November 2022 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1183345] sudo not using /usr/etc/nsswitch.conf
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183345 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183345#c2 Jason Sikes <jsikes(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Jason Sikes <jsikes(a)suse.com> --- This appears to have been fixed by a sudo update. Closing as "works for me". If this is still an issue, please reopen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204987] New: Build cycle detected: HepMC, Rivet, pythia
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204987 Bug ID: 1204987 Summary: Build cycle detected: HepMC, Rivet, pythia Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- A build cycle was detected in openSUSE:Factory: * HepMC, Rivet, pythia Cycles are a critical problem, as there is no 'entry point' to start building those packages. If they don't exist yet, they can't be built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1205043] Installation of libpoppler-devel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043#c3 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- BTW your dependency problems list already contains one possible route to go: Downgrade all those libboost packages from the newer version 75_0 (which does not come with Leap 15.4) to version 66_0 (which is the Leap 15.4 default). But probably you installed that newer libboost for a reason. Now you have to make a decision WHAT you want to break: That other project that you installed libboost 75_0 for, or all those Leap 15.4 packages. I found it a lot less headaches to keep the working machine (my desktop) and my development system (where I build software) apart. If you don't, sooner or later you will break compatibility between them, and you end up with a half-broken system. That used to be the inevitable fate of a software developer, but in this day and age, virtual machines or containers (docker etc.) come to the rescue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205043] Installation of libpoppler-devel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043#c2 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- When I mark libpoppler-devel for installation in YaST sw_single on my Leap 15.4, I only get libpoppler-devel-22.01-0-150400.1.5 marked for installation, nothing else. But I already have a dozen or so libboost*66_0-devel packages installed. You OTOH seem to have a lot of libboost*75_0 packages installed. Where do those come from? I don't even see any of them in any repo that I have active on my system. I would hazard a guess that the error that you get here is a bit misleading: libpoppler-devel seems to require libboost in EXACTLY version 66_0, and your version 75_0 may not fulfill the requirements. But I may be wrong here. But one way or the other, you will probably have to find out where that libboost 75_0 comes from. I guess you have another repo active that provides it in that newer version. Maybe that repo also gives you libpoppler in a version that was built with that newer libboost. If you mixed FACTORY / TW repos with Leap 15.4 repos, this may have started a vicious cycle of incompatible versions. In that case, Tumbleweed might be a better choice; or developing in a virtual machine (libvirt / QEMU; or VirtualBox). Once you start breaking library version dependencies, things start to go downhill. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205043] Installation of libpoppler-devel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205043#c1 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Installation |Other Assignee|yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de |screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de QA Contact|jsrain(a)suse.com |qa-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #1 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- This is not a problem of the installer. The installer isn't even involved here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1205031] VUL-0: CVE-2022-41639,CVE-2022-41988: OpenImageIO: TIFF: buffer overflow when processing corrupted CMYK files
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205031 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205031#c4 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Jansen <hp.jansen(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Carlos L�pez from comment #3) > (In reply to Hans-Peter Jansen from comment #2) > > Hi Carlos, > > > > since you created all these bugs against OpenImageIO today, I've started > > updating OpenImageIO to 2.4.5.0 in my home project, and will commit > > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1033496 > > upon successful tests. > > > > Is there any (newer) issue dangling after this update? > > Thanks! I don't think so, that would be all of them. Just a heads up: the new OIIO build requires an OSL update in order to not fail with some obscure build failure there: [ 95s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/build/src/testshade/testshade_llvm_compiled_rs.bc.cpp:34437:6: error: expected primary-expression at end of input [ 95s] 34437 | 0x73, [ 95s] | ^ [ 95s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/build/src/testshade/testshade_llvm_compiled_rs.bc.cpp:34437:6: error: expected '}' at end of input [ 95s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/build/src/testshade/testshade_llvm_compiled_rs.bc.cpp:2:52: note: to match this '{' [ 95s] 2 | unsigned char testshade_llvm_compiled_rs_block[] = { [ 95s] | ^ [ 95s] make[2]: *** [src/testshade/CMakeFiles/testshade.dir/build.make:255: src/testshade/CMakeFiles/testshade.dir/testshade_llvm_compiled_rs.bc.cpp.o] Error 1 [ 95s] make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/build' [ 95s] make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... I prepared: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1033529 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1033582 now, but since OBS is under fire, it will take some time to succeed the build in my home project to be able to do proper testing. Will check for it tomorrow, and if all went well, commit the SRs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204180] [15.4][autoyast][installation] test fails in installation for transactional server role with error msg "install(4119) [Ruby] modules/Kdump.rb(update_initrd_with):421 Error updating initrd"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204180 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204180#c11 --- Comment #11 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> --- OK, reproduced and find one culprit: kdumptool does not exist. So looks like wrong dependencies. I will try to fix profile. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1204115] When user is asked for password openvpn connection fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204115 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204115#c1 Luciano Santos <luc14n0(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luc14n0(a)opensuse.org Component|GNOME |Network Assignee|gnome-bugs(a)suse.de |screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #1 from Luciano Santos <luc14n0(a)opensuse.org> --- Resorting Component from GNOME to: > Network -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199151] New: Problem with Lua Busted
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199151 Bug ID: 1199151 Summary: Problem with Lua Busted Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: mvetter(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- $: zypper in lua53-busted $: busted /usr/bin/lua: /usr/bin/busted:3: module 'busted.runner' not found: no field package.preload['busted.runner'] no file '/usr/share/lua/5.4/busted/runner.lua' no file '/usr/share/lua/5.4/busted/runner/init.lua' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/busted/runner.lua' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/busted/runner/init.lua' no file './busted/runner.lua' no file './busted/runner/init.lua' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/busted/runner.so' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/loadall.so' no file './busted/runner.so' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/busted.so' no file '/usr/lib64/lua/5.4/loadall.so' no file './busted.so' stack traceback: [C]: in function 'require' /usr/bin/busted:3: in main chunk [C]: in ? Encountered when updating rehex to version 0.5.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1199151] Problem with Lua Busted
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199151 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199151#c4 --- Comment #4 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1199151) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1033527 Factory / rehex -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0