December 2022 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1205818] Issues with barrierc KVM client since latest libX11 update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205818 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205818#c8 Michael Pujos <pujos.michael(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pujos.michael(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Michael Pujos <pujos.michael(a)gmail.com> --- using latest libX11 v1.8.2m vkquake also has this issue, crashing between 2s and 1min after starting a map: [xcb] Unknown sequence number while processing queue [xcb] You called XInitThreads, this is not your fault [xcb] Aborting, sorry about that. vkquake: xcb_io.c:278: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed. Aborted (core dumped) The coredump: Stack trace of thread 5797: #0 0x00007f01a545a7ec __pthread_kill_implementation (libc.so.6 + 0x907ec) #1 0x00007f01a5407816 raise (libc.so.6 + 0x3d816) #2 0x00007f01a53f081c abort (libc.so.6 + 0x2681c) #3 0x00007f01a53f072b __assert_fail_base.cold (libc.so.6 + 0x2672b) #4 0x00007f01a53ffc46 __assert_fail (libc.so.6 + 0x35c46) #5 0x00007f019ead7784 n/a (libX11.so.6 + 0x45784) #6 0x00007f019ead7846 n/a (libX11.so.6 + 0x45846) #7 0x00007f019eadb2aa _XEventsQueued (libX11.so.6 + 0x492aa) #8 0x00007f019eab7ee7 XCheckIfEvent (libX11.so.6 + 0x25ee7) #9 0x00007f01a56c28b5 n/a (libSDL2-2.0.so.0 + 0xfd8b5) #10 0x00007f01a5612e99 n/a (libSDL2-2.0.so.0 + 0x4de99) #11 0x00007f01a5613287 n/a (libSDL2-2.0.so.0 + 0x4e287) #12 0x0000562798b69538 n/a (vkquake + 0x8f538) Is that a bug in libSDL2 xcb use that is now caught in libX11, or is it a bug in libX11 xcb ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205785] microos_getting_started page is not displaying any sensible content
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205785 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205785#c2 Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |tbazant(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM --- Comment #2 from Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> --- created corresponding issue https://github.com/openSUSE/openSUSE-docs-revamped-temp/issues/94 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205104] New: No longer any SMB1 support
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205104 Bug ID: 1205104 Summary: No longer any SMB1 support Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Samba Assignee: samba-maintainers(a)SuSE.de Reporter: bgthoreson(a)gmail.com QA Contact: samba-maintainers(a)SuSE.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Samba on Tumbleweed is now compiled not allowing SMB1 support. I understand the security reasons why this is a good thing, but now there is no solution for users who still need this support. Could there be an added option to allow SMB1 legacy support by installing a specific Samba package that allowed it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1205951] New: The upgrade from 15.3 to 14 updated leafnode from 1 to 2, which are not compatible
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205951 Bug ID: 1205951 Summary: The upgrade from 15.3 to 14 updated leafnode from 1 to 2, which are not compatible Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Upgrade Problems Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: carlos.e.r(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- The upgrade from 15.3 to 15.4 upgraded my existing leafnode 1.11.11-bp153.1.18 to leafnode 2.0.0+git.1527241185.66da754-bp154.1.26. The two versions are not compatible, migration is impossible and the new version simply will never work, without intensive adjustment by the operator. The configuration file is totally different, and the message store is also different (it has to be downloaded again). This operation resets the reading marks in the clients. It is havoc. Not even a warning about this in the release notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1205561] [doc] 41.4 Installing an SELinux policy
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205561 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205561#c1 Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED Assignee|fs(a)suse.com |taroth(a)suse.com Whiteboard| |https://jira.suse.com/brows | |e/DOCTEAM-844 --- Comment #1 from Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> --- Thank you for reporting this bug! It is being tracked and processed as part of our queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1195435] Braille translation mismatches with 'liblouis'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195435 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar(a)opensuse.org Assignee|gnome-bugs(a)suse.de |mgorse(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204018] Virtualization:vagrant/vagrant-libvirt: Bug vagrant up fail with public_network
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204018 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204018#c1 Dan ��erm��k <dcermak(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thieryy(a)ovh.fr Flags| |needinfo?(thieryy(a)ovh.fr) --- Comment #1 from Dan ��erm��k <dcermak(a)suse.com> --- The package has been updated to 0.10.8 in Factory about two weeks ago and 0.11.1 is on its way in. Could you check if either version resolves the issue for you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205585] [Build 20221110] Broken font rendering in installations over VNC
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205585 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205585#c24 --- Comment #24 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #23) > My guess is that with Xvnc there's a different selection of X11 visuals > available and the installer selects one which does not quite work with the > font rendering method. It might be missing alpha for instance or somehow > blend it incorrectly. Correct. Xvnc is started with -depth 16, so the default visual is RGB565. I can reproduce the issue locally by running "kate -stylesheet /usr/share/YaST2/theme/current/wizard/installation.qss" connected to Xvnc -depth 16. It works with a 32bit visual, e.g. -visual 0x400. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 699999] [12.3] gdm: investigate what is needed to use --enable-split-authentication
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699999 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699999#c7 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com --- Comment #7 from Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> --- Hi, I just added fingerprint and smartcard pam config for gdm, and enabled split authentication. I guess now split authentication is default in gdm because I searched the code, there is no place that really checks this option. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1039542 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205664] Lack of gdm-fingerprint PAM file.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205664 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205664#c2 --- Comment #2 from Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> --- https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1039542 For GNOME:Factory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0