignificant) memory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1194187] openssl broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187#c55 --- Comment #55 from Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2023:4635-1: An update that solves one vulnerability and has two security fixes can now be installed. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1194187, 1207472, 1216922 CVE References: CVE-2023-5678 Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.5 (src): openssl-3-3.0.8-150500.5.19.1 Basesystem Module 15-SP5 (src): openssl-3-3.0.8-150500.5.19.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217760] New: exfat-fuse: please consider not installing this by default in Tumbleweed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217760 Bug ID: 1217760 Summary: exfat-fuse: please consider not installing this by default in Tumbleweed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: silviucc(a)outlook.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello, For some time now the kernel has been shipping a proper driver for accessing devices formatted with exFAT that is quite faster than the fuse implementation. Please consider not installing this by default. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1213796] New: java-20-openjdk fails to compile in 2034
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213796 Bug ID: 1213796 Summary: java-20-openjdk fails to compile in 2034 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java Assignee: java-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: fstrba(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- While working on reproducible builds for openSUSE, I found that our java-20-openjdk package fails to compile in 2034 to reproduce: osc co openSUSE:Factory/java-20-openjdk && cd $_ osc build --clean --noservice -j1 --vm-type=kvm \ --build-opt=--vm-custom-opt="-rtc base=2034-02-02T00:00:00" \ standard x86_64 [ 284s] /usr/lib64/jvm/java/bin/java -XX:+UseSerialGC -Xms32M -Xmx512M -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Duser.language=en -Duser.country=US -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:-VerifySharedSpaces -XX:SharedArchiveFile=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/configure-support/classes.jsa -Xshare:auto -cp /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/buildtools/jdk_tools_classes build.tools.generatecharacter.CharacterName /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/src/java.base/share/data/unicodedata/UnicodeData.txt /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/jdk/modules/java.base/java/lang/uniName.dat [ 284s] /usr/bin/rm -f /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/jdk/modules/java.base/java/util/currency.data [ 284s] /usr/lib64/jvm/java/bin/java -XX:+UseSerialGC -Xms32M -Xmx512M -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Duser.language=en -Duser.country=US -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:-VerifySharedSpaces -XX:SharedArchiveFile=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/configure-support/classes.jsa -Xshare:auto -cp /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/buildtools/jdk_tools_classes build.tools.generatecurrencydata.GenerateCurrencyData -o /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/jdk/modules/java.base/java/util/currency.data.tmp -i /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/src/java.base/share/data/currency/CurrencyData.properties [ 285s] Error: time is more than 10 years from present: 1672527600000 [ 285s] java.lang.RuntimeException: time is more than 10 years from present: 1672527600000 [ 285s] at build.tools.generatecurrencydata.GenerateCurrencyData.makeSpecialCaseEntry(GenerateCurrencyData.java:315) [ 285s] at build.tools.generatecurrencydata.GenerateCurrencyData.buildMainAndSpecialCaseTables(GenerateCurrencyData.java:254) [ 285s] at build.tools.generatecurrencydata.GenerateCurrencyData.main(GenerateCurrencyData.java:185) [ 285s] gmake[3]: *** [Gendata.gmk:55: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk20u-jdk-20.0.1-9/build/jdk/modules/java.base/java/util/currency.data] Error 1 [ 285s] gmake[2]: *** [make/Main.gmk:147: java.base-gendata] Error 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1214800] KDE Wayland Screen Energy Saving Problem
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Dec '23

03 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214800 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214800#c3 --- Comment #3 from Cunha <pfaca(a)tutamail.com> --- Since I submitted this bug, I've moved on to EndeavourOS (Arch based), and I'm still having the same bug. That leaves me to believe that the bug is indeed related to KDE or Wayland and not SUSE. I'm waiting for the plasma 6 release, to see if something changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0