October 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1167866] New: [Build 20200325] yast2 inst_release_notes: no rel notes shown
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167866 Bug ID: 1167866 Summary: [Build 20200325] yast2 inst_release_notes: no rel notes shown Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1215118/modules/libq t5_qtbase/steps/28 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_on_gnome@64bit fails in [libqt5_qtbase](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1215118/modules/libqt5_qtb… https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Factory/yast2-installatio… yast2-installation dropped the recommends on release-notes, which we consider wrong. This package contains the inst_release_notes module to show the release notes and is thus the most logical place to also recommend the installation of said notes it wants to show to the user. ## Test suite description Maintainer: asmorodskyi, okurz. Extra tests which were designed to run on gnome ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20200309](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1199785) ## Expected result Last good: [20200307](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1198559) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1175288] New: [installcheck] ruby2.7-rubygem-tins is not installable
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175288 Bug ID: 1175288 Summary: [installcheck] ruby2.7-rubygem-tins is not installable Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Ruby Assignee: ruby-devel(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- > sudo zypper in ruby2.7-rubygem-tins Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... Problem: nothing provides rubygem(ruby:2.7.0:sync) >= 0 needed by ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 Solution 1: do not install ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 Solution 2: break ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1179196] New: [Build 20201124] openQA test fails in tflite2 - python-h5py fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179196 Bug ID: 1179196 Summary: [Build 20201124] openQA test fails in tflite2 - python-h5py fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606/modules/tfli te2/steps/28 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenStack Assignee: cloud-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_ai_ml@64bit fails in [tflite2](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606/modules/tflite2/steps/28) 0| 2020-11-25 06:51:05 <1> susetest(1502) [zypp::solver] SATResolver.cc(problems):1207 nothing provides libhdf5_hl100 = 1.10.5 needed by python3-h5py-2.10.0-2.4.x86_64 The issue there is that python-h5py failed to rebuild against the updated hdf package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/python-h… ## Test suite description Test AI/ML software ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20201124](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606) (current job) ## Expected result Last good: [20201123](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1482495) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1189868] New: [Build 20210825] 389ds: dsctl status fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189868 Bug ID: 1189868 Summary: [Build 20210825] 389ds: dsctl status fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1888017/modules/open ldap_to_389ds/steps/75 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-openldap_to_389ds@64bit fails in [openldap_to_389ds](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1888017/modules/openld… Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' WVImd-1- ## Test suite description ldap_to_389ds tools test Maintainer: wegao(a)suse.com ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20210825](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1887217) ## Expected result Last good: [20210824](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1885598) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1188283] New: vim: skeleton files loaded twice
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188283 Bug ID: 1188283 Summary: vim: skeleton files loaded twice Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is a rather long-standing issue (annoying, but easy to live with) starting 'vi newfile.spec' loads a skeleton into vi with a basic structure of a spec file - so far, so good. unfortunately, it loads the skeleton twice, which is kinda annoying the file comes from vim-data, and is installed in /usr/share/vim/vim82/skeletons (there exists a symlink usr/share/vim/current -> usr/share/vim/vim82) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1186338] New: mdbtools 0.9.3: invonsistent header being installed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186338 Bug ID: 1186338 Summary: mdbtools 0.9.3: invonsistent header being installed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Issue detected while building libgda against mbdtools 0.9.3: [ 66s] /usr/include/mdbtools.h:38:10: fatal error: mdbfakeglib.h: No such file or directory [ 66s] 38 | #include <mdbfakeglib.h> The problem there is that /usr/include/mdbtools.h does #ifdef HAVE_GLIB #include <glib.h> #else #include <mdbfakeglib.h> #endif This is probably something it tries to do for its own build system, but when building libgda, this now somewhat relies on 'something' setting HAVE_GLIB. One easy way out would be to inject -DHAVE_GLIB into the .pc file (after all, it has requires: glib-2.0, so we are sure to have glib) I tested that on a local build, which does indeed work around the issue in libgda (but then have different build failures, likely coming from API changes though) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1168937] New: [DuplicateBinaries] protoc-gen-go created by two sources
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168937 Bug ID: 1168937 Summary: [DuplicateBinaries] protoc-gen-go created by two sources Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- There are currently two source packages producing a protoc-gen-go binary package. This is not supported inside OBS and results in only one (random) version to be published in the repository. Duplicate binaries detected: x86_64: protoc-gen-go: - protoc-gen-go - golang-github-golang-protobuf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1066408] New: Deadbeef contains an invalid appdata.xml file
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066408 Bug ID: 1066408 Summary: Deadbeef contains an invalid appdata.xml file Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package deadbeef ships with an appdata.xml file (to show in socftware centers), but the file is invalid. (appstream-builder:17416): As-WARNING **: ignoring description '<description><_p>DeaDBeeF (as in 0xDEADBEEF)…' from ./tmp/deadbeef-0.7.2-4.2/usr/share/appdata/deadbeef.appdata.xml: Unknown tag '_p' Seems upstream prepared the file for translation, but then did not pass it through the translation process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1023737] New: openSUSE:Factory/golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023737 Bug ID: 1023737 Summary: openSUSE:Factory/golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build in openSUSE:Factory. Earlier notifications by email to the bugowner and Maintainer have remained without reaction / fix. If the package is not being fixed within 2 weeks, it will be scheduled for removal from Tumbleweed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1023734] New: openSUSE:Factory/golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023734 Bug ID: 1023734 Summary: openSUSE:Factory/golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build in openSUSE:Factory. Earlier notifications by email to the bugowner and Maintainer have remained without reaction / fix. If the package is not being fixed within 2 weeks, it will be scheduled for removal from Tumbleweed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1