January 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1169874] [Build 20200417] Failure to boot due to resume=/dev/disk/by-path
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169874 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169874#c28 Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ancor(a)suse.com) |needinfo?(fvogt(a)suse.com) --- Comment #28 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> --- OK, I check code and it really use that default, so if not defined, it should return true even without manually specified fallback. Still logs from save_y2logs can bring light into it why it is proposed this way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180607] Black screen after return from standby with kernel 5.10.4
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180607 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180607#c1 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(p.stolz77@googlem | |ail.com) --- Comment #1 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Does a kernel from Kernel:stable fix this? https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/Kernel:stable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169874] [Build 20200417] Failure to boot due to resume=/dev/disk/by-path
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169874 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169874#c27 --- Comment #27 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> --- I think it should use default from https://github.com/yast/yast-yast2/blob/6c0ec689bfeb4ff3449356fb88c159c604f… but let me check code -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180650] New: Salt requires an update for kernel 5.10 on non-x86 systems
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180650 Bug ID: 1180650 Summary: Salt requires an update for kernel 5.10 on non-x86 systems Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Salt Assignee: salt-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: afaerber(a)suse.com, dmueller(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- For non-x86, kernel 5.10 dropped support for long time deprecated /sys/firmware/efi/vars One should now use /sys/firmware/efi/efivars So, Salt requires an update for kernel 5.10 on non-x86 systems as some downstream patches still uses the old path: https://github.com/openSUSE/salt/blob/8e952ef34d6df20344a5a00b85647e149b3e1… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1180408] New: Installation fails on aarch64 in openQA since snapshot 20201224
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180408 Bug ID: 1180408 Summary: Installation fails on aarch64 in openQA since snapshot 20201224 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1527346/modules/awai t_install/steps/135 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-aarch64-create_hdd_gnome@aarch64 fails in [await_install](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1527346/modules/await_inst… The problem is grub2-install cannot find EFI directory. I suspect the yast2-storage-ng update: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/858168 ## Test suite description image creation job used as parent for other jobs testing based on existing installation. GUI-Installation and selecting the gnome desktop during installation. ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20201224](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1526989) ## Expected result Last good: [20201218](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1515964) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=aarch64&distri=opensu… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1180648] VUL-1: CVE-2021-21236: CairoSVG is a Python (pypi) package. CairoSVG is an SVG converter based on Cairo. In CairoSVG before version 2.5.1, there is a regular expression denial of service (REDoS) vulnerability. When processing SVG files, the
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180648 Maintenance Robot <maint-coord+maintenance_robot(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174307] VUL-0: gdk-pixbuf: integer underflow in the GIF loader
