May 2022 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1198885] Uranium fails in %check on aarch64 only in Backports due to an issue with numpy and libopenblas_pthreads.so.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885#c18 --- Comment #18 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- As always, the flavor that everything else depends on is the last one to finish building. Finally, building of uranium and pfstools for aarch64 as finished successfully in home:eeich:openblasTst on OBS. Thus, with the latest change we should be good on aarch64 as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199058] taglib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath (Badness: 10000) /usr/bin/framelist /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/taglib-1.12/build/taglib
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199058 Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |davejplater(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198885] Uranium fails in %check on aarch64 only in Backports due to an issue with numpy and libopenblas_pthreads.so.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885#c17 --- Comment #17 from Axel Braun <axel.braun(a)gmx.de> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #16) > Both are using the same package version: > libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.20-150400.1.5 This i snot yet available for Leap 15.4 Beta on aarch64? just did a zypper dup and get libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.20-150400.1.2 - and it fails to call numpy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198885] Uranium fails in %check on aarch64 only in Backports due to an issue with numpy and libopenblas_pthreads.so.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885#c16 --- Comment #16 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #15) > (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #14) > > (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #13) > > > (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #11) > > > > Test build can be found here: > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:eeich:openblasTst > > > > > > You build against x86_64 which is already OK. You should try on aarch64. > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP4/urani… > > > > Why should this be any different? Makes no sense. > > The fact is it is different. And this is the purpose of this bug report. > Maybe some (re)build happened for some architectures only? Both are using the same package version: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.20-150400.1.5 > I cannot check since those packages are from IBS. I can't either. All arm machines I have access to are currently down, so an 'osc build ...' is out of the question. I've now enabled the aarch64 build in my test repo. Let's see what this gives us. As I've described in comment #8, a link from libopenblas_pthreads0.so* should be there - for some reason it isn't. This is related to update alternatives as the link isn't created when the package is installed with 'rpm -i --noscripts'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177485] New: Missing package xorg-x11 from DVD installer
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177485 Bug ID: 1177485 Summary: Missing package xorg-x11 from DVD installer Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Patterns Assignee: dimstar(a)opensuse.org Reporter: sofia.syrianidou(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 842403 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=842403&action=edit save_y2logs While trying to perform installation via vnc, without activation of online repositories, package xorg-x11 is not available. As a result, after the remote installation, xvnc is not active. Attached there is a screenshot of installation overview, displaying the error message and save_y2logs. from installation logs: YaST2/y2log:2020-10-08 08:21:18 <1> install(7008) [Pkg] Package.cc(PkgQueryProvides):132 Searching packages providing: xorg-x11 YaST2/y2log:2020-10-08 08:21:18 <3> install(7008) [Ruby] modules/Packages.rb(block in find_providers):2454 Provider not found for 'xorg-x11' after installation xorg-x11 package is not installed if online repositories are disabled. On the contrary, if online repositories are enabled, xorg-x11 is installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1198681] dracut: put initrd into correct directory according to boot loader spec
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198681 Antonio Feijoo <antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.suse.com/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=1199051 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199051] [Build 20220430] dracut - post trans failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199051 Antonio Feijoo <antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.suse.com/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=1198681 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199051] [Build 20220430] dracut - post trans failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199051 Antonio Feijoo <antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS CC| |antonio.feijoo(a)suse.com Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |dracut-maintainers(a)suse.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198885] Uranium fails in %check on aarch64 only in Backports due to an issue with numpy and libopenblas_pthreads.so.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885#c15 --- Comment #15 from Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #14) > (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #13) > > (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #11) > > > Test build can be found here: > > > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:eeich:openblasTst > > > > You build against x86_64 which is already OK. You should try on aarch64. > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP4/urani… > > Why should this be any different? Makes no sense. The fact is it is different. And this is the purpose of this bug report. Maybe some (re)build happened for some architectures only? I cannot check since those packages are from IBS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198885] Uranium fails in %check on aarch64 only in Backports due to an issue with numpy and libopenblas_pthreads.so.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198885#c14 --- Comment #14 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #13) > (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #11) > > Test build can be found here: > > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:eeich:openblasTst > > You build against x86_64 which is already OK. You should try on aarch64. > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP4/urani… Why should this be any different? Makes no sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0