openSUSE Bugs August 2021

bugs@lists.opensuse.org

1 participants
2818 discussions

[Bug 1185647] New: GNOME Software not updating RPM packages

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185647 Bug ID: 1185647 Summary: GNOME Software not updating RPM packages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: MicroOS Assignee: kubic-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dfaggioli(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- So, with Snapshot 20210427, pkcon now works for installing packages, e.g., from a terminal (although, it does follow weak dependencies, but that's another issue). However, updating via GNOME Software does not work yet. So, this is the situation right after install: dario@localhost:~> sudo snapper list # | Type | Pre # | Date | User | Used Space | Cleanup | Description | Userdata ---+--------+-------+---------------------------------+------+------------+---------+-----------------------+-------------- 0 | single | | | root | | | current | 1* | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:17:32 AM UTC | root | 43.02 MiB | | first root filesystem | 2 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:24:05 AM UTC | root | 36.47 MiB | number | after installation | important=yes In GNOME Software, I see the notification of some updates, I can go to the proper tab, click 'Download' and then click 'Restart & Install'. At which point, on the GUI, I see this error message: "Unable to install updates: GDBus.Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._pk_2dengine_2derror-2dquark.Code1:Failed to create symlink: Read-only file system" If I go ahead, after the reboot, the updates have not been installed. This is the status of system snapshots: dario@localhost:~> sudo snapper list [sudo] password for root: # | Type | Pre # | Date | User | Used Space | Cleanup | Description | Userdata ---+--------+-------+---------------------------------+------+------------+---------+-----------------------+------------------------------------- 0 | single | | | root | | | current | 1* | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:17:32 AM UTC | root | 144.00 KiB | | first root filesystem | 2 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:24:05 AM UTC | root | 36.47 MiB | number | after installation | important=yes 3 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 10:51:00 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes 4 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 10:55:47 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes 5 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 11:06:10 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes 6 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 11:06:48 AM UTC | root | 160.00 KiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes In journalctl, I see a bunch of lines like these: May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-.snapshots.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-boot-writable.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-root.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-sys-kernel-config.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-sys-kernel-tracing.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: \x2esnapshots-6-snapshot-sys.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-proc.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-dev.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-kernel-config.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-kernel-tracing.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-kernel-debug.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-fs-selinux.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-fs-bpf.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-fs-pstore.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-fs-cgroup.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-kernel-security.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy-sys.mount: Succeeded. May 05 11:07:19 localhost.localdomain systemd[1706]: tmp-transactional\x2dupdate\x2djNF9Qy.mount: Succeeded. PackageKit logs does not seem to me to contain anything related to this operation, but I'm happy to provide further info. After a few seconds, `snapper list` is slightly different (probably due to the fact that, right after boot, packagekit was scanning for updates): dario@localhost:~> sudo snapper list # | Type | Pre # | Date | User | Used Space | Cleanup | Description | Userdata ---+--------+-------+---------------------------------+------+------------+---------+-----------------------+------------------------------------- 0 | single | | | root | | | current | 1* | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:17:32 AM UTC | root | 19.72 MiB | | first root filesystem | 2 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 07:24:05 AM UTC | root | 36.47 MiB | number | after installation | important=yes 3 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 10:51:00 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes 4 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 10:55:47 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes 5 | single | | Wed 05 May 2021 11:06:10 AM UTC | root | 19.75 MiB | | Snapshot Update of #1 | transactional-update-in-progress=yes Of course, the expected results would be that packages are actually updated/installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 1 day

[Bug 1181533] New: Is not possible to set date with UTC format and 2038 year using hwclock

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181533 Bug ID: 1181533 Summary: Is not possible to set date with UTC format and 2038 year using hwclock Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: ionut_n2001(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi SUSE Team, I try to set date with UTC format and 2038 Year. This is not working. Steps for reproduce: # date -s "Jan 20 15:42:59 UTC 2038" # hwclock -w # hwclock -s hwclock: settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 1 day

[Bug 1176233] New: Unable to install nvidia driver 450.66

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176233 Bug ID: 1176233 Summary: Unable to install nvidia driver 450.66 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: juergen-fuhrmann(a)web.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi on a fresh install of tumbleweed (kernel 5.8) (and btw also on Leap 15.2 with Kernel 5.3) the nvidia driver 450.66 installation fails. The culprit seems to be that the make system complains about missing scripts/Makefile.kcsan Trying to report this to nvidia as well... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 1 day

