openSUSE Bugs June 2021

bugs@lists.opensuse.org

1 participants
3654 discussions

[Bug 1183890] [Build 20210320] openQA test fails in welcome - NET ISO is stuck on linuxrc blue screen
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183890 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183890#c6 --- Comment #6 from Oliver Kurz <okurz(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script: This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: create_hdd_tumbleweed https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1762720 To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed: 1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted 2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" 3. The label in the openQA scenario is removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1120256] [Build 40.3] openQA test fails in grub_test - textmode installation takes longer than others to exiting installer
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120256 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120256#c60 --- Comment #60 from Oliver Kurz <okurz(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script: This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: autoyast_bug-887126_autoinst https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5990319 To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed: 1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted 2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" 3. The label in the openQA scenario is removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1184243] [Build 117.13] yast online updates fails at no update repositories being present
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184243 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184243#c8 --- Comment #8 from openQA Review <openqa-review(a)suse.de> --- This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script: This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: yast2_gui https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1757680 To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed: 1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted 2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" 3. The label in the openQA scenario is removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186715] New: [Tumbleweed][openssl][libressl] older "/usr/bin/openssl" command gave wrong return code
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186715 Bug ID: 1186715 Summary: [Tumbleweed][openssl][libressl] older "/usr/bin/openssl" command gave wrong return code Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The issue might be a corner one. And it might have something to do with bug https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186649 However, It is very strange that, when the command reports an error msg, it still returns 0. Here comes the reproduce steps: 1. install the older openssl cli with command "zypper in 'openssl(cli)', and the only libressl is installed. susetest:~ # rpm -qf /usr/bin/openssl libressl-3.3.3-1.2.x86_64 2. I tried to run "rehash" command, it reports error susetest:~ # /usr/bin/openssl rehash /etc/openldap openssl:Error: 'rehash' is an invalid command. Standard commands asn1parse ca certhash ciphers cms crl crl2pkcs7 dgst dh dhparam dsa dsaparam ec ecparam enc errstr gendh gendsa genpkey genrsa nseq ocsp passwd pkcs12 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkey pkeyparam pkeyutl prime rand req rsa rsautl s_client s_server s_time sess_id smime speed spkac ts verify version x509 Message Digest commands (see the `dgst' command for more details) gost-mac md4 md5 md_gost94 ripemd160 sha1 sha224 sha256 sha384 sha512 sm3 sm3WithRSAEncryption streebog256 streebog512 whirlpool Cipher commands (see the `enc' command for more details) aes-128-cbc aes-128-ecb aes-192-cbc aes-192-ecb aes-256-cbc aes-256-ecb base64 bf bf-cbc bf-cfb bf-ecb bf-ofb camellia-128-cbc camellia-128-ecb camellia-192-cbc camellia-192-ecb camellia-256-cbc camellia-256-ecb cast cast-cbc cast5-cbc cast5-cfb cast5-ecb cast5-ofb chacha des des-cbc des-cfb des-ecb des-ede des-ede-cbc des-ede-cfb des-ede-ofb des-ede3 des-ede3-cbc des-ede3-cfb des-ede3-ofb des-ofb des3 desx idea idea-cbc idea-cfb idea-ecb idea-ofb rc2 rc2-40-cbc rc2-64-cbc rc2-cbc rc2-cfb rc2-ecb rc2-ofb rc4 rc4-40 sm4 sm4-cbc sm4-cfb sm4-ecb sm4-ofb However, the return code is 0 (IMO, it should return non-zero code) susetest:~ # echo $? 0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1182864] pcre2: build with --enable-jit-sealloc may segfault consumers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182864 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182864#c11 --- Comment #11 from Marcus R�ckert <mrueckert(a)suse.com> --- ``` #0 sljit_malloc_exec (size=1912) at src/sljit/sljitProtExecAllocator.c:338 338 header->prev_size = chunk_size; (gdb) bt #0 sljit_malloc_exec (size=1912) at src/sljit/sljitProtExecAllocator.c:338 #1 0x00007f5d720c711e in sljit_generate_code (compiler=compiler@entry=0x55c954ed7c00) at src/sljit/sljitNativeX86_common.c:509 #2 0x00007f5d720f79fb in jit_compile (code=code@entry=0x55c954ec2f40, mode=mode@entry=1) at src/pcre2_jit_compile.c:14066 #3 0x00007f5d720fad7d in pcre2_jit_compile_8 (code=0x55c954ec2f40, options=options@entry=1) at src/pcre2_jit_compile.c:14220 #4 0x00007f5d72fbca2d in rspamd_regexp_post_process (r=0x55c9543b9810) at /usr/src/debug/rspamd-2.7-30.11.x86_64/src/libutil/regexp.c:184 ``` after this GDB was killed for OOM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182864] pcre2: build with --enable-jit-sealloc may segfault consumers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182864 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182864#c10 Marcus R�ckert <mrueckert(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrueckert(a)suse.com --- Comment #10 from Marcus R�ckert <mrueckert(a)suse.com> --- Could this be the same reason why i see: ``` Stack trace of thread 31844: #0 0x00007f5d720c6f11 n/a (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x28f11) #1 0x00007f5d720c711e n/a (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x2911e) #2 0x00007f5d720f79fb n/a (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x599fb) #3 0x00007f5d720fad7d pcre2_jit_compile_8 (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x5cd7d) #4 0x00007f5d72fbca2d rspamd_regexp_new (librspamd-server.so + 0xb5a2d) #5 0x00007f5d72fbd436 rspamd_regexp_cache_create (librspamd-server.so + 0xb6436) #6 0x00007f5d7307c360 lua_regexp_create_cached (librspamd-server.so + 0x175360) #7 0x00007f5d72e877aa n/a (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0xb7aa) #8 0x00007f5d72ee68c2 n/a (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0x6a8c2) #9 0x00007f5d72e877aa n/a (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0xb7aa) #10 0x00007f5d72ee68c2 n/a (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0x6a8c2) #11 0x00007f5d72e877aa n/a (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0xb7aa) #12 0x00007f5d72e98599 lua_pcall (libluajit-5.1.so.2 + 0x1c599) #13 0x00007f5d73064f12 rspamd_lua_require_function (librspamd-server.so + 0x15df12) #14 0x00007f5d7305483b rspamd_message_process (librspamd-server.so + 0x14d83b) #15 0x00007f5d7301780d rspamd_task_process (librspamd-server.so + 0x11080d) #16 0x00007f5d730176e7 rspamd_task_process (librspamd-server.so + 0x1106e7) #17 0x00007f5d730176e7 rspamd_task_process (librspamd-server.so + 0x1106e7) #18 0x00007f5d730176e7 rspamd_task_process (librspamd-server.so + 0x1106e7) #19 0x000055c951b75924 rspamd_worker_body_handler (rspamd + 0x19924) #20 0x00007f5d7302a603 rspamd_http_on_message_complete (librspamd-server.so + 0x123603) #21 0x00007f5d730bd8fe http_parser_execute (librspamd-server.so + 0x1b68fe) #22 0x00007f5d73027e54 rspamd_http_event_handler (librspamd-server.so + 0x120e54) #23 0x00007f5d72b95036 ev_invoke_pending (librspamd-ev.so + 0x5036) #24 0x00007f5d72b9889f ev_run (librspamd-ev.so + 0x889f) #25 0x000055c951b76580 start_worker (rspamd + 0x1a580) #26 0x00007f5d73022ab9 rspamd_fork_worker (librspamd-server.so + 0x11bab9) #27 0x000055c951b73f20 rspamd_fork_delayed_cb (rspamd + 0x17f20) #28 0x00007f5d72b95036 ev_invoke_pending (librspamd-ev.so + 0x5036) #29 0x00007f5d72b9889f ev_run (librspamd-ev.so + 0x889f) #30 0x000055c951b695d2 main (rspamd + 0xd5d2) #31 0x00007f5d729e6b35 __libc_start_main (libc.so.6 + 0x27b35) #32 0x000055c951b69b0e _start (rspamd + 0xdb0e) ``` and ``` Stack trace of thread 1110: #0 0x00007f5d720c6e7b n/a (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x28e7b) #1 0x00007f5d720fb013 n/a (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0x5d013) #2 0x00007f5d720aca1a pcre2_code_free_8 (libpcre2-8.so.0 + 0xea1a) #3 0x00007f5d72fb42e8 n/a (/usr/lib64/rspamd/librspamd-server.so (deleted) + 0xad2e8) ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186593] Leap 15.3 is missing Backports update and SLE Update repo definitions
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186593 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186593#c32 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nwr10cst-oslnx@ya | |hoo.com) --- Comment #32 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- Neil, can you PLS run `zypper patch`? We need to know if this produces the same output. If that is the case, solver testcase could help a lot. See https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Report_a_YaST_bug#I_want_to_report_a_bug_r… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1173619] VUL-0: unbound: LPE from unbound to root
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173619 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173619#c14 --- Comment #14 from Michael Str�der <michael(a)stroeder.com> --- (In reply to Wolfgang Frisch from comment #13) > Michael, can you please have a look and adjust the .spec file? The attached > patch should do the trick. Hmm, does this affect intended usage of unbound-control? The man-page is not clear on that. Personally I'm in the camp to lock down everything as much as possible. That's e.g. one reason why I object to CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE. But for a general purpose package we unfortunately have to clarify whether changes to the .spec file makes using some features impossible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186692] CDC ACM speed regression from LEAP 15.2 Kernel 5.3 to KOTD
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186692 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186692#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu- | |darmstadt.de, | |oneukum(a)suse.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(bon(a)elektron.ikp. | |physik.tu-darmstadt.de) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Uwe Bonnes from comment #1) > Is there some archive of KOTDs or a simple way to bisect the SUSE kernel? There is no official archive, but you can find some kernel packages in my OBS repos, e.g. OBS home:tiwai:kernel:5.9, home:tiwai:kernel:5.10, ... It'd be helpful if you can narrow down which kernel version starts showing the regression. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1173619] VUL-0: unbound: LPE from unbound to root
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173619 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173619#c13 --- Comment #13 from Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 849858 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=849858&action=edit unbound-640.patch (In reply to Detlef Eppers from comment #5) > This leaves us with the second issue, unrelated to the first. > After having dropped privileges, I believe that Unbound should > not be able to write to its configuration file any more, as this > hands user unbound control over the Unbound server running as root > during next start. > > I cannot verify at the moment if this is still the case, but > /etc/unbound/conf.d/example.com.conf and > /etc/unbound/local.d/block-example.com.conf used to be sourced from > /etc/unbound/unbound.conf. > At the same time these files used to be writable by user unbound. Indeed, the example configs are still sourced, and I see no reason why they would have to be writable by the `unbound` user. Michael, can you please have a look and adjust the .spec file? The attached patch should do the trick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Bugs June 2021