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174307 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174307#c3 Jia Zhaocong <zcjia(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(wolfgang.frisch@s | |use.com) --- Comment #3 from Jia Zhaocong <zcjia(a)suse.com> --- Hi Wolfgang, although the fix was released to Tumbleweed, but when I am doing another gdk-pixbuf CVE fixing, I find that this bug actually affects (at least) SLE-15-SP2. Can you give this another look please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180497] In /etc/hosts Localhost declared valid both for IPV4 and IPV6 loop interfaces breaks some local servers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180497 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180497#c1 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |kukuk(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- The developers are not correct, using two different names for 127.0.0.1 and ::1 will break most dual-stack applications or IPv6 only installations, as localhost would suddenly no longer be reachable. All linux distributions I'm aware of have something like this: 127.0.0.1 localhost ... ::1 localhost ... It is quite common that names resolve to an IPv4 and an IPv6 address (or even multiple ones). To me it looks more like they don't expect that a hostname can resolve to more than an IP address and that they need to adjust their code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180646] New: weechat gnutls fails to handshake with irc.freenode.net
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180646 Bug ID: 1180646 Summary: weechat gnutls fails to handshake with irc.freenode.net Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I can no longer connect to irc.freenode.net:6697 using TLS. 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- irc: connecting to server chat.freenode.net/6697 (SSL)... 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- gnutls: connected using 2048-bit Diffie-Hellman shared secret exchange 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- gnutls: receiving 2 certificates 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- - certificate[1] info: 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- - subject `CN=cherryh.freenode.net', issuer `CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US', serial 0x036e974628cdb62f9573da5f2026d2d6f08d, RSA key 4096 bits, signed using RSA-SHA256, activated `2020-12-21 04:36:36 UTC', expires `2021-03-21 04:36:36 UTC', pin-sha256="L/oAJaKLkR6Xc+xTQ7hGlDy1bSKrBxhAe1XX5nEKhd8=" 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- - certificate[2] info: 2021-01-07 09:44:18 -- - subject `CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US', issuer `CN=DST Root CA X3,O=Digital Signature Trust Co.', serial 0x400175048314a4c8218c84a90c16cddf, RSA key 2048 bits, signed using RSA-SHA256, activated `2020-10-07 19:21:40 UTC', expires `2021-09-29 19:21:40 UTC', pin-sha256="jQJTbIh0grw0/1TkHSumWb+Fs0Ggogr621gT3PvPKG0=" 2021-01-07 09:44:18 =!= gnutls: peer's certificate is NOT trusted 2021-01-07 09:44:18 =!= gnutls: peer's certificate issuer is unknown 2021-01-07 09:44:18 =!= irc: TLS handshake failed 2021-01-07 09:44:18 =!= irc: error: Error in the certificate. However, gnutls-cli verifies the host successfuly: maciek@sloop:~ gnutls-cli irc.freenode.net:6697 <<< 1 �� Processed 414 CA certificate(s). Resolving 'irc.freenode.net:6697'... Connecting to '38.229.70.22:6697'... - Successfully sent 0 certificate(s) to server. - Server has requested a certificate. - Certificate type: X.509 - Got a certificate list of 2 certificates. - Certificate[0] info: - subject `CN=card.freenode.net', issuer `CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US', serial 0x03032b92fa80b713489a422d961becbf9683, RSA key 4096 bits, signed using RSA-SHA256, activated `2020-12-21 05:48:33 UTC', expires `2021-03-21 05:48:33 UTC', pin-sha256="kK+ut4A5qoGqyxfORm/2KPeU2VoCvz5WGDdesWNtNVY=" Public Key ID: sha1:53120e4f66b512f3f82597b1e0f0384e60a0a58d sha256:90afaeb78039aa81aacb17ce466ff628f794d95a02bf3e5618375eb1636d3556 Public Key PIN: pin-sha256:kK+ut4A5qoGqyxfORm/2KPeU2VoCvz5WGDdesWNtNVY= - Certificate[1] info: - subject `CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US', issuer `CN=DST Root CA X3,O=Digital Signature Trust Co.', serial 0x400175048314a4c8218c84a90c16cddf, RSA key 2048 bits, signed using RSA-SHA256, activated `2020-10-07 19:21:40 UTC', expires `2021-09-29 19:21:40 UTC', pin-sha256="jQJTbIh0grw0/1TkHSumWb+Fs0Ggogr621gT3PvPKG0=" - Status: The certificate is trusted. - Description: (TLS1.3-X.509)-(ECDHE-SECP256R1)-(RSA-PSS-RSAE-SHA256)-(AES-256-GCM) - Options: - Handshake was completed - Simple Client Mode: :card.freenode.net NOTICE * :*** Looking up your hostname... :card.freenode.net NOTICE * :*** Checking Ident :card.freenode.net NOTICE * :*** No Ident response :card.freenode.net NOTICE * :*** Found your hostname Package versions: gnutls-3.6.15-2.1.x86_64 libgnutls30-32bit-3.6.15-2.1.x86_64 libgnutls30-3.6.15-2.1.x86_64 libgnutls-dane0-3.6.15-2.1.x86_64 weechat-3.0-1.2.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177430] dwz fails on testsuite for aarch64
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177430 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177430#c6 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries <tdevries(a)suse.com> --- Fixed upstream at https://sourceware.org/git/?p=dwz.git;a=commit;h=282322d59df6cbf3b0af572077… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0