November 2022 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1198120] Build Service GCC-11: Cross Toolchain for X86_64 (i586) totally useless (missing libgcc)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198120 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198120#c8 --- Comment #8 from Michael Matz <matz(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Kai Liu from comment #6) > (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #5) > > That's correct. The transition to proper cross compilers on aarch64 only > > happened starting with gcc9. But you might want to use gcc11 as the most > > current released one. > > It seems cross-aarch64-gcc11 is still missing libgcc. Any idea why? Are you checking on SLES15? That's using the old icecream-backend-only setup, we didn't port the real cross compilers to SLES, as that doesn't have a cross glibc either. You should use openSUSE for any cross development. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204315] [RPi] Kernel 6.0 - [drm] *ERROR* could not acquire memory range
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204315 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204315#c24 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann(a)suse.com> --- Hi (In reply to Andreas F�rber from comment #23) > (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #22) > > The kernel should avoid setting such a known bad config combo, or at least, > > it should give more useful information at runtime if the known bad kconfig > > combo must be still applicable. > > Wouldn't the best solution be to implement efifb as drm driver? > I assume it uses runtime callback hooks beyond just accessing the memory > area like simpledrm does. I considered the idea of implementing some sort of 'efidrm'. It's not really the fix here, but would make the whole situation less confusing. > > Also, I would ask to avoid upstream fixes as depending on "ARM" just because > we happened to encounter it there - please make it !X86 or whatever > applicable. RISC-V, C-Sky or MIPS may well run into similar > simple-framebuffer issues. The term *ERROR* in the bug report is somewhat misleading. There's nothing broken here, there's no loss of functionality. It's a minor problem with how we deal with the framebuffer resource. Is is possible that the ARM EFI stubs create the EFI framebuffer from some other source than the DT's simple-framebuffer node? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202924] VUL-1: kvm_stat: parses /proc/mounts possibly in an unsafe way
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202924 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|SUSE Security Internal, | |novellonly | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204786] Boot is hanging when intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM [8086:15f2] is enabled
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204786 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204786#c6 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(bechir.kahla@suse | |.com) --- Comment #6 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you check whether it's a regression in the update kernel? That is, install the old Leap 15.4 GA kernel and confirm the behavior. Also, please check with the latest kernel in OBS Kernel:SLE15-SP4 repo, too. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/SLE15-SP4/pool/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204929] dracut-pre-udev complains about missing group rpc:rpc
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204929 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204929#c8 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- /usr/sbin/sysusers2shadow is a very simplistic script. At some point, it checks if "groupadd" is available with "busybox addgroup" as a fallback. If neither is available, it will report ERROR: neither groupadd nor busybox found! and exit with 1. If that happens in a pre-install script, will it be noticed? Or will it be drowned in a ton of other messages? Is it plausible that this happens during image creation, and for that reason the group could not be created? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204952] System crashes when booting first time after kernel update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204952 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204952#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Well, this doesn't mean that it's a kernel bug at all... Such a reboot could be triggered by other means, too. If you have an evidence of a kernel crash, or better the stack trace of a crash, we can go further for analysis. But without that info, it's basically no way to diagnose, unfortunately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1203655] Libroffice 7.4 app windows don't open after starting them the first time (on KDE).
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203655 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203655#c2 --- Comment #2 from Danilo Spinella <danilo.spinella(a)suse.com> --- Hi and thank you for the report! A new version of libreoffice has just been released. Can you please try again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1203085] New: multipathd: checker thread may block uevent handling with huge number of paths
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203085 Bug ID: 1203085 Summary: multipathd: checker thread may block uevent handling with huge number of paths Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: martin.wilck(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fixed in latest multipath-tools upstream. Upstream fix description: # allowing path checking to be interrupted. When there are a huge number of paths (> 10000) The about of time that the checkerloop can hold the vecs lock for while checking the paths can get to be large enough that it starves other vecs lock users. If path checking takes long enough, it's possible that uxlsnr threads will never run. To deal with this, this patchset makes it possible to drop the vecs lock while checking the paths, and then reacquire it and continue with the next path to check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1204739] [Staging] gpgme 1.18.0 breaks libreoffice build
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204739 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204739#c6 Danilo Spinella <danilo.spinella(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Danilo Spinella <danilo.spinella(a)suse.com> --- LO now builds with gpgme-1.18.0. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204762] glibc error "Cannot stat: No such file or directory" during build of git
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204762 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204762#c8 Danilo Spinella <danilo.spinella(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED Assignee|danilo.spinella(a)suse.com |mls(a)suse.com --- Comment #8 from Danilo Spinella <danilo.spinella(a)suse.com> --- The builds are not failing anymore due to the error in the description. However, this issue is still there, so I guess it would be worth investigating. Assigning the bug to Michael for further investigation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0