August 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1173510] VUL-1: CVE-2020-4067: coturn: information leak across client connections
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173510 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173510#c5 Johannes Weberhofer <jweberhofer(a)weberhofer.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Johannes Weberhofer <jweberhofer(a)weberhofer.at> --- An updated has been released at 2020-07-07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1161803] security/fail2ban: Bug - current version 0.10.4 fails to start due to bug in config read before/after > fixed in 0.10.5
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161803 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161803#c1 Johannes Weberhofer <jweberhofer(a)weberhofer.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Johannes Weberhofer <jweberhofer(a)weberhofer.at> --- The version has been upgraded to 0.11.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189022] New: The 'cinnamon' pattern is missing the latest 'muffin 5.0.1' package - muffin 5.0.0 is buggy
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189022 Bug ID: 1189022 Summary: The 'cinnamon' pattern is missing the latest 'muffin 5.0.1' package - muffin 5.0.0 is buggy Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Patterns Assignee: dimstar(a)opensuse.org Reporter: nsleasy(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The latest Muffin 5.0.1 update is required for Cinnamon 5.0.x to avoid the new window focus problem found in Muffin 5.0.0 in the X11 environment. This update should be available from the Mint Cinnamon team and the RPM is available in other distributions. Using the standard GNOME mutter compositor in the X11 environment and the Cinnamon muffin 5.0.0 compositor, a 2nd LibreOffice document opened from a file manager will lack proper focus. Updating muffin from 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 should fix this problem. I was not able to find this update even in the Factory repositories. ==> As a side question, is there any chance of getting the Cinnamon DE included in the standard DVD installation iso? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1189261] New: SuSEfirewall2-fail2ban package missing
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189261 Bug ID: 1189261 Summary: SuSEfirewall2-fail2ban package missing Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: ralf.koelmel(a)kit.edu QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- SuSEfirewall2-fail2ban package, which was still available in Leap 15.2, is missing in Leap 15.3. It would be nice to have this small systemd integration package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1189099] multipath-tools fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189099 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189099#c3 Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- Great, then it's definitely fixed in the devel project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189079] [META] glibc 2.34 packages failures
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189079 Bug 1189079 depends on bug 1189099, which changed state. Bug 1189099 Summary: multipath-tools fails with glibc 2.34 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189099 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189099] multipath-tools fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189099 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189099#c2 Martin Wilck <martin.wilck(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #2 from Martin Wilck <martin.wilck(a)suse.com> --- The multipath-tools version in Base:System has had the fix for some time. Not sure why the bot didn't update this bug. It has hit factory today it seems. (multipath-tools-0.8.6+32+suse.f11c192) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188914] [Build H.401.1] openQA test fails in podman - libcontainer-common update suspected of breaking podman tests
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c14 --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Vicenzi <alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Aleksa Sarai from comment #12) > As far as I can tell from the upstream bug reports, this issue was already > fixed in runc 1.0.0 which has been released in Factory for quite a while now > (I just submitted 1.0.2). I don't think it's been submitted to SLE yet > because we haven't had a relevant BZ bug or Docker release, but I can submit > it to SLE now if you like. I need to retest and ensure it's fixed, will do it soon. About SLE, not sure, this issue was open for TW, but I guess we would have the same problem there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188914] [Build H.401.1] openQA test fails in podman - libcontainer-common update suspected of breaking podman tests
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c13 Alexandre Vicenzi <alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(alexandre.vicenzi | |(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Vicenzi <alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dario Faggioli from comment #11) > (In reply to Dario Faggioli from comment #10) > > (In reply to Alexandre Vicenzi from comment #9) > > > New SR going back to runc: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/913740 > > > > > > We need to look into alternative solutions for now. > > > > > *I think* it should be possible to make libkrun support conditional on the > > actual arch, i.e., only enable it for x86 and aarch64. > > > > Would that be acceptable? > > > FWIW, I tried to do that here: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:dfaggioli:branches: > Virtualization:containers/crun > > I tested it quickly on x86, and it seems to work fine (both when using and > not using libkrun). > > alexandre.vicenzi(a)suse.com do we have a way to test it on the other arches? > Also, do we want me to enable the build for more of them? At least AFAICS on > OBS, s390 and ppc64le are building fine now... Would be nice to build for architectures that are in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:kubic, but I guess that's covered in your branch. s390 and ppc64le are available in our labs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189580] security: when enabling SELinux during install apparmor is still present
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189580 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189580#c7 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FEATURE Flags|needinfo?(jreidinger(a)suse.c | |om), | |needinfo?(dgonzalez(a)suse.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- I've created a feature request https://jira.suse.com/browse/PM-2920 Please add your comment there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0