[Bug 925275] New: NVIDIA Driver not installable

by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925275 Bug ID: 925275 Summary: NVIDIA Driver not installable Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201503* Hardware: x86-64 OS: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: fbernasek(a)netscape.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 629479 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=629479&action=edit nvidia driver install log install opensuse tumbleweed 20150329 no problems. after reboot i like to install the NVIDIA-346.47 or 349.12 with booth the same problem can't install the driver. now i update with the kernel from the kernel:stable repositories the same problem. 20150328 the same problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 1 day

[Bug 1004201] New: System hangs during boot due to loop trying to load nvidia modules

by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1004201 Bug ID: 1004201 Summary: System hangs during boot due to loop trying to load nvidia modules Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.1 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: marcelo.jimenez(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- lspci is: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1) Nvidia site explicitly says that the 367.44 driver does support GT 730. In my opinion, there are two problems here: 1 - The system initialization should not loop forever trying to load a module it has already tryed to load and failed 2 - The 367.44 NVIDIA driver should support my hardware. The NVRM messages repeat forever: ... Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia_modeset: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 systemd-journal[120]: Journal started Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia_modeset: Unknown symbol nvidia_register_module (err 0) Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia_modeset: Unknown symbol nvidia_get_rm_ops (err 0) Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia_modeset: Unknown symbol nvidia_unregister_module (err 0) Oct 09 09:17:23 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Started Journal Service. ... Oct 09 09:17:31 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Mounting /home... Oct 09 09:17:31 linux-af78 mtp-probe[579]: checking bus 6, device 2: "/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/usb6/6-1" Oct 09 09:17:31 linux-af78 mtp-probe[578]: checking bus 5, device 2: "/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb5/5-2" Oct 09 09:17:31 linux-af78 mtp-probe[578]: bus: 5, device: 2 was not an MTP device Oct 09 09:17:31 linux-af78 mtp-probe[579]: bus: 6, device: 2 was not an MTP device Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:01:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The Unknown NVIDIA G8x Series GPU installed in this NVRM: system is not supported through the 367.44 NVIDIA NVRM: driver. You can try the NVIDIA 340.xx Legacy drivers. NVRM: Please visit http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html NVRM: for download information. The 367.44 NVIDIA driver NVRM: will ignore this GPU. Continuing probe... Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -1 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Nvlink Core is being initialized, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA probe routine failed for 1 device(s). Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: None of the NVIDIA graphics adapters were initialized! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Unregistered the Nvlink Core, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: NVIDIA init module failed! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Mounted /home. Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Starting Local File Systems. Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Reached target Local File Systems. Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Starting Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data... Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Starting Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage... Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:01:00.0,olddecodes=none,decodes=none:owns=io+mem Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The Unknown NVIDIA G8x Series GPU installed in this NVRM: system is not supported through the 367.44 NVIDIA NVRM: driver. You can try the NVIDIA 340.xx Legacy drivers. NVRM: Please visit http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html NVRM: for download information. The 367.44 NVIDIA driver NVRM: will ignore this GPU. Continuing probe... Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -1 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Nvlink Core is being initialized, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA probe routine failed for 1 device(s). Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: None of the NVIDIA graphics adapters were initialized! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Unregistered the Nvlink Core, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: NVIDIA init module failed! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:01:00.0,olddecodes=none,decodes=none:owns=io+mem Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The Unknown NVIDIA G8x Series GPU installed in this NVRM: system is not supported through the 367.44 NVIDIA NVRM: driver. You can try the NVIDIA 340.xx Legacy drivers. NVRM: Please visit http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html NVRM: for download information. The 367.44 NVIDIA driver NVRM: will ignore this GPU. Continuing probe... Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -1 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Nvlink Core is being initialized, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA probe routine failed for 1 device(s). Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: None of the NVIDIA graphics adapters were initialized! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: nvidia-nvlink: Unregistered the Nvlink Core, major device number 246 Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: NVRM: NVIDIA init module failed! Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 systemd[1]: Started Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data. Oct 09 09:17:32 linux-af78 kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:01:00.0,olddecodes=none,decodes=none:owns=io+mem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 2 days

