April 2022 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1197628] "invalid signature tag Archivesize" (1046) appears on installing old rpm packages like jre-5u10-linux.i586
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197628 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197628#c3 Michael Schr�der <mls(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Michael Schr�der <mls(a)suse.com> --- Seems like the bad SP4 rpm package was just dropped a couple of days ago, so this should be fixed in the next build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174763] VUL-0: CVE-2020-6829,CVE-2020-12400,CVE-2020-12401,CVE-2020-12403: mozilla-nss: Update to 3.55
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174763 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174763#c4 Gabriele Sonnu <gabriele.sonnu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Gabriele Sonnu <gabriele.sonnu(a)suse.com> --- Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174763] VUL-0: CVE-2020-6829,CVE-2020-12400,CVE-2020-12401,CVE-2020-12403: mozilla-nss: Update to 3.55
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174763 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174763#c3 Gabriele Sonnu <gabriele.sonnu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gabriele.sonnu(a)suse.com Assignee|cgrobertson(a)suse.com |security-team(a)suse.de --- Comment #3 from Gabriele Sonnu <gabriele.sonnu(a)suse.com> --- All done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1197628] "invalid signature tag Archivesize" (1046) appears on installing old rpm packages like jre-5u10-linux.i586
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197628 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197628#c2 Michael Schr�der <mls(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reinhard.hennig(a)freenet.de Flags| |needinfo?(reinhard.hennig@f | |reenet.de) --- Comment #2 from Michael Schr�der <mls(a)suse.com> --- But wasn't this already fixed last year? See bug 1190824. If you do an "rpm -q --changelog rpm", do you see the following entry? Wed Dec 22 14:34:57 CET 2021 - mls(a)suse.de - Backport header check changes so that old rpms get no longer rejected [bsc#1190824] updated patch: headerchk3.diff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198120] Build Service GCC-11: Cross Toolchain for X86_64 (i586) totally useless (missing libgcc)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198120 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198120#c3 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz <matz(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Johannes Krottmayer from comment #2) > > It works, for Linux with the DEFAULT configuration with Kconfig, because in > the default config Linux implements it's own libgcc... But I can also > specify in the Kernel configuration, to use the GCC libgcc and then you get > many undefined reference linker errors, with this pseudo cross compiler. > Sorry, I'm upset because this wrong configuration. What is "wrong" is the naming of our packages: instead of "-cross-" they should have been called "-icecream-backend-" or the like, because that is what they exist(ed) for. They never were and for most architectures still aren't intended to be usable as a normal cross compiler. We're sorry for leaving the wrong impression with that package name, but it has historic roots and there isn't (or wasn't) enough incentive to change the naming. Currently we're (on and off) working on changing the whole setup of cross (or pseudo-cross) compilers. But that will still be so that only some target architectures will exist as full proper glibc-based cross compilers. The rest will remain free-standing-only or even just icecream-backend-only cross compilers. (The difference is basically that the icecream backends are never used for linking target code, and hence don't need and don't have any of the target libs, e.g. libgcc). So, to determine which targets to include in which list, what's your target? Is it really cross-compiling _to_ x86_64? As you're using Windows 10, also on x86_64, why aren't you just using the normal native compiler? > But what is with other tools? GRUB? I'm currently don't know the source > code. But when GRUB don't use it's own config, the linking also fails... Yes, linking fails. The icecream backends aren't supprting linking target code, and that it works with the kernel, in some configurations, is only a happy (but generally unsupported) accident. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1197610] [Build 20220326] accountsservice fails to start on SELinux enabled system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197610 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197610#c4 --- Comment #4 from Johannes Segitz <jsegitz(a)suse.com> --- didn't know about osc rq clone, nice. I still don't see it. I'll be on FTO next two weeks and need to finish the 15-4 audit. I'll try to find some time to dig deeper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1195023] New: AUDIT-0: budgie-control-center: polkit-untracked-privilege warnings
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195023 Bug ID: 1195023 Summary: AUDIT-0: budgie-control-center: polkit-untracked-privilege warnings Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: gmbr3(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- New budgie-control-center package requires polkit authorisation. However, the package is a fork of the GNOME Control Center (version 41.2). budgie-control-center.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) org.buddiesofbudgie.controlcenter.datetime.configure (no:no:auth_admin_keep) budgie-control-center.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) org.buddiesofbudgie.controlcenter.remote-login-helper (no:no:auth_admin_keep) budgie-control-center.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) org.buddiesofbudgie.controlcenter.user-accounts.administration (no:no:auth_admin_keep) Package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:gmbr3:Solus/budgie-control-cen… (will be moved to X11:Solus) Git repo: https://github.com/BuddiesOfBudgie/budgie-control-center -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1197968] New: systemd 250 seems to change handling of unreadable networkd
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197968 Bug ID: 1197968 Summary: systemd 250 seems to change handling of unreadable networkd Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: mrueckert(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The trigger of the bug is https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197967 But systemd 250 changed the behavior of networkd. Up to systemd 249 it just ignored unreadable files. so even if those vpn files had root:root u=rw,g=r,o= it worked just fine as the normal network files were worldreable. this is no longer the case and now it seems any unreadable file breaks the network startup in the initrd. once we are in the full system, the files on disk have the proper group again and loading of those vpn unit files works. Is this behavior change really intended? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1198148] UPDATE-TRACKER: Update firewalld to 0.9.8
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198148 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198148#c1 --- Comment #1 from Callum Farmer <gmbr3(a)opensuse.org> --- https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/967308 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198148] UPDATE-TRACKER: Update firewalld to 0.9.8
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198148 Callum Farmer <gmbr3(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrostecki(a)suse.com Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |gmbr3(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0