February 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1159706] puddletag - ASSERT: "PyList_CheckExact(py)" in file ../../qpy/QtCore/qpycore_chimera.cpp
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159706 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159706#c8 Philipp Seiler <p.seiler(a)linuxmail.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(opensuse(a)mike.fra | |nken.de) | --- Comment #8 from Philipp Seiler <p.seiler(a)linuxmail.org> --- Than I have no further advice, fix, etc as puddletag has already been removed from tumbleweed. So it's basically a wontfix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1110722] New: pocl uses compile-time CPU detection
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1110722 Bug ID: 1110722 Summary: pocl uses compile-time CPU detection Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: osukup(a)suse.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: mpluskal(a)suse.com Blocks: 1100677 Found By: Development Blocker: --- Steps to Reproduce: osc co Factory/pocl && cd $_ osc build --no-service --vm-type=kvm --build-opt=--vm-custom-opt="-cpu qemu64" +compare result to one without build-opt using /usr/lib/build/pkg-diff.sh $rpm1 $rpm2 Was previously solved with https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/626138 /usr/lib64/libpocl.so.2.2.0 differs in assembler output --- /tmp/tmp.3iZr1DZRz5/tmp.MomrQD5u2D 2018-09-26 04:41:09.682694138 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.3iZr1DZRz5/tmp.3XC0iGKeQV 2018-09-26 04:41:09.750694493 +0000 @@ -93827,10 +93827,10 @@ lea offset(%rsp),%rdi lea offset(%rsp),%rsi callq <_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE9_M_assignERKS4_@plt> - mov %r12,%rax - sub offset(%rsp),%rax - cmp $something,%rax - jbe <_ZL14kernel_libraryP13_cl_device_id + ofs> + mov offset(%rsp),%rax + or $something,%rax + cmp %r12,%rax + je <_ZL14kernel_libraryP13_cl_device_id + ofs> lea offset(%rip),%rsi # <supported_image_formats + ofs> In the build-root I can see: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/pocl-1.2/build/CMakeCache.txt 2033-10-28 17:46:42.015636815 +0000 @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ LINK_COMMAND:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/ld //The Host CPU to use with llc -LLC_HOST_CPU:STRING=haswell +LLC_HOST_CPU:STRING=pentium2 //LLVM assembler LLVM_AS:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/llvm-as @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ Hwloc_hwloc_PREFIX:INTERNAL= Hwloc_hwloc_VERSION:INTERNAL= //Autodetected CPU -LLC_HOST_CPU_AUTO:INTERNAL=haswell +LLC_HOST_CPU_AUTO:INTERNAL=pentium2 might be an upstream pocl bug, where the result of CPU detection accidentally gets used during build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1163120] No mitigations for CPU vulnerabilities
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163120 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163120#c3 --- Comment #3 from Borislav Petkov <bpetkov(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Suse User from comment #2) > What about kernel-level mitigations? Are these impossible, i.e. is microcode > the only way to mitigate the remaining vulnerabilities? Yes. > What about web JavaScript? I have read (and seen Google's presentation) that > it is possible web JS to read the RAM. This is quite worrying. Which presentation is that? Link? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1163028] mount.nfs needs /etc/protocols
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163028 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163028#c2 --- Comment #2 from Jiří Zlonický <jzl(a)volny.cz> --- You are right. Thank you. After this weird modification (files -> usrfiles in /etc/nsswitch.conf) are files /etc/protocols and /etc/services unnecessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1163120] No mitigations for CPU vulnerabilities
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163120 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163120#c2 --- Comment #2 from Suse User <suseino(a)riseup.net> --- What about kernel-level mitigations? Are these impossible, i.e. is microcode the only way to mitigate the remaining vulnerabilities? > But if you don't run guests on it, I wouldn't worry about it. What about web JavaScript? I have read (and seen Google's presentation) that it is possible web JS to read the RAM. This is quite worrying. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1163188] New: Restore session not working
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163188 Bug ID: 1163188 Summary: Restore session not working Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: devguy.ca(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Go to Settings > Startup and Shutdown > Desktop Session >From "On Login", select, "Restore previous session". Open some windows, logout/reboot, login. Session not getting saved and restored, I am seeing is an empty session. Note you might need to select, "Start with an empty session", logout/reboot and then follow the steps above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1068707] New: bcache broken on s390x
