April 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1090358] New: [doc] we now default to firewalld
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090358 Bug ID: 1090358 Summary: [doc] we now default to firewalld Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: aj(a)suse.com QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- 1.1 Minimal System Installation https://doc.opensuse.org/release-notes/x86_64/openSUSE/Leap/15.0/#sec.insta… contains "Note that the minimal installation has no firewall by default. If you need one, install SuSEfirewall2". AFAIK it should be firewalld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1090240] New: document Qt/sddm hidpy options
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090240 Bug ID: 1090240 Summary: document Qt/sddm hidpy options Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com CC: fvogt(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- The options Fabian listed in https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1083873#c5 need to be documented in the release notes. QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR=1 can be passed on the bootloader command line of the installation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1085372] New: RN: add notes about font rendering change
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1085372 Bug ID: 1085372 Summary: RN: add notes about font rendering change Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: jengelh(a)inai.de QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 763734 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=763734&action=edit Original behavior aka interpreter v35 Please add this information to the release notes: In wanting to mimic the contemporary Microsoft Windows font rendering more closely, freetype 2.6.4 has changed the way it hints font glyphs. To restore the previous FreeType behavior, set the following environment variable at any level (system-wide, user-specific, or program-specific) of your choice. FREETYPE_PROPERTIES="truetype:interpreter-version=35" [2 screenshots for comparison] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1074097] New: RN: "systemctl stop apparmor" intentionally broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1074097 Bug ID: 1074097 Summary: RN: "systemctl stop apparmor" intentionally broken Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Please add this information about AppArmor to the Leap 15 release notes (copy&paste from https://blog.cboltz.de/archives/77-AppArmor-2.12-The-Grinch-is-confined!.ht… and assuming that Leap 15 will pick up AppArmor 2.12 or newer) --- One important change in the [AppArmor 2.12] packages is that I intentionally broke "systemctl stop apparmor". The reason for this is "systemctl restart apparmor" - systemd maps this to stop, followed by start. This resulted in unloading all AppArmor profiles by the "stop" part and, even if they get loaded again a second later, running processes will stay unconfined unless you restart them. The systemd developers were unwilling to implement the proposed ExecRestart= option for unit files, therefore breaking "stop" is the best thing I can do. (See boo#996520 and boo#853019 for more details.) "systemctl reload apparmor" will continue to work and is still the recommended way to reload the AppArmor profiles, but accidently typing "restart" instead of "reload" can easily happen. Therefore I chose to break "stop" - that's annoying, but more secure than accidently removing the AppArmor confinement from running processes. If you really want to unload all AppArmor profiles, you can use the new "aa-teardown" command which does what "systemctl stop apparmor" did before - but who would do that? ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1050519] New: Description about kernel graphics update
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1050519 Bug ID: 1050519 Summary: Description about kernel graphics update Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: tiwai(a)suse.com QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 733812 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=733812&action=edit Patch to release-notes.xml Some information about Leap 42.3 kernel graphics update, as Ludwig suggested in opensuse-factory ML. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1048692] New: version downgrade of libgcj_bc1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048692 Bug ID: 1048692 Summary: version downgrade of libgcj_bc1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: rguenther(a)suse.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- 42.2 vs 42.3: libgcj48: libgcj_bc1-4.8.5-24.14.x86_64 is older than libgcj_bc1-6.2.1+r239768-5.5.2.x86_64 in 42.2 libgcj_bc1 came from libgcj-gcc6 which isn't in 42.3. What is correct here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1048660] New: LibreOffice 5.3.3 update: Type 1 (Postscript) fonts are no longer supported.
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048660 Bug ID: 1048660 Summary: LibreOffice 5.3.3 update: Type 1 (Postscript) fonts are no longer supported. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.2 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: bugrprt21882(a)online.de QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- 13th July 2017: With the Leap 42.2 upgrade of LibreOffice from version 5.2.5 to version 5.3.3 the fact that, with version 5.3 LibreOffice has dropped support for Type 1 (Postscript) fonts was a not so pleasant surprise. Please consider placing a note indicating that, LibreOffice as of version 5.3 no longer supports Type 1 (Postscript) fonts in the Release Notes. Is also, possibly an issue for the Leap 42.3 Release Notes. --------------------------------------------------------- I haven't found anything in the LibreOffice Release Notes indicating this issue: <https://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/> There's only this article in "Linux Magazine": <http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blo…> There's information in this Document Foundation Bug Report: Bug 104701 <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104701> --------------------------------------------------------- There's possibly help for the folks (like me) with a suite of Type 1 fonts here: <https://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.2/system/afdko/> Haven't tried to build the "Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType" yet -- will happen later today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1048392] New: [doc] Extended Permission bits: Konqueror is also the Plasma 5 version
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048392 Bug ID: 1048392 Summary: [doc] Extended Permission bits: Konqueror is also the Plasma 5 version Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Release Notes Assignee: sknorr(a)suse.com Reporter: bugrprt21882(a)online.de QA Contact: lnussel(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- 3.2 Dolphin Does Not Set Extended Permission Bits https://doc.opensuse.org/release-notes/x86_64/openSUSE/Leap/42.3/#sec.gener… Unfortunately, with Leap 42.3, Konqueror is also the Plasma 5 version and, it also can not set the Extended Permissions bits . . . Therefore, the Leap 42.3, CLI only to toggle the Extended Permission bits . . . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1111572] New: patch segfaults if it can't write *.orig
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 May '22

11 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1111572 Bug ID: 1111572 Summary: patch segfaults if it can't write *.orig Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: jdelvare(a)suse.com Reporter: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 785784 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=785784&action=edit reproducer (tar.gz) Tumbleweed 20181009, patch-2.7.6-3.5.x86_64 I tried to apply a (non-matching) patch, and when patch tried to create the *.orig file, it printed a long list of error messages: # patch cleanprofile.py < changes.diff patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied [...] patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.orig : Permission denied patch: **** Can't create file cleanprofile.py.origSegmentation fault (core dumped) I'd expect _one_ "Permission denied" message, and no segfault. Reproducer: - unpack the attached tarball (as user) - chown root cleanprofile.py.orig (obviously as root) - run patch cleanprofile.py < changes.diff as user Note: This seems to be related to the files in the attached tarball. If I try with a simple one-line file and a boring patch, patch doesn't segfault. The reproducer files must have something special that send patch into an endless loop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1103239] New: valgrind doesn't understand -z separate-code linked objects
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 May '22

10 May '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103239 Bug ID: 1103239 Summary: valgrind doesn't understand -z separate-code linked objects Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: rguenther(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- When linking with -z separate-code (which is the default on x86_64 starting with binutils 2.31 currently in staging) valgrind doesn't seem to find debuginfo anymore. Reproduce like > echo 'int main() { return 0; }' | gcc -g -Wl,-z,separate-code -x c - > valgrind --tool=callgrind ./a.out > grep main callgrind.out.* fn=(220) (below main) fn=(14) dl_main while the correct one looks like cfn=(220) (below main) fn=(246) main fn=(14) dl_main -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5