[Bug 1179981] New: EFI on raid1: grub2-install fails to update nvram

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179981 Bug ID: 1179981 Summary: EFI on raid1: grub2-install fails to update nvram Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Leap 15.2 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: jjletho67-esus(a)yahoo.it QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 844418 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=844418&action=edit Partitions layout I installed openSUSE LEAP 15.2 on a kvm virtual machine with ovmf firmware. My disks layout is configured for a full redundancy, so the efi partition is on raid1 (I've already used this layout on openSUSE 42.3 and by doc it should be supported https://doc.opensuse.org/documentation/leap/startup/single-html/book-opensu…) I'm attaching the partition layout. All file systems are ext4, secureboot is disabled The machine has worked fine ( i rebooted severak times) until i performed a a full patch (zypper patch). At the next reboot grub was not able to boot the os and stop with the error: "error: verification requested but nobody cares" I immediately found this bug https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175766 but the solving patch was already installed. Curiously i was able to boot with the installation disk, selecting the "boot from hard disk" option. I tried to launch grub2-install --verbose manually and it ended up with this error: " ... grub2-install: info: copying `/boot/grub2/x86_64-efi/core.efi' -> `/boot/efi/EFI/opensuse/grubx64.efi'. grub2-install: info: Registering with EFI: distributor = `opensuse', path = `\EFI\opensuse\grubx64.efi', ESP at mduuid/9182c46b9d469f79b48850b68f3371a5. grub2-install: info: executing efibootmgr --version </dev/null >/dev/null. grub2-install: info: executing modprobe -q efivars. grub2-install: info: executing efibootmgr -c -d. efibootmgr: option requires an argument -- 'd' efibootmgr version 14 usage: efibootmgr [options] -a | --active sets bootnum active -A | --inactive sets bootnum inactive -b | --bootnum XXXX modify BootXXXX (hex) -B | --delete-bootnum delete bootnum (specified with -b) --delete delete entry by bootnum (-b), by UUID (-P) or by disk+partition[+file] (-d -p -l) -c | --create create new variable bootnum and add to bootorder -C | --create-only create new variable bootnum and do not ... " My speculation is that efibootmgr hasn't the disks parameter due to the raid configuration of the efi partition. Some updated packages has "lost" the ability to deal properly with EFI on raid1 STEP TO REPRODUCE: Install LEAP 15.2 with the same partitions layout described above. Perform a "zypper patch" and reboot it ACTUAL RESULTS: the system does not boot, grub stops with "error: verification requested but nobody cares" EXPECTED RESULTS: the system continues to boot properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 2 days

[Bug 1188608] New: openblas 0.3.16 causes segfaults

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188608 Bug ID: 1188608 Summary: openblas 0.3.16 causes segfaults Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: code(a)bnavigator.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- From the comments on the package in openSUSE:Factory https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/openblas#comment-1… Andre Barros Please, update to OpenBLAS to 3.17, as some optimizations were causing segfaults and reverted. See: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/develop/Changelog.txt. Andre Barros It seems that octave 6.3.0 build failures (on test phase) may be associated to this on Tumbleweed. Andre Barros OK, this really needs a better explanation. I have Tumbleweed and Leap 15.3 installed on different computers, and on both of them I use the Science repo to provide some more packages I need. Downgrading to default versions (3.13 on Leap and 3.14 on Tumbleweed) fixes the problem with Octave, as I was able to build version 6.3 and also run the tests (make check-local) without unknown failures. It probably affects other numerical packages too. Regards, Andr� ---- Packages where I see this: python-photutils python-astropy:test many more -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 2 days

[Bug 1027519] New: Xen: Missing upstream bug fixes

by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027519 Bug ID: 1027519 Summary: Xen: Missing upstream bug fixes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Xen Assignee: xen-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: carnold(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- There are upstream patches fixing bugs needed for this version of Xen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 3 days

[Bug 1184069] New: GRUB on a crypted partition takes > 10 seconds to unlock the filesystem

by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1184069 Bug ID: 1184069 Summary: GRUB on a crypted partition takes > 10 seconds to unlock the filesystem Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: p.heinlein(a)heinlein-support.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I installed 15.2 plain vanilla on a Thinkpad X1.Extreme Gen.3 with a ~2 TB NVME and I set a crypto disc password during installation (in YaST). Grub needs > 10 seconds to unlock the key, so booting is very slow. It's very similar to https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/369414/grub-takes-too-long-to-unlo… https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=228865 so I also think, that the crypto or number of iterations is way to expensive here and needs too much time. Maybe the SUSE team should/could look for a similar safe, but faster method (SHA256?) here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 3 days

[Bug 1127690] New: haveged: Couldn't initialize HAVEGE rng 9

by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127690 Bug ID: 1127690 Summary: haveged: Couldn't initialize HAVEGE rng 9 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: ro(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- haveged can not be started on the mustang boards when running leap 51.1 adding the "--data 16" option as workaround allows starting the daemon, please see also: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866306 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 weeks, 3 days

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
282
Older →

Jump to page:

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Bugs August 2021