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068707 Bug ID: 1068707 Summary: bcache broken on s390x Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: S/390-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: ro(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- trying to repeat on s390x what worked on aarch64 ... OBS_WORKER_DISK=/dev/mapper/3600a098051764b2d515d436d66416b4f wipefs -f -a $OBS_WORKER_DISK modprobe zram num_devices=1 modprobe bcache echo 8G > /sys/block/zram0/disksize wipefs -f -a /dev/zram0 make-bcache --wipe-bcache --block 4k --bucket 2M -B $OBS_WORKER_DISK -C /dev/zram0 # up to here it seemed to work, but: echo /dev/zram0 > /sys/fs/bcache/register -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument in dmesg: [1256250.924470] zram: Added device: zram0 [1256258.363017] zram0: detected capacity change from 0 to 8589934592 [1256269.146000] bcache: register_bcache() error opening /dev/dm-2: Not a bcache superblock [1256275.462897] bcache: register_bcache() error opening /dev/zram0: Not a bcache superblock so the written superblock is not recognized ... endianess issue ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1137373] Systemd mount and unmount partition during boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1137373 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1137373#c23 PedroPablo Leon <pedropablolc(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pedropablolc(a)gmail.com --- Comment #23 from PedroPablo Leon <pedropablolc(a)gmail.com> --- Me too! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1163041] New: audit-secondary fails to build on x86_64 and i586
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163041 Bug ID: 1163041 Summary: audit-secondary fails to build on x86_64 and i586 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello audit-secondary fails to build on both x86_64 and i586 https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/openSUSE:Leap:15.2:Staging:N?arc… [ 47s] gen_tables.c:89:23: note: in definition of macro '_S' [ 47s] #define _S(VAL, S) { (VAL), (S), 0, 0 }, [ 47s] ^~~ [ 47s] flagtab.h:26:4: note: in expansion of macro 'AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE' [ 47s] _S(AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE, "exclude" ) [ 47s] ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 47s] make[2]: *** [Makefile:973: gen_flagtabs_h-gen_tables.o] Error 1 [ 47s] make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ 47s] In file included from gen_tables.c:40:0: [ 47s] libaudit.h:288:0: warning: "AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE" redefined [ 47s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE [ 47s] [ 47s] In file included from libaudit.h:35:0, [ 47s] from gen_tables.c:40: [ 47s] /usr/include/linux/audit.h:163:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 47s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE 0x05 /* Apply rule before record creation */ [ 47s] [ 47s] In file included from gen_tables.c:40:0: [ 47s] libaudit.h:288:0: warning: "AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE" redefined [ 47s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE [ 47s] [ 47s] In file included from libaudit.h:35:0, [ 47s] from gen_tables.c:40: [ 47s] /usr/include/linux/audit.h:163:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 47s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE 0x05 /* Apply rule before record creation */ [ 47s] [ 47s] make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/audit-2.8.1/lib' [ 47s] make[1]: *** [Makefile:468: all-recursive] Error 1 [ 47s] make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/audit-2.8.1' [ 47s] make: *** [Makefile:400: all] Error 2 [ 47s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TOl4NQ (%build) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1163040] New: audit fails to build on x86_64 and i586
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '20

08 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163040 Bug ID: 1163040 Summary: audit fails to build on x86_64 and i586 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 829501 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=829501&action=edit failed build log for audit.x86_64 Hello Package audit fails to build on both x86_64 and i586 https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Leap:15.2:Staging:N/audit-… [ 96s] gen_tables.c:89:23: note: in definition of macro '_S' [ 96s] #define _S(VAL, S) { (VAL), (S), 0, 0 }, [ 96s] ^~~ [ 96s] flagtab.h:26:4: note: in expansion of macro 'AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE' [ 96s] _S(AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE, "exclude" ) [ 96s] ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 96s] make: *** [Makefile:973: gen_flagtabs_h-gen_tables.o] Error 1 [ 96s] make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ 96s] In file included from gen_tables.c:40:0: [ 96s] libaudit.h:288:0: warning: "AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE" redefined [ 96s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE [ 96s] [ 96s] In file included from libaudit.h:35:0, [ 96s] from gen_tables.c:40: [ 96s] /usr/include/linux/audit.h:163:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 96s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE 0x05 /* Apply rule before record creation */ [ 96s] [ 96s] In file included from gen_tables.c:40:0: [ 96s] libaudit.h:288:0: warning: "AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE" redefined [ 96s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE [ 96s] [ 96s] In file included from libaudit.h:35:0, [ 96s] from gen_tables.c:40: [ 96s] /usr/include/linux/audit.h:163:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 96s] #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE 0x05 /* Apply rule before record creation */ [ 96s] [ 97s] make: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/audit-2.8.1/lib' [ 97s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BJhvhu (%build) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11