April 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1084650] New: GCC 8: python-base is miscompiled
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jun '22

10 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084650 Bug ID: 1084650 Summary: GCC 8: python-base is miscompiled Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Due to that: https://bugs.python.org/issue27987#msg311323 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1081750] New: python tarfile uses random order
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jun '22

10 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1081750 Bug ID: 1081750 Summary: python tarfile uses random order Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: tchvatal(a)suse.com Blocks: 1041090 Found By: Development Blocker: --- There are various Factory packages that use the obs_scm service to generate source tarballs at build time. However, https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2263 is only accepted into python-3.7 so packages like obs-service-product_converter still produce different build results every time. IMHO we should do a backport of the patch. Upstream python was afraid that users might rely on files being handled in (unpredictable) filesystem order. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1078326] New: python-devel has dependency on /usr/bin/python3
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jun '22

10 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1078326 Bug ID: 1078326 Summary: python-devel has dependency on /usr/bin/python3 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Another bug discovered by accident - sh** happens :) python-devel (python2 variant) has a dependency on /usr/bin/python3 - which sounds just weird digging a bit into the files and their headers, the offending file seems to be (in pyton-devel): /usr/lib64/python2.7/test/bisect.py:#!/usr/bin/python3 It being installed in py2.7 directories should imply it also wants to use python2.7 There is a 2nd file in python-devel that references python3, but that is likely less damaging: /usr/lib64/python2.7/config/Makefile.pre:PYTHON_FOR_REGEN=python3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1073748] New: Segfault in libpython2.7.so.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jun '22

10 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073748 Bug ID: 1073748 Summary: Segfault in libpython2.7.so.1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: daniel(a)saltstack.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- We are experiencing a SegFault with python2.7 when trying to run our test suite. [ 860.345322] salt-call[18552]: segfault at 3ea0 ip 00007ff59cede8bc sp 00007ffefe1e2170 error 4 in libpython2.7.so.1.0[7ff59ce0b000+1ae000] This is happening with the 42.2 ami on Amazon AWS, as well as 42.2 and 42.3 on Linode. We are running our test suite salt states here https://github.com/saltstack/salt-jenkins We are calling `salt-call --local state.apply git.salt pillar='{testing_dir: /tmp/kitchen/testing, clone_repo: false, salttesting_namespec: "salttesting==2017.6.1"}' saltenv=2017.7` It does have to be called as the exec from ssh for this to fail. I am attaching the core dump. Thanks, Daniel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1160071] New: Darktable 3.0.0-lp151.174.2 fails to open. Claims libdarktable.so "No such file"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Jun '22

09 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160071 Bug ID: 1160071 Summary: Darktable 3.0.0-lp151.174.2 fails to open. Claims libdarktable.so "No such file" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: paul.pgp-7(a)gmx.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Darktable 3.0.0-lp151.174.2 (from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics/openSUSE_Leap_15.1 ) fails to open. Launching from a terminal gives the following message: paul@Orion-17:~> darktable darktable: error while loading shared libraries: libdarktable.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory paul@Orion-17:~> libdarktable.so is present at /usr/lib64/darktable/ with size 3.0 MiB (3,180,448) and date/time Friday, 3 January 2020 07:29:13 GMT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 9

[Bug 899330] New: Interfaces does not automatically show up in firewall with NetworkManager
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Jun '22

05 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899330 Bug ID: 899330 Summary: Interfaces does not automatically show up in firewall with NetworkManager Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201408* Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: razirazo_90(a)live.com.my QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- When using NetworkManager, network interfaces does not listed in firewall. I have to manually configure it using Wicked Service first, to make it registered in firewall. And then use networkManager back. This is troublesome, for example when setting up internet sharing you can't proceed to zone assign and Network masquerade until you do the step above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 1102737] New: Install does not work on Pentium III machine
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Jun '22

04 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102737 Bug ID: 1102737 Summary: Install does not work on Pentium III machine Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: srid(a)rkmail.ru QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I tried installing Tumbleweed on my Tualatin machine, but it fails to get to repository with following error: OpenSSL internal error, assertion failed: FATAL FIPS SELFTEST FAILURE Tried booting with fips=0, it does not help. I guess libssl wants something like SSE2, NX-bit or some other feature this old CPU lacks. Is there some chance of working around that issue? I know you'll likely don't want to bother with such an old hardware, but 'i586' in iso name 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-i586-Snapshot20180723-Media.iso' is a little bit confusing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1080259] New: HPC modules show wrong summary
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080259 Bug ID: 1080259 Summary: HPC modules show wrong summary Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: cgoll(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Most of the HPC lmod modules show the wrong summary. E.g. for the package openmpi-gnu-hpc thethe command module spider outputs openmpi: openmpi/1.10.7 Dependency package for openmpi_1_10_7-gnu-hpc-devel-static which is self refering and useless. It should be "A powerful implementation of MPI" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 13

[Bug 1058563] New: hdf5 transient make check errors in TW ring2 for ppc64le
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058563 Bug ID: 1058563 Summary: hdf5 transient make check errors in TW ring2 for ppc64le Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: PowerPC OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: normand(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 740535 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=740535&action=edit hdf5 build failures 20170910 hdf5 transient make check errors in TW ring2 for ppc64le On two successive hdf5 build output from OBS (1) the log is reporting different failing tests (2) If I try locally an osc co + osc build locally on two different KVM Host I am not able to recreate the problem. (1) https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:Rings:2-TestDVD/hd… (2) === Rings:2 on 20170910: [ 2046s] Testing h5watch TEST.h5/DSET_TWO *FAILED* [ 2046s] Testing h5watch --fields=field1,field2 TEST.h5/DSET_CMPD *FAILED* [ 2046s] Testing h5watch --fields=field2.b.a,field2.c TEST.h5/DSET_CMPD_TWO *FAILED* === Rings:2 on 20170912: [ 2087s] Testing h5watch TEST.h5/DSET_ONE *FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch TEST.h5/DSET_TWO *FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch --fields=field2.b.a --fields=field2.c TEST.h5/DSET_CMP*FAILED* [ 2087s] *FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch --fields=field2.b --fields=field4 TEST.h5/DSET_CMPD_TW*FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch --fields=field2.b.a,field2.c TEST.h5/DSET_CMPD_TWO *FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch --dim TEST.h5/DSET_ONE *FAILED* [ 2087s] Testing h5watch --width=30 TEST.h5/DSET_TWO *FAILED* === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1154616] New: darktable: fix exporting of EXIF data to webp
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 31 May '22

31 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1154616 Bug ID: 1154616 Summary: darktable: fix exporting of EXIF data to webp Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dmitry.ashkadov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello, could you apply this change https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/d18b81f2c0d42c68939632b56… to darktable please? It should fix a problem when darktable does not save EXIF information to webp format. Exported to webp format file does not contain exif information. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1