September 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1175919] For man and associated programs update-alternatives still has symlinks pointing to /usr/lib/man-db instead of /usr/libexec/man-db after dup to TW 20200826
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175919 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175919#c9 --- Comment #9 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1175919) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/831015 Factory / man -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175967] zypper dup from Tumbleweed 20200824 -> 20200826 fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175967 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175967#c2 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fvogt(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- Tumbleweed's rpm knows zstd for quite a long time now. What's the output of "rpm -qi rpm"? It's probably stuck at some ancient version for some reason (broken repos?) or something else on the system overwrites it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175984] zypper dup (15.1->15.2) requires OpenSUSE Leap 15.1 DVD medium
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175984 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175984#c2 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fvogt(a)suse.com, | |Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensb | |urg.de Component|Upgrade Problems |YaST2 Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Flags| |needinfo?(Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.u | |ni-regensburg.de) --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- Sounds like you added the 15.1 DVD as repo some time ago and didn't remove it before running zypper dup. If you didn't do it manually, YaST probably did it during install. IIRC it's supposed to remove it later though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175266] [glibc2.32] ceph build failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175266 Nathan Cutler <ncutler(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ncutler(a)suse.com |ddiss(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175266] [glibc2.32] ceph build failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175266 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175266#c6 David Disseldorp <ddiss(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ddiss(a)suse.com --- Comment #6 from David Disseldorp <ddiss(a)suse.com> --- I've updated the upstream bug... >From the glibc 2.32 release notes: The functions sigabbrev_np and sigdescr_np have been added. The sigabbrev_np returns the abbreviated signal name (e.g. "HUP" for SIGHUP) while sigdescr_np returns a string describing the signal number (e.g "Hangup" for SIGHUP). Different than strsignal, sigdescr_np does not attempt to translate the return description, both functions return NULL for an invalid signal number. They should be used instead of sys_siglist or sys_sigabbrev and they are both thread and async-signal safe. These functions are GNU extensions. I'll propose a patch to use sigabbrev_np() if available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175268] [glibc2.32] kbuild build failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175268 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175268#c6 Martin Liška <martin.liska(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- Thank you for the fix, but it still fails in :C staging: $ osc co devel:tools:building/kbuild $ cd devel:tools:building/kbuild $ osc build --alternative-project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C standard ... [ 60s] @gcc -c -O2 -g -O3 -m64 -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/src/kash -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/src/lib -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/src/lib/kStuff/include -DKBUILD_VERSION_MAJOR=0 -DKBUILD_VERSION_MINOR=1 -DKBUILD_VERSION_PATCH=9998 -DKBUILD_OS_LINUX -DKBUILD_ARCH_AMD64 -Dlint -DSHELL -DSMALL -DSH_FORKED_MODE -DNDEBUG -DBSD -Wp,-MD,/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/gen/arith.o.dep -Wp,-MT,/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/gen/arith.o -Wp,-MP -o /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/gen/arith.o /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/arith.c [ 60s] kBuild: Compiling kash - /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/arith.c [ 60s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/arith.c:160:10: fatal error: arith.tab.h: No such file or directory [ 60s] 160 | #include "arith.tab.h" [ 60s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 60s] compilation terminated. [ 60s] kmk: *** [/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/kBuild/footer-pass2-compiling-targets.kmk:272: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kbuild-0.1.9998svn3427/out/linux.amd64/release/obj/kash/gen/arith.o] Error 1 [ 60s] kmk: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175266] [glibc2.32] ceph build failure
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175266 Nathan Cutler <ncutler(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://tracker.ceph.com/is | |sues/47187 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1133893] New: Incorrect colors being displayed by "display" for a 10-bit LUT (it seems)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133893 Bug ID: 1133893 Summary: Incorrect colors being displayed by "display" for a 10-bit LUT (it seems) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: X11 Applications Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensburg.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 803995 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=803995&action=edit Windows-Shot of incorrect display When I use ImageMagick-7.0.7.34-lp150.2.26.1.x86_64 to display an image, the colors look significantly wrong, and the image is partly transparent. However when I open the same image on the same display with GIMP or Firefox, the image looks correct. The only special thing seems to be my "HDR" display featuring a 10-bit lookup-table (LUT) for my ATI Radeon: "ATI Baffin [Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X]" Driver: "amdgpu" The visual probably is like this: visual: visual id: 0x5af class: TrueColor depth: 32 planes available colormap entries: 1024 per subfield red, green, blue masks: 0x3ff00000, 0xffc00, 0x3ff significant bits in color specification: 10 bits -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 16

[Bug 1175919] For man and associated programs update-alternatives still has symlinks pointing to /usr/lib/man-db instead of /usr/libexec/man-db after dup to TW 20200826
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175919 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175919#c8 --- Comment #8 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1175919) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/830982 Factory / man -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175919] For man and associated programs update-alternatives still has symlinks pointing to /usr/lib/man-db instead of /usr/libexec/man-db after dup to TW 20200826
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Sep '20

01 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175919 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jslaby(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0