August 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1134289] New: ghostscript should not have a hard dependency on AppArmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Apr '22

08 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134289 Bug ID: 1134289 Summary: ghostscript should not have a hard dependency on AppArmor Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: AppArmor Assignee: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de Reporter: max(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- As a matter of personal preference I ususally set a "don't install" lock on AppArmor in my installations. But with sr#687694 a hard runtime dependency on apparmor-abstractions was added to the ghostscript package, which in turn pulls other AppArmor packages and makes it impossible to have an AppArmor-free system with ghostscript. As AppArmor is optional, I don't think packages like ghostscript should have such a hard dependency on it. Instead it should either be a weak dependency or no dependency at all. If a hard dependency is needed for some reason the AppArmor stuff for GS should be in an optional subpackage to retain the possibility to install GS without AppArmor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1162121] New: Installcheck issues with xml-commons-resolver10
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162121 Bug ID: 1162121 Summary: Installcheck issues with xml-commons-resolver10 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello current xml-commons-resolver submission seems to run into following issues https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/762685 can't install xml-commons-resolver10-1.4.01-lp152.8.35.noarch: package xerces-j2-2.12.0.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.xml.resolver), but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver10-1.4.01.noarch requires jaxp_parser_impl, but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver-1.2.noarch obsoletes xml-commons-resolver10 provided by xml-commons-resolver10-1.4.01.noarch can't install xml-commons-resolver11-1.4.01-lp152.8.35.noarch: package xerces-j2-2.12.0.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.xml.resolver), but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver11-1.4.01.noarch requires jaxp_parser_impl, but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver11-1.4.01.noarch obsoletes xml-commons-resolver <= 1.3.02 provided by xml-commons-resolver-1.2.noarch package xml-commons-resolver-1.2.noarch obsoletes xml-commons-resolver11 provided by xml-commons-resolver11-1.4.01.noarch can't install xml-commons-resolver12-1.4.01-lp152.8.35.noarch: package xerces-j2-2.12.0.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.xml.resolver), but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver12-1.4.01.noarch requires jaxp_parser_impl, but none of the providers can be installed package xml-commons-resolver-1.2.noarch obsoletes xml-commons-resolver12 provided by xml-commons-resolver12-1.4.01.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1115942] New: Fonts in all applications are green and magenta or have a cast of that
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115942 Bug ID: 1115942 Summary: Fonts in all applications are green and magenta or have a cast of that Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: asn(a)cryptomilk.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I've updated to Tumbleweed yesterday morning (2018-11-13) and then all fonts started to have a green an magenta case or are mostly green. See https://xor.cryptomilk.org/pics/fonts.png -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1101663] New: The %_jvmjardir macro is missing from the javapackages-tools package
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101663 Bug ID: 1101663 Summary: The %_jvmjardir macro is missing from the javapackages-tools package Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java Assignee: tchvatal(a)suse.com Reporter: mls(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- While cleaning up obsolete macros in rpm I found that all javapackage macros are now in the javapackages-tools package except %_jvmjardir. %_jvmjardir seems to be used in a couple of packages, so it would be good if that macro also is included in javapackages-tools. The current definition is: %_jvmjardir %{_libdir}/jvm-exports -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1071230] New: java installs symlinks that are not owned by a package
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071230 Bug ID: 1071230 Summary: java installs symlinks that are not owned by a package Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java Assignee: bnc-team-java(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- java packages install e.g /usr/bin/keytool managed by update-alternatives but those files are not owned by any package. Since the symlink in /usr does not actually change it should be owned by a package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 994084] New: Tracker bug: make packages own their symlinks in /etc/alternatives/*
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994084 Bug ID: 994084 Summary: Tracker bug: make packages own their symlinks in /etc/alternatives/* Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: vcuadradojuan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is a tracker bug for making all packages using update-alternatives own their symlinks at `/etc/alternatives/*`. Problem: Currently there is a mix of owned and not owned files by packages in `/etc/alternatives/*` (just look at `rpm -qf /etc/alternatives/*`). Currently there seems to be a sizeable chunk of packages not declaring `%ghost %_sysconfdir/alternatives/<binary>`, as specified at [1]. Also, see discussion on opensuse-factory m-l [2]. Once the mass bug filling for the issue is done, I will wait until 1 October for maintainers to action on the bugs, and afterwards I will start fixing each package by hand. Cheers, [1] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Multiple_Version_guidelines [2] https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2016-08/msg00218.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 37

[Bug 931978] New: VUL-0: CVE-2014-9721: zeromq: protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=931978 Bug ID: 931978 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2014-9721: zeromq: protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: tchvatal(a)suse.com Reporter: abergmann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- rh#1221666 ------------------------------------- It was discovered that zeromq, a lightweight messaging kernel, is susceptible to a protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol. This could allow remote attackers to bypass ZMTP v3 security mechanisms by sending ZMTP v2 or earlier headers. CVE request: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/07/8 Upstream bug report: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1273 Upstream fix: https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-x/commit/b6e3e0f601e2c1ec1f3aac880ed6a3fe… ------------------------------------- References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221666 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9721 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/515 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2014/CVE-2014-9721.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 12

[Bug 1105305] New: pencil doesn't run on Leap 15
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105305 Bug ID: 1105305 Summary: pencil doesn't run on Leap 15 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: aj(a)ajaissle.de Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- $ pencil Error: Platform version '60.1.0' is not compatible with minVersion >= 4.0 maxVersion <= 52.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1168389] New: transactional-update: umount of /proc failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Apr '22

04 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168389 Bug ID: 1168389 Summary: transactional-update: umount of /proc failed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: MicroOS Assignee: kubic-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: kukuk(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Generating grub configuration file ... Found theme: /boot/grub2/themes/openSUSE/theme.txt Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-5.5.13-1-default Found initrd image: /boot/initrd-5.5.13-1-default done 2020-04-02 00:29 ERROR: umount of proc failed! umount: /.snapshots/45/snapshot/proc: target is busy. USER PID ACCESS COMMAND /.snapshots/45/snapshot/proc:kernel root mount /proc COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME systemd 1 root 10r REG 0,5 0 12745 /proc/1/mountinfo systemd 1 root 14r REG 0,5 0 4026532071 /proc/swaps systemd-j 487 root 10r REG 0,5 0 12987 /proc/sys/kernel/hostname lsof 27267 root 3r DIR 0,5 0 1 /proc lsof 27267 root 6r DIR 0,5 0 11695155 /proc/27267/fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 22

[Bug 953735] New: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Apr '22

03 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=953735 Bug ID: 953735 Summary: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: ronisbr(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi! In Tumbleweed, I have been using the package qt-creator to develop Qt applications for a long time. I have always complained about the old version, since qt-creator is 3.2.2 and the newest version available is 3.5.1. However, it turns out that the newest version is already available in Tumbleweed (and in Leap) under the name libqt5-creator. Is there any good reason to name the package as libqt5-creator? I think this is very confusing. Since it has a lib* in the name, I did not even look at the description, so I was using a very old version all the time. Thus, I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of libqt5-creator to qt5-creator or